Methods and procedures for defining aquifer parameters

Practical Handbook of Environmental Site Characterization and Ground-Water Monitoring, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 913-958

  Sevee, John ^a  

^a Sevee/Maher Engineers Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856241190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (129)

1. ASTM, Standard Practice for Thin-Walled Tube Sampling of Soils, ASTM Standard D 1587, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004a, 3 pp.
2. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density of Soil in Place by the Drive-Cylinder Method, ASTM Standard D 2937, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004b, 4 pp.
3. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by the Rubber Balloon Method, ASTM Standard D 2167, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004c, 6 pp.
4. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by the Sand Cone Method, ASTM Standard D 1556, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004d, 6 pp.
5. ASTM, Standard Practice for Diamond Core Drilling for Site Investigation, ASTM Standard D 2113, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004e, 4 pp.
6. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density of Soil and Soil Aggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods, ASTM Standard D 2922, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004f, 5 pp.
7. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock, ASTM Standard D 2216, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004g, 4 pp.
8. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Water Content of Soil and Rock in Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth), ASTM Standard D 3017, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004h, 5 pp.
9. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter, ASTM Standard D 5084, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004i, 8 pp.
10. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Material Using a Rigid-Wall, Compaction-Mold Permeameter, ASTM Standard D 5856, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004j, 8 pp.
11. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils, ASTM Standard D 2434, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004k, 5 pp.
12. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbs/ft3(600 kN-m/m3)), ASTM Standard D 698, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004l, 8 pp.
13. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbs/ft3(2,700 kN-m/m3)), ASTM Standard D 1557, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004m, 8 pp.
14. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Field Procedure) for Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug) Tests for Determining Hydraulic Properties of Aquifers, ASTM Standard D 4044, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004n, 3 pp.
15. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity of Nonleaky Confined Aquifers by Overdamped Well Response to Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug) Tests, ASTM Standard D 4104, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004o, 4 pp.
16. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of an Unconfined Aquifer by Overdamped Well Response to Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug) Tests, ASTM Standard D 5912, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004p, 4 pp.
17. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity of Nonleaky Confined Aquifers by Underdamped Well Response to Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug) Tests, ASTM Standard D 5785, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004q, 5 pp.
18. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity of Nonleaky Confined Aquifers by Critically Damped Well Response to Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug) Tests, ASTM Standard D 5881, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004r, 8 pp.
19. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Determining Transmissivity and Storage Coefficient of Low-Permeability Rocks by In Situ Measurements Using the Constant-Head Injection Test, ASTM Standard D 4630, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004s, 6 pp.
20. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Determining Transmissivity and Storage Coefficient of Low-Permeability Rocks by In Situ Measurements Using the Pressure Pulse Technique, ASTM Standard D 4631, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004t, 7 pp.
21. ASTM, Standard Guide for Selection of Aquifer Test Method in Determining Hydraulic Properties by Well Techniques, ASTM Standard D 4043, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004u, 6 pp.
22. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Field Procedure) for Withdrawal and Injection Well Tests for Determining Hydraulic Properties of Aquifer Systems, ASTM Standard D 4050, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004v, 4 pp.
23. ASTM, Standard Guide for Methods for Measuring Well Discharge, ASTM Standard D 5737, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004w, 4 pp.
24. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Open-Channel Flow Measurement of Water Indirectly at Culverts, ASTM Standard D 5242, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004x, 4 pp.
25. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Open-Channel Flow Measurement with Palmer-Bowlus Flumes, ASTM Standard D 5390, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004y, 4 pp.
26. ASTM, Standard Test Method to Measure the Rate of Well Discharge by Circular Orifice Weir, ASTM Standard D 5716, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004z, 4 pp.
27. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Hydraulic Properties of a Confined Aquifer and a Leaky Confining Bed With Negligible Storage by the Hantush-Jacob Method, ASTM Standard D 6029, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004aa, 10 pp.
28. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Hydraulic Properties of a Confined Aquifer Taking Into Consideration Storage of Water in Leaky Confining Beds by the Modified Hantush Method, ASTM Standard D 6028, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004bb, 9 pp.
29. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity and Storage Coefficient of Nonleaky Confined Aquifers by the Theis Nonequilibrium Method, ASTM Standard D 4106, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004cc, 5 pp.
30. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity and Storage Coefficient of Nonleaky Confined Aquifers by the Modified Theis Nonequilibrium Method, ASTM Standard D 4105, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004dd, 5 pp.
31. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity of Nonleaky Confined Aquifers by the Theis Recovery Method, ASTM Standard D 5269, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004ee, 5 pp.
32. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Tests of Anisotropic Unconfined Aquifers by the Neuman Method, ASTM Standard D 5920, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004ff, 8 pp.
33. ASTM, Standard Test Method (Analytical Procedure) for Determining Transmissivity and Storage Coefficient of Bounded, Nonleaky, Confined Aquifers, ASTM Standard D 5270, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004gg, 7 pp.
34. ASTM, Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils, ASTM Standard D 2435, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004hh, 10 pp.
35. Barenblatt, G.I., I.P. Zheltov, and I.N. Kochina, Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks (strata), Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 24, 1286–1301, 1960.
36. Bear, J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, American Elsevier, New York, NY, 1972.
37. Bentley, H.W. and G.R. Walter, Two-Well Recirculating Tracer Test at H-2, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), Southeastern New Mexico, Hydro-Geochem Inc., Tuscon, AZ, 1983.
38. Bishop, A.W. and D.J. Henkel, The Measurement of Soil Properties in the Triaxial Test, St. Martins Press, New York, NY, 1962.
39. Black, D.K., and K.L. Lee, Saturating laboratory samples by back pressure, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 99, 1973.
40. Boulton, N.S., Analysis of Data from Non-Equilibrium Pumping Tests Allowing for Delayed Yield from Storage, Proceedings, Institute of Civil Engineers, 26, 1963, 469–482.
41. Boulton, N.S. and T.D. Streltsova, New equations for determining the formation constants of an aquifer from pumping test data, Water Resources, 11(1), 1975.
42. Boulton, N.S. and T.D. Streltsova, Unsteady flow to a pumped well in a fissured water-bearing formation, Journal of Hydrology, 35, 257–269, 1977.
43. Bouwer, H., Groundwater Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.
44. Bouwer, H. and R.C. Rice, A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells, Water Resources Research, 12(3), 423–433, 1976.
45. Bredehoeft, J.D. and I.S. Papadopulos, A method for determining the hydraulic properties of tight formations, Water Resources Research, 16(1), 233–238, 1980.
46. Bull, W.B., Land Subsidence Due to Ground Water Withdrawal in the Los Banos-Kettleman City Area, California. Part 2. Subsidence and Compaction of Deposits, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 437-F, 1975.
47. Burns, W.A. Jr., New single-well test for determining vertical permeability, Transactions of AIME, 246, 743–752, 1969.
48. Butler, J. Jr., The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
49. Cohen, R.M. and R.R. Rabold, Numerical Evaluation of Monitoring Well Design, Proceedings of the First National Outdoor Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water Monitoring and Geophysical Methods, National Water Well Association, Dublin, OH, 1987, pp. 267–284.
50. Cooley, R.L. and C.M. Case, Effect of a water table aquitard on drawdown in an underlying pumped aquifer, Water Resources Research, 9(2), 434–447, 1973.
51. Cooper, H.H., Jr. and C.E. Jacob, A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 27, 526–534, 1946.
52. Cooper, H.H., Jr., J.D. Bredehoeft, and I. S. Papadopulos, Response of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water, Water Resources Research, 3(1), 263–269, 1967.
53. Darcy, H., Les Fontains Publiques de la Ville de Dijon, Dalmont, Paris, 1856.
54. Davis, G.H. and J.R. Rollo, Land Subsidence Related to Decline of Artesian Head at Baton Rouge, Lower Mississippi Valley, U.S.A., Proceedings of the Tokyo Symposium on Land Subsidence, IASH-UNESCO, 1969.
55. Delhomme, J.P. 1974, La Cartographie D'une Grandeur Physique á Partir de Donnees de Differentes Qualites, Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, 10, No. 1, 1974, pp. 185–194.
56. Delhomme, J.P., Kriging in the hydrosciences; Advances in Water Resources, 1(5), 251–266, 1978.
57. de Marsily, G., Quantitative Hydrogeology, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1986.
58. 35Cl variations in a diffusion controlled ground water system, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 50, 1986.
59. Drost, W., D. Klotz, A. Koch, H. Moser, F. Neumaier, and W. Rauert, Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes, Water Resources Research, 4, 1968.
60. Faust, C.R. and J.W. Mercer, Evaluation of slug tests in wells containing a finite-thickness skin, Water Resources Research, 20(4), 504–506, 1984.
61. Forster, C.B. and J.E. Gale, A Field Assessment of the Use of Borehole Pressure Transients to Measure the Permeability of Fractured Rock Masses, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories, Publication LBL 11829, 1981.
62. Freeze, R.A. and J.A. Cherry, Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.
63. Fried, J.J. and P. Ungemach, Determination in-situ du Coefficient de Dispersion Longitudinale D'un Milieu Poreaux Naturel, Cr. Academic Science Paris, 272, Serie A, 1971.
64. Gambolati, G. and R.A. Freeze, Mathematical simulation of the subsidence of Venice. 1. Theory, Water Resources Research, 9, 721–733, 1973.
65. Gambolati, G., P. Gatto, and R.A. Freeze, Mathematical simulation of the subsidence of Venice. Part 2. Results, Water Resources Research, 10, 563–577, 1974.
66. Gardner, W.H., Methods of Soils Analysis, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, American Society of gronomy, Madison, WI, 1965, pp. 82–127.
67. Gelhar, L.W., A. Mantoglou, C. Welty, and K.R. Rehfeldt, A Review of Field-Scale Physical Solute Transport Processes in Saturated and Unsaturated Porous Media, EPRI Publication EA-4190, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1985.
68. Gibbs, H.J. and W.G. Holtz, Research on Determining the Relative Density of Sands by Spoon Penetration Testing, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. I, 1975.
69. Gillham, R.W. and J.A. Cherry, Contaminant Migration in Saturated Unconsolidated Geologic Deposits: Recent Trends in Hydrogeology, Special Paper 189, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1982.
70. Goodman, R.E., Introduction to Rock Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1980.
71. Gringarten, A.C., Flow-Test Evaluation of Fractured Reservoirs, Geologic Society of America, Special Paper 189, 1982.
72. Gringarten, A.C., and H.J. Ramey Jr., Unsteady-state pressure distributions created by a well with a single horizontal fracture, partial penetration, or restricted entry, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 14(4), 413–426, 1974.
73. Gringarten, A.C., H.J. Ramey Jr., and R. Raghavan, Unsteady-state pressure distributions created by a well with a single infinite-conductivity vertical fracture, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 14(4), 1974.
74. Hantush, M.S. Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 37(6), 1956.
75. Hantush, M.S., Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers, Journal of Geophysical Research, 65(11), 3713–3725, 1960.
76. Hantush, M.S., Hydraulics of Wells, in Advances in Hydroscience, Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1964.
77. Harr, M.E., Groundwater and Seepage, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1962.
78. Hazen, A., Discussion of “Dams on Sand Foundations” by A.C. Koenig, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 73, 1911.
79. Herzog, B.L. and W.J. Morse, Hydraulic Conductivity at a Hazardous Waste Disposal Site: Comparison of Laboratory and Field-Determined Values, Waste Management and Research, Vol. 4, Academic Press, London, 1986.
80. Hillel, D., Applications of Soil Physics, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1980.
81. Hirasaki, G.J., Pulse tests and other early transient pressure analyses for in situ estimation of vertical permeability, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, 257, 75–90, 1974.
82. Hvorslev, M.J., Subsurface Exploration and Sampling of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1949a.
83. Hvorslev, M.J., Time Lag in the Observation of Ground Water Levels and Pressures, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1949b.
84. Jacob, C.E., On the flow of water in an elastic artesian aquifer, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 21(2), 574–586, 1940.
85. Jacob, C.E., and S.W. Lohman, Nonsteady flow to a well of constant drawdown in an extensive aquifer, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 33(4), 1952.
86. Jacquin, C., Etude des ecoulements et des equilibres de fluides dans les sables arqileux, Reveu de l'Institut Francais du Petrole, 20(4), 1965a.
87. Jacquin, C., Interactions entre l'argile et les fluides ecoulement a´ travers les argiles compactes, Reveu de l'Institut Francais du Petrole, 20(10), 1965b.
88. Karasaki, K., Well Test Analysis in Fractured Media, Ph.D. thesis, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1986.
89. Karasaki, K., J.C.S. Long, and P.A. Witherspoon, Analytical models of slug tests, Water Resources Research, 24(1), 115–126, 1988.
90. Kerfoot, W.B., Comparison of 2-D and 3-D Ground Water Flowmeter Probes in Fully-Penetrating Monitoring Wells, Proceedings of the Second National Symposium on Aquifer Restoration and Ground Water Monitoring, National Water Well Association, Dublin, OH, 1982, pp. 264–268.
91. Kipp, K.L., Jr., Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test, Water Resources Research, 21(9), 1397–1408, 1985.
92. Knutson, G., Tracers for Ground Water Investigations, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ground Water Problems, Stockholm, Sweden, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1966.
93. Kruseman, G.P. and N.A. de Ridder, Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data, Publication 47, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1991, 377 pp.
94. Lambe, T.W., Soil Testing for Engineers, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1951.
95. Lambe, T.W. and R.V. Whitman, Soil Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1969.
96. Lofgren, B.E., Measurement of Compaction of Aquifer Systems in Areas of Land Subsidence, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-B, 1961.
97. Louis, C., Introduction a l'hydraulique des roches, Bull. Bur. Rech. Geol. Min., Ser. 2, Sect. III(4), 1974.
98. Milligan, V., Field Measurement of Permeability in Soil and Rock, Proceedings of the Conference on In-Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, 1975.
99. Mitchell, J.K., Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1976.
100. Moench, A.F. and P.A. Hsieh, Slug Testing in Wells with a Finite-Thickness Skin, Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, 1985.
101. Moltz, F.J., O. Guven, J.G. Melville, and J.F. Keely, Performance and Analysis of Aquifer Tests with Implications for Contaminant Transport Modeling, EPA-600/2-86/062, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, OK, 1986.
102. Neuman, S.P., Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic aquifers considering delayed gravity response, Water Resources Research, 11(2), 329–342, 1975.
103. Neuman, S.P., Theoretical and Practical Considerations of Flow in Fractured Rocks, The 1987 Distinguished Seminar Series on Ground Water Science, National Water Well Association, Dublin, OH, 1987.
104. Neuman, S.P., and P.A. Witherspoon, Theory of flow in a confined two-layer aquifer system, Water Resources Research, 5(4), 803–816, 1969.
105. Neuman, S.P., G.R. Walter, H.W. Bentley, J.J. Ward, and D.D. Gonzalez, Determination of horizontal aquifer anisotropy with three wells, Ground Water, 22(1), 66–72, 1984.
106. Neuzil, C.E., On conducting the modified “slug” test in tight formations, Water Resources Research, 18(2), 439–441, 1982.
107. Nguyen, V. and G.F. Pinder, Direct Calculation of Aquifer Parameters in Slug Test Analysis, Ground Water Hydraulics, Water Resource Monograph 9, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1984.
108. Papadopulos, I.S., J.D. Bredehoeft, and H.H. Cooper, On the analysis of “slug test” data, Water Resources Research, 9(4), 1087–1089, 1973.
109. Parker, J.C. and K.A. Albrecht, Sample volume effects on solute transport predictions, Water Resources Research, 23(12), 2293–2301, 1987.
110. Pickens, J.F. and G.E. Grisak, Scale-dependent dispersion in a stratified aquifer, Water Resources Research, 17(4), 1191–1211, 1981.
111. Poland, J.F. and G.H. Davis, Land Subsidence Due to the Withdrawal of Fluids: Reviews in Engineering Geology II, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1969.
112. Polubarinova-Kochina, N., Theory of Ground Water Movement, R. de Wiest, transl., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962.
113. Powers, J.P., Construction Dewatering, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1981.
114. Prats, M., A method for determining the net vertical permeability near a well from in-situ measurements, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, 249, 637–643, 1970.
115. Ramey, H.J., Jr., Approximate solutions for unsteady liquid flow in composite reservoirs, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 22(2), 1970.
116. Ramey, H.J., Jr., and R.G. Agarwal, Annulus unloading rates as influenced by wellbore storage and skin effect, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, 253, 1972.
117. Riley, F.S., Analysis of Borehole Extensiometer Data From Central California, Proceedings of the Tokyo Symposium on Land Subsidence, IASH-UNESCO, 1969.
118. Sageev, A., Slug test analysis, Water Resources Research, 22(8), 1323–1333, 1986.
119. Sudicky, E.A. and J.A. Cherry, Field observations of tracer dispersion under natural flow conditions in an unconfined sandy aquifer, Water Pollution Research Canada, 14, 1–17, 1979.
120. Taylor, D.W., Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1958.
121. Terzaghi, K. and R.B. Peck, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1948.
122. Theis, C.V., The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground water storage, American Geophysical Union Transactions, 16, 519–524, 1935.
123. Todd, D.K., Ground Water Hydrology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1959.
124. U.S. Department of the Interior, Earth Manual, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1985.
125. van der Kamp, G., Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: the underdamped case, Water Resources Research, 12(1), 71–77, 1976.
126. Walton, W.C., Ground Water Resource Evaluation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1970.
127. Wang, J.S.Y., T.N. Narasimhan, C.F. Tsang, and P.A. Witherspoon, Transient Flow in Tight Fractures, Proceedings of the International Well Testing Symposium, Publication LBL 7027, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 1977.
128. Winterkorn, H.F. and H.Y. Fang, Foundation Engineering Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1975.
129. Yerkes, R.F. and R.O. Castle, Surface Deformation Associated with Soil and Gas-Field Operations in the United States, Proceedings of the Tokyo Symposium on Land Subsidence, IASH-UNESCO, 1969.