Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: Whose risks? whose benefits?

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-18

  Gregory, Kimberl D ^a,b   Jackson, Sherri ^a   Korst, Lisa ^c   Fridman, Moshe ^d  

^a BURNS AND ALLEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d AMF Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean delivery; informed consent; labor and delivery complications; obstetric quality and safety

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BACTERIURIA; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BREAST FEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; HEART ARREST; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INFECTION; INFECTION RISK; INFORMED CONSENT; LIVE BIRTH; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SHOCK; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL MORTALITY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84856257052     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Thorp JM. Clinical aspects of normal and abnormal labor. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD, Lockwood CJ, Moore TR., et al, eds. Creasy & Resnik's Maternal-Fetal Medicine Principles & Practices. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009; 692 724
2. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu R, Janik R. et al. Vaginal Birth after Cesarean New Insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 191. AHRQ Publication No 10E003. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; March 2010
3. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data brief, No. 35. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010; Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db35. htm. Accessed May 1, 2011
4. National Vital Statistics Reports, Volume 57, Number 12, March 18, 2009. http://www.cd.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nv28.2sr57/nvsr57-12.pdf
5. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 58, No. 19, May 20, 2010. http://w33.4ww.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58-19.pdf
6. National Women's Law Center. Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000). Available at: http://hrc.nwlc.org/status-indicators/maternal-mortality-rate- 1000007. Accessed May 1, 2011
7. Source: Maternal Mortality Rate, California and United States; 19912008. Available at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Documents/MO-CAPAMR- MaternalMortalityRates-USCA-1991-2008.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
8. PAMR. 19992008 Florida Pregnancy-Related Mortality Report: Why Are Florida Mothers Continuing to Die? Available at: http://www.doh.state.fl.us/ Family/mch/pamr/1999-2008-pamr-report.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
9. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Family Health Administration Center for Maternal and Child Health. Maternal Mortality Review Program. 2010 Annual Report. Available at: http://fha.maryland.gov/pdf/mch/ 2010MMRrpt.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
10. New York Department of Health. Maternal Mortality Rate Per 100,000 Live Births. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/statistics/chac/birth/ matmort.htm. Accessed May 1, 2011
11. Texas Department of State Health Services. 2008 Mortality. Available at: http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/CHS/VSTAT/latest/nmortal.shtm. Accessed May 1, 2011
12. Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A., et al. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand: 2010; 89 896 902
13. Kamilya G, Seal SL, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya SK, Hazra A. Maternal mortality and cesarean delivery: an analytical observational study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res: 2010; 36 248 253
14. Quiroz LH, Chang H, Blomquist JL, Okoh YK, Handa VL. Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting. Am J Perinatol: 2009; 26 271 277
15. Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ: 2007; 176 455 460 (Pubitemid 46374353)
16. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 107 6 1386 1397
17. Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala S, Brown SS., et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 810, 2010. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 1279 1295
18. Emmons SL, Krohn M, Jackson M, Eschenbach DA. Development of wound infections among women undergoing cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol: 1988; 72 559 564
19. Roberts S, Maccato M, Faro S, Pinell P. The microbiology of post-cesarean wound morbidity. Obstet Gynecol: 1993; 81 383 386 (Pubitemid 23085295)
20. Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 203 271; e1 e7
21. Buchholz NP, Daly-Grandeau E, Huber-Buchholz MM. Urological complications associated with caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 1994; 56 161 163 (Pubitemid 24290279)
22. Cheesman K, Brady JE, Flood P, Li G. Epidemiology of anesthesia-related complications in labor and delivery, New York State, 20022005. Anesth Analg: 2009; 109 1174 1181
23. Mhyre JM. What's new in obstetric anesthesia in 2009? An update on maternal patient safety. Anesth Analg: 2010; 111 1480 1487
24. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Number 36, July 2002. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: 2002; 78 321 335
25. Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP, Callaghan WM. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 19792002. Obstet Gynecol: 2011; 117 69 74
26. Loubert C, Hinova A, Fernando R. Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia: 2011; 66 191 212
27. Ford JB, Roberts CL, Simpson JM, Vaughan JC, Cameron CA. Increased postpartum hemorrhage rates in Australia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: 2007; 98 237 243 (Pubitemid 47210992)
28. Rossi AC, Lee RH, Chmait RH. Emergency postpartum hysterectomy for uncontrolled postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 637 644
29. Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Theodora M, Antsaklis A. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand: 2007; 86 223 227
30. Roopnarinesingh R, Fay L, McKenna P. A 27-year review of obstetric hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol: 2003; 23 252 254 (Pubitemid 36735062)
31. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Knight M, Morris JM. Amniotic fluid embolism in an Australian population-based cohort. BJOG: 2010;; July 7 [Epub ahead of print]
32. Knight M, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ. UK Obstetric Surveillance System. Incidence and risk factors for amniotic-fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 910 917
33. Abenhaim HA, Azoulay L, Kramer MS, Leduc L. Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based study on 3 million births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2008; 199 49; e1 e8
34. AHRQ Quality Indicators. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2010
35. The Joint Commission. Available at: www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/ VTE-CORE-MEASURE-SET-SELECTION-FORM.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
36. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reducing the risk of thrombosis and embolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. Green-top Guideline No. 37. Available at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/ GT37ReducingRiskThrombo.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2011
37. National Quality Forum. National Quality Forum endorses national consensus standards for perinatal care. Available at: http://www.qualityforum. org/News-And-Resources/Press-Releases/2008/National-Quality-Forum-Endorses- National-Consensus-Standards-for-Perinatal-Care.aspx. Accessed May 2, 2011
38. Lang CT, King JC. Maternal mortality in the United States. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol: 2008; 22 517 531 (Pubitemid 351606934)
39. National Vital Statistics Reports. Deaths: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/ nvsr57-14.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
40. National Vital Statistics Report. Deaths: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010; 58. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/ nvsr58-19.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
41. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Family Health Administration Center for Maternal and Child Health. Maternal Mortality Review Program. 2010 Annual Report.
42. Harper MA, Byington RP, Espeland MA, Naughton M, Meyer R, Lane K. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstet Gynecol: 2003; 102 273 278 (Pubitemid 36936998)
43. Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, Dekker G, van Dongen P, van Geijn H, Gravenhorst JB. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in The Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand: 1997; 76 332 334 (Pubitemid 27197173)
44. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD., et al. Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep: 2010; 58 1 85
45. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1997; 177 1071 1078 (Pubitemid 27525359)
46. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth(1). Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 97 5 Pt 1 765 769
47. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ., et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 107 1226 1232 (Pubitemid 44336884)
48. Hemminki E. Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancya review of cohort studies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol: 1996; 10 366 379 (Pubitemid 26366430)
49. Silver RM. Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol: 2010; 34 258 266
50. Oral E, Elter K. The impact of cesarean birth on subsequent fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol: 2007; 19 238 243 (Pubitemid 46743069)
51. Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, Chan A. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol: 2007; 109 2 Pt 1 270 276 (Pubitemid 46197415)
52. Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet: 2003; 362 1779 1784 (Pubitemid 37494755)
53. Chongsuvivatwong V, Bachtiar H, Chowdhury ME., et al. Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res: 2010; 36 45 51
54. Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF. Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 97 350 356 (Pubitemid 32184691)
55. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED., et al. Term Breech Trial 3-Month Follow-up Collaborative Group Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA: 2002; 287 1822 1831 (Pubitemid 34303627)
56. Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Ludlow J, Benness C. Incidence and etiology of pelvic floor dysfunction and mode of delivery: an overview. Dis Colon Rectum: 2009; 52 1186 1195
57. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG: 2000; 107 1460 1470 (Pubitemid 32047477)
58. Nygaard IE, Rao SS, Dawson JD. Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30-year retrospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol: 1997; 89 896 901 (Pubitemid 27220449)
59. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ., et al. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 191 917 927 (Pubitemid 39298134)
60. Buchsbaum GM, Chin M, Glantz C, Guzick D. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in a cohort of nuns. Obstet Gynecol: 2002; 100 226 229 (Pubitemid 34874781)
61. Connolly TJ, Litman HJ, Tennstedt SL, Link CL, McKinlay JB. The effect of mode of delivery, parity, and birth weight on risk of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct: 2007; 18 1033 1042 (Pubitemid 350130407)
62. Goldstein SR. The role of transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of the menopausal endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 201 5 11
63. Wax JR, Herson V, Carignan E, Mather J, Ingardia CJ. Contribution of elective delivery to severe respiratory distress at term. Am J Perinatol: 2002; 19 81 86 (Pubitemid 34229583)
64. Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Fanaroff A, Hack M. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics: 1997; 100 3 Pt 1 348 353
65. Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Sold G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr: 2004; 93 643 647 (Pubitemid 38570232)
66. Bailit JL, Gregory KD, Reddy UM., et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 202 245; e1 e245, e12
67. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol: 1995; 102 101 106
68. Zanardo V, Nicolussi S, Carlo G., et al. Beta endorphin concentrations in human milk. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr: 2001; 33 160 164 (Pubitemid 32802813)
69. Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv: 2004; 59 601 616 (Pubitemid 38971773)
70. Laubereau B, Filipiak-Pittroff B, von Berg A, Grubl A, Reinhardt D, Wichmann HE., et al, for the GINI Study Group Cesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child: 2004; 89 993 997
71. Biasucci G, Benenati B, Morelli L, Bessi E, Boehm G. Cesarean delivery may affect the early biodiversity of intestinal bacteria. J Nutr: 2008; 138 1796S 1800S
72. Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M., et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A: 2010; 107 11971 11975
73. Huurre A, Kalliomki M, Rautava S, Rinne M, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Mode of deliveryeffects on gut microbiota and humoral immunity. Neonatology: 2008; 93 236 240 (Pubitemid 351799101)
74. Grnlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, Kero P. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr: 1999; 28 19 25 (Pubitemid 29292870)
75. Eggesb M, Botten G, Stigum H, Nafstad P, Magnus P. Is delivery by cesarean section a risk factor for food allergy? J Allergy Clin Immunol: 2003; 112 420 426 (Pubitemid 36981385)
76. Negele K, Heinrich J, Borte M., et al. LISA Study Group Mode of delivery and development of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol: 2004; 15 48 54 (Pubitemid 38327299)
77. Renz-Polster H, David MR, Buist AS., et al. Caesarean section delivery and the risk of allergic disorders in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy: 2005; 35 1466 1472
78. Koplin J, Allen K, Gurrin L, Osborne N, Tang ML, Dharmage S. Is caesarean delivery associated with sensitization to food allergens and IgE-mediated food allergy: a systematic review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol: 2008; 19 682 687
79. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia in the average-weight infant. Obstet Gynecol: 1986; 67 614 618 (Pubitemid 16111914)
80. Gross SJ, Shime J, Farine D. Shoulder dystocia: predictors and outcome. A five-year review. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1987; 156 334 336 (Pubitemid 17020485)
81. Nocon JJ, McKenzie DK, Thomas LJ, Hansell RS. Shoulder dystocia: an analysis of risks and obstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1993; 168 6 Pt 1 1732 1737; discussion 17371739
82. Baskett TF, Allen AC. Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol: 1995; 86 14 17
83. McFarland LV, Raskin M, Daling JR, Benedetti TJ. Erb/Duchenne's palsy: a consequence of fetal macrosomia and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol: 1986; 68 784 788 (Pubitemid 17190217)
84. Dunn DW, Engle WA. Brachial plexus palsy: intrauterine onset. Pediatr Neurol: 1985; 1 367 369 (Pubitemid 17028734)
85. Koenigsberger MR. Brachial plexus palsy at birth: intrauterine or due to birth trauma? Ann Neurol: 1980; 8 228 230
86. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ., et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med: 2004; 351 2581 2589 (Pubitemid 39628579)
87. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on ethics: Committee Opinion #321: Maternal decision making, ethics and the law. Obstet Gynecol: 2005; 106 1127 1137
88. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 190 1198 1200 (Pubitemid 38692197)
89. Lyerly AD, Little MO. Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol: 2010; 34 337 344
90. Rybak EA. Hippocratic ideal, Faustian bargain and Damocles' sword: erosion of patient autonomy in obstetrics. J Perinatol: 2009; 29 721 725
91. Smith GCS. Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 184 489 496 (Pubitemid 32207005)
92. Gregory KD, Fridman M, Shah S, Korst LM. Global measures of quality- and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates? Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 200 681; e1 e7