Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia by endoscopic techniques using electricity and open prostatectomy: A review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association;Traitement de l'hyperplasie bénigne de prostate par techniques endoscopiques électriques et adénomectomie voie haute: Revue de littérature du CTMH de l'AFU

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 73-79

  Delongchamps, N B ^a   Robert, G ^b   Descazeaud, A ^c,d   Cornu, J N ^e   Azzouzi, A R ^f   Haillot, O ^g   Devonec, M ^h   Fourmarier, M ⁱ   Ballereau, C ^j   Lukacs, B ^e   Dumonceau, O ^k   Saussine, C ^l   de la Taille, A ^m,n  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^b HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^c LIMOGES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES   (France)

^e HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^f ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF TOURS   (France)

^h HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

ⁱ CENTRE HOSPITALIER DU PAYS D AIX   (France)

^j Hôpital Privé de la Louvière   (France)

^k SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (France)

^l HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

^m HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁿ INSERM   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Open prostatectomy; Resection; Vaporisation

Indexed keywords

ELECTROSURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOM; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATECTOMY; SHORT SURVEY;

ELECTROSURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA;

EID: 84856253054     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2011.07.005     Document Type: Short Survey

References (32)

1. Philipps B, Ball C, Sacket D, Benedoch D Straus S, Haynes B, et al. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence 2001. http://www.cebm.net/.
2. Lourenco T., Armstrong N., N'Dow J., Nabi G., Deverill M., Pickard R., et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement. Health Technol Assess 2008, 12:1-146.
3. Bootsma A., Laguna Pes M., Geerlings S., Goossens A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in urologic procedures: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2008, 54:1270-1286.
4. Reich O., Gratzke C., Stief C.G. Techniques and long-term results of surgical procedures for BPH. Eur Urol 2006, 49:970-978.
5. Thomas A.W., Cannon A., Bartlett E., Ellis-Jones J., Abrams P., et al. The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction in men: minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up of transurethral resection of prostate for bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 2005, 174:1887-1891.
6. Madersbacher S., Lackner J., Brossner C., Röhlich M., Stancik I., Willinger M., et al. Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases. Eur Urol 2005, 47:499-504.
7. Hahn R.G. Smoking increases the risk of large scale fluid absorption during transurethral prostatic resection. J Urol 2001, 166:162-165.
8. Lebdai S., Robert G., Devonnec M., Fourmarier M., Haillot O., Saussine C., et al. Comité des troubles mictionnels de l'homme de l'association française d'urologie (CTMH-AFU). Management of patients under anticoagulants for transurethral resection of the prostate: a multicentric study by the CTMH-AFU. Prog Urol 2009, 19:553-557.
9. Berry A., Barratt A. Prophylactic antibiotic use in transurethral prostatic resection: a meta-analysis. J Urol 2002, 167:571-577.
10. Hahn R.G., Farahmand B.Y., Hallin A., Hammar N., Persson P.G. Incidence of acute myocardial infarction and cause specific mortality after transurethral treatments of prostatic hypertrophy. Urology 2000, 55:236-240.
11. de Sio M., Autorino R., Quarto G., Damiano R., Perdona S., di Lorenzo G., et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology 2006, 67:69-72.
12. Singh H., Desai M.R., Shrivastav P., Vani K. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2005, 19:333-338.
13. Kim J.Y., Moon K.H., Yoon C.J., Park T.C. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a comparative study with monopolar transurethral resection. Korean J Urol 2006, 47:493-497.
14. Seckiner I., Yesilli C., Akduman B., Altan K., Mungan N.A. A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 2006, 76:139-143.
15. Nuhǒglu B., Ayyildiz A., Karaguzel E., Cebeci O., Germiyanoglu C. Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: results of 1-year follow up. Int J Urol 2006, 13:21-24.
16. Tefekli A., Muslumanoglu A.Y., Baykal M., Binbay M., Tas A., Altunrende F. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 2005, 174:1339-1343.
17. Mamoulakis C., Skolarikos A., Schulze M., Scoffone C.M., Rassweiler J.J., Alivizatos G., et al. Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 2011, [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x.
18. Kaplan S.A., Laor E., Fatal M., Te A.E. Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: a blinded, prospective comparative study with 1-year follow-up. J Urol 1998, 159:454-458.
19. Fowler C., McAllister W., Plail R., Karim O., Yang Q. Randomised evaluation of alternative electrosurgical modalities to treat bladder outflow obstruction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Health Technol Assess 2005, 9:1-30.
20. Hammadeh M.Y., Madaan S., Hines J., Philp T. 5-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial to compare transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and standard transurethral resection. Urology 2003, 61:1166-1171.
21. Hon N.H.Y., Brathwaite D., Hussain Z., Ghiblawi S., Brace H., Hayne D., et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long-term follow-up. J Urol 2006, 176:205-209.
22. Love C.J., Dowling C., Pham T., Tan A., McFarlane J.P., Dunsmuir W.D. Gyrus (R) bipolar electrovaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 1-year follow-up. J Urol 2003, 169:390.
23. Gupta N., Sivaramakrishna, Kumar R., Dogra P.N., Seth A. Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of >40g. BJU Int 2006, 97:85-89.
24. Liu C.K., Lee W.K., Ko M.C., Chiang H.S., Wan K.S. Transurethral electrovapor resection versus standard transurethral resection treatment for a large prostate: a 2-year follow-up study conducted in Taiwan. Urol Int 2006, 76:144-149.
25. Fung B.T., Li S.K., Yu C.F., Lau B.E., Hou S.S. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing plasmakinetic vaporesection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Asian J Surg 2005, 28:24-28.
26. Tubaro A., Carter S., Hind A., et al. A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2001, 166:172-176.
27. Skolarikos A., Papachristou C., Athanasiadis G., Chalikopoulos D., Deliveliotis C., Alivizatos G., et al. Eighteen-month results of a randomized prospective study comparing transurethral photoselective vaporization with transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas greater than 80cc. J Endourol 2008, 22:2333-2340.
28. Kuntz R.M., Lehrich K., Ahyai S.A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 2008, 53:160-166.
29. Naspro R., Suardi N., Salonia A., Scattoni V., Guazzoni G., Colombo R., et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 70g: 24-months follow-up. Eur Urol 2006, 50:563-568.
30. Semmens J.B., Wisniewski Z.S., Bass A.J., Holman C.D., Rouse I.L. Trends in repeat prostatectomy after surgery for benign prostate disease: application of record linkage to healthcare outcomes. BJU Int 1999, 84:972-975.
31. Alivizatos G., Skolarikos A., Chalikopoulos D., Papachristou C., Sopilidis O., Dellis A., et al. Transurethral photoselective vaporization versus transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas >80ml: 12-mo results of a randomized prospective study. Eur Urol 2008, 54:427-437.
32. Gratzke C., Schlenker B., Seitz M., Karl A., Hermanek P., Lack N., et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2007, 177:1419-1422.