Creating

Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 81-140

  Molenda, Michael ^a   Boling, Elizabeth ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856224231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203054000     Document Type: Chapter

References (138)

1. Alexander, B. (2004, September/October). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education [Electronic version]. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 29–35.
2. Allen, W. H. (Ed.). (1960). Audio-visual leadership: A summary of the Lake Okoboji Audio-Visual Leadership Conferences, 1955–1959. Iowa City, IA: State University of Iowa.
3. Anglin, G. J., Vaez, H., & Cunningham, K. L. (2004). Visual representations and learning: The role of static and animated graphics. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 865–916). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Appelman, R. (2005). Designing experiential modes: A key focus for immersive learning environments. TechTrends, 49(3), 64–74.
5. Appelman, R., & Boling, E. (2005). R541 Instructional development I syllabus. Retrieved March 29, 2006, from http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eistr541/boling/index.html
6. Barron, A. E. (2004). Auditory instruction. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 949–978). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Barson, J. (1967). Instructional systems development, a demonstration and evaluation project (U.S. Office of Education, Title II-B Project OE 3-16-025). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
8. Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Bichelmeyer, B., & Molenda, M. (2006). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Gradual growth atop tectonic shifts. in M. Orey, V. J. McClendon, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook 2006 (Vol. 31, pp. 3–32). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
10. Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–5.
11. Branson, R. K. (1978, March). The interservice procedures for instructional systems development. Educational Technology, 18(3), 11–14.
12. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Buck, G. H. (2006). The first wave: The beginnings of radio in Canadian distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 75–88.
14. Burke, R. L. (1982). CAI Sourcebook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Burkman, E. (1987). Factors affecting utilization. in R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 429–455). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Carr-Chellman, A., & Savoy, M. (2004). User-design research. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 710–716). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Cambre, M. A. (1981). Historical overview of formative evaluation of instructional media products. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(1), 3–25.
18. Chu, G. C., & Schramm, W. (1968). Learning from television. Washington, DC: NAEB, the National Society of Professionals in Telecommunications.
19. Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
20. Corry, M. D., Frick, T. W., & Hansen, L. (1997). User-centered design and usability testing of a Web site: An illustrative case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 65–76.
21. Dale, E. (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: The Dryden Press.
22. Davis, J. R., & Davis, A. B. (1998). Effective training strategies. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
23. Diamond, R. (1975). Instructional development for individualized learning in higher education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
24. Dick, W. (1997, September/October). Better instructional design theory: Process improvement or reengineering? Educational Technology, 37(5), 47–50.
25. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26. Dills, C. R., & Romiszowski, A. J. (Eds.). (1997). Instructional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
27. Dolezalek, H. (2004, October). Industry report 2004. Training, 41(10), 20–36.
28. Douglas, I. (2006). Issues in software engineering of relevance to instructional design. TechTrends, 50(5), 28–35.
29. Durzo, J. J., Diamond, R. M., & Doughty, P. L. (1979). An analysis of research needs in instructional development. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 4–11.
30. Dwyer, F. M. (1972). A guide for improving visualized instruction. State College, PA: Learning Services.
31. Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.
32. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. in C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 195–206). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
33. Facts you should know about filmstrips. (1965). San Fernando, CA: Frank Holmes Laboratories, Inc.
34. Finn, J. D. (1955). A look at the future of AV communication. Audio-Visual Communication Review3(4), 244–256.
35. Finn, J. D. (1956a). What is educational efficiency? Teaching Tools3(3), 113–114.
36. Finn, J. D. (1956b). AV development and the concept of systems. Teaching Tools3(4), 163–164.
37. Finn, J. D. (1965). Instructional technology. Audiovisual Instruction10(3), 192–194.
38. Fleming, M., & Levie, W. H. (1978). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
39. Fleming, M., & Levie, W. H. (1993). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
40. Foshay, W. R., Silber, K. H., & Stelnicki, M. B. (2003). Writing training materials that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
41. Foster, G. (1993). Managing course design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 198–206.
42. Frick, T., & Boling, E. (2002). Effective Web instruction: Handbook for an inquiry-based process. Unpublished manuscript.
43. Friend, J., Searle, B., & Suppes, P. (1980). Radio mathematics in Nicaragua. Stanford, CA: Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.
44. Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
45. Gagne, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
46. Gagne, R. M., & Medsker, K. L. (1996). The conditions of learning: Training applications. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
47. Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
48. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
49. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
50. Godfrey, E. P. (1967). The state of audiovisual technology: 1961–1966. Washington, DC: Department of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Association.
51. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000, April). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 42–53.
53. Grabinger, R. S. (1996). Rich environments for active learning. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 665–692). New York: Macmillan.
54. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. in C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
55. Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 571–581). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
57. Harless, J. (1973). An analysis of front-end analysis. Improving Human Performance, 2, 229–244.
58. Hartley, J. (1986). Designing instructional text (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
59. Hartley, J. (1996). Designing instructional text and informational text. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 917–947). New York: Macmillan.
60. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1993). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
61. Hoban, C. F., & Van Ormer, E. B. (1970). Instructional film research 1918–1950. New York: Arno Press.
62. Hoffman, J. (2006). Why blended learning hasn’t (yet) fulfilled its promises: Answers to those questions that keep you up at night. in C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 27–40). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
63. Houghton, H. A., & Willows, D. M. (1987). The psychology of illustration: Vol. 2: Instructional issues. New York: Springer-Verlag.
64. Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication: Vol. 3: Studies in social psychology in World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. Jonassen, D. H. (1982). The technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
66. Jonassen, D. H., & Mandl, H. (Eds.). (1990). Designing hypermedia for learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
67. Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. (1999). Task analysis methods for instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Kemp, J., & Smellie, D. C. (1994). Planning, producing, and using instructional technologies. New York: HarperCollins.
69. Kerr, S. (1983). Inside the black box: Making design decisions for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 45–58.
70. Kirkley, S. E., & Kirkley, J. R. (2005). Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games and simulations. TechTrends, 49(3), 42–53, 89.
71. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: the four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
72. Laurel, B. (Ed.). (2003). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
73. Leshin, C. B., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
74. Leonard, G. B. (1968). Education and ecstasy. New York: Delacorte Press.
75. Levenson, W. B., & Stasheff, E. (1952). Teaching through radio and television (Rev. ed.). New York: Rinehart & Co.
76. Lewis, N. J., & Orton, P. Z. (2006). Blended learning for business impact: IBM’s case for learning success. in C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 61–75). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
77. Lohr, L. (2003). Creating graphics for learning and performance: Lessons in visual literacy. New York: Prentice Hall.
78. Lumsdaine, A. A., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (1960). Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book. Washington, DC: Department of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Association.
79. Maguire, S. (1994). Debugging the development process: Practical strategies for staying focused, hitting ship dates, and building solid teams. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
80. Markle, S. M., & Tiemann, P. W. (1967). Programming is a process [Sound filmstrip]. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
81. Mascelli, J. V. (1965). The 5 c’s of cinematography. Beverly Hills, CA: Silman-James Press.
82. McBride, W. (Ed.). (1966). Inquiry: Implications for televised instruction. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
83. McCombs, B. L. (1986). The instructional systems development (ISD) model: A review of those factors critical to its successful implementation. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 31(4), 187–199.
84. Medsker, K. L., & Holdsworth, K. M. (Eds.). (2001). Models and strategies for training design. Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
85. Merrill, M. D. (2002a). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
86. Merrill, M. D. (2002b). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39–44.
87. Merrill, M. D., & ID2 Research Group. (1998). ID Expert™: A second generation instructional development system. Instructional Science, 26, 243–262.
88. Merrill, P. F. (2005). Using XML to separate content from the presentation software in eLearning applications. TechTrends, 49(4), 34–40.
89. Misanchuk, E. R., Schwier, R. A., & Boling, E. (2000). Visual design for instructional multimedia. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: M4 Multimedia & Copestone Publishing.
90. Molenda, M., & Bichelmeyer, B. (2005). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Slow growth as economy recovers. in M. Orey, J. McClendon, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook 2005 (Vol. 30, pp. 3–28). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
91. Molenda, M., & Pershing, J. A. (2004, March/April). The strategic impact model: An integrative approach to performance improvement and instructional systems design. TechTrends, 48(2), 26–32.
92. Mood, A. (1964, April). Some problems inherent in the development of a systems approach to instruction. Paper presented at Conference on New Dimensions for Research in Educational Media Implied by the Systems Approach to Education, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
93. Moore, D. M., Burton, J. K., & Myers, R. J. (2004). Multiple-channel communication: The theoretical and research foundations of multimedia. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 979–1005). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
94. Moore, D. M., & Dwyer, F. M. (Eds.). (1994). Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
95. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
96. Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world: Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
97. Phillips, M. G. (1966). Learning materials and their implementation. Review of Educational Research, 36(3), 373–379.
98. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
100. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory,Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
101. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
102. Rieber, L. P. (2004). Microworlds. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 583–603). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
103. Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
104. Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
105. Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
106. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. in B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
107. Schiffman, S. S. (1986). Instructional systems design: Five views of the field. Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), 14–21.
108. Schoenfeld, J., & Berge, Z. L. (2004). Emerging ISD models for distance training programs. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(1), 29–37.
109. Schramm, W. (1962). Programed instruction: Today and tomorrow. New York: The Fund for the Advancement of Education.
110. Schriver, K. (1997). Dynamics in document design: Creating texts for readers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
111. Schwen, T. M., Leitzman, D. F., Misanchuk, E. R., Foshay, W. R., & Heitland, K. M. (1984). Instructional development: The social implications of technical interventions. in R. K. Bass, & C. R. Dills (Eds.), Instructional development: The state of the art II. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
112. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. in R. E. Stake (Ed.), AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation (No. 1). Chicago: Rand McNally.
113. Seels, B. B., Fullerton, K., Berry, L., & Horn, L. J. (2004). Research on learning from television. in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 249–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
114. Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
115. Shannon, C. E. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
116. Silvern, L. C. (1965). Basic analysis. Los Angeles: Education and Training Consultants Co.
117. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.
118. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
119. Sless, D. (1981). Learning and visual communication. London: Croom Helm.
120. Sless, D. (1986). in search of semiotics. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.
121. South, J. B., & Monson, D. W. (2001). A university-wide system for creating, capturing, and delivering learning objects. in D. A. Wiley II (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved October 4, 2004, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/south.doc
122. Spector, J. M. (2001, October). An overview of progress and problems in educational technology. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 3, 27–37.
123. Spector, J. M., Polson, M. C., & Muraida, D. J. (Eds.). Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
124. Suchman, J. R. (1966). The pattern of inquiry. in W. McBride (Ed.), Inquiry: Implications for televised instruction. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
125. Television in instruction: What is possible. (1970). Washington, DC: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
126. Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38(1), 31–44.
127. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
128. Wagner, E. D. (2005, May/June). Enabling mobile learning [Electronic version]. EDUCAUSE Review, 40, 41–52.
129. Wetzel, C. D., Radtke, P. H., & Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
130. Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
131. Wiley, D. A., II. (2006). RIP-ing on learning objects. Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/230
132. Wiley, D. A., II. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. in D. A. Wiley II (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved September 11, 2004, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc
133. Willis, J., & Wright, K. E. (2000, March/April). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 5–20.
134. Wilson, B. G., Jonassen, D. H., & Cole, P. (1993). Cognitive approaches to instructional design. in G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), The ASTD handbook of instructional technology (pp. 21.1–21.22). New York: McGraw-Hill.
135. Wisher, R. A. (2006). Blended learning in military training. in C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 519–532). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
136. Wood, D. N., & Wylie, D. G. (1977). Educational telecommunications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
137. Zemke, R., & Kramlinger, T. (1982). Figuring things out: A trainer’s guide to needs and task analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
138. Zemke, R., & Rossett, A. (2002, February). A hard look at ISD. Training, 39(2), 27–35.