Multiscale 3D shape representation and segmentation with applications to hippocampal/caudate extraction from brain MRI

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 374-385

  Gao, Yi ^a   Corn, Benjamin ^b   Schifter, Dan ^b   Tannenbaum, Allen ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Multiscale shape representation; Shape based segmentation

Indexed keywords

3D SHAPE REPRESENTATION; ARBITRARY TOPOLOGY; AUTOMATIC METHOD; BRAIN MRI; GRAY SCALE; IMAGE FEATURES; LOCAL SHAPE; LOW CONTRAST; MEDICAL DATA SETS; MEDICAL IMAGES; MULTISCALE REPRESENTATIONS; MULTISCALES; SEGMENTATION PROCESS; SHAPE BASED; SHAPE CHANGE; SHAPE INFORMATION; SHAPE REPRESENTATION; SHAPE SPACE; SHARP CORNERS; SMALL SCALE; STATISTICAL LEARNING; TARGET OBJECT; TARGET ORGANS; TRAINING IMAGE;

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INFORMATION USE; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; EXTRACTION; HIPPOCAMPUS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84856228498     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AIM@SHAPE, Seahorse data set. (accessed on 20.04.11). http://shapes.aimatshape.net/view.php?id=1382.
2. Aljabar P., Heckemann R., Hammers A., Hajnal J., Rueckert D. Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy. Neuroimage 2009, 46:726-738.
3. Angenent S., Haker S., Tannenbaum A., Kikinis R. On the Laplace-Beltrami operator and brain surface flattening. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18:700-711.
4. Aoyama H., Tago M., Kato N., Toyoda T., Kenjyo M., Hirota S., Shioura H., Inomata T., Kunieda E., Hayakawa K., et al. Neurocognitive function of patients with brain metastasis who received either whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery or radiosurgery alone. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2007, 68:1388-1395.
5. Boykov Y., Kolmogorov V. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2004, 26:1124-1137.
6. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1986, 8:43-57.
7. Caselles V., Kimmel R., Sapiro G. Geodesic active contours. International Journal of Computer Vision 1997, 22:61-79.
8. Chan T., Vese L. Active contours without edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2001, 10:266-277.
9. Chang E., Wefel J., Hess K., Allen P., Lang F., Kornguth D., Arbuckle R., Swint J., Shiu A., Maor M., et al. Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology 2009, 10:1037-1044.
10. Cootes T., Taylor C., Cooper D., Graham J. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1995, 61:38-59.
11. Davatzikos C., Tao X., Shen D. Hierarchical active shape models, using the wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 22:414-423.
12. Dice L. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945, 26:297-302.
13. Geman S., Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1984, 721-741.
14. Ibanez, L., et al., 2003. The ITK software guide. Kitware.
15. Kass M., Witkin A., Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision 1988, 1:321-331.
16. Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, A., Olver, P., Tannenbaum, A., Yezzi, A., 1995. Gradient flows and geometric active contour models. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, 1995, pp. 810-815.
17. Knisely J. Focused attention on brain metastases. The Lancet Oncology 2009, 10:1024.
18. Lankton S., Tannenbaum A. Localizing region-based active contours. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2008, 17:1-11.
19. Leventon, M., Grimson, W., Faugeras, O., 2000. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000, pp. 316-323.
20. Malladi R., Sethian J., Vemuri B. Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1995, 17:158-175.
21. Mcinerney T., Terzopoulos D. Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey. Medical Image Analysis 1996.
22. Michailovich O., Rathi Y., Tannenbaum A. Image segmentation using active contours driven by the bhattacharyya gradient flow. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2007, 16:2787-2801.
23. Nain D., Haker S., Bobick A., Tannenbaum A. Multiscale 3D shape representation and segmentation using spherical wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2007, 26:598-618.
24. Osher S., Sethian J. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1988, 79:12-49.
25. Panjwani D., Healey G. Markov random field models for unsupervised segmentation of textured color images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1995, 939-954.
26. Patchell R. The management of brain metastases. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2003, 29:533-540.
27. Rohlfing T., Brandt R., Menzel R., Russakoff D., Maurer C. Quo vadis, atlas-based segmentation?. Handbook of Biomedical Image Analysis 2005, 435-486.
28. Rousson M., Paragios N., Deriche R. Implicit active shape models for 3D segmentation in MR imaging. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2004, 2004:209-216.
29. Rueckert D., Sonoda L., Hayes C., Hill D., Leach M., Hawkes D. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18.
30. Shi J., Malik J. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000, 22:888-905.
31. Sobel, I., Feldman, G., 1968. A 3x3 isotropic gradient operator for image processing. Presentation for Stanford Artificial Project.
32. Staib L., Duncan J. Model-based deformable surface finding for medical images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1996, 15:720-731.
33. Terzopoulos D., Witkin A., Kass M. Constraints on deformable models: recovering 3d shape and nonrigid motion. Artificial Intelligence 1988, 36:91-123.
34. Tsai A., Yezzi A., Wells W., Tempany C., Tucker D., Fan A., Grimson W., Willsky A. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 22:137-154.
35. Viola P., Wells W. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. International Journal of Computer Vision 1997, 24:137-154.
36. Whitaker R. A level-set approach to 3D reconstruction from range data. International Journal of Computer Vision 1998, 29:231.
37. Yezzi A., Kichenassamy S., Kumar A., Olver P., Tannenbaum A. A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1997, 16:199-209.
38. Yezzi A., Tsai A., Willsky A. A statistical approach to snakes for bimodal and trimodal imagery. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision 1999, 898. IEEE Computer Society.
39. Zhu S., Yuille A. Region competition: unifying snakes, region growing, and Bayes/MDL for multiband image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1996, 884-900.