Efficient implementation of high order inverse Lax-Wendroff boundary treatment for conservation laws

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 231, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2510-2527

  Tan, Sirui ^a   Wang, Cheng ^b   Shu, Chi Wang ^a   Ning, Jianguo ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cartesian mesh; Detonation; Hyperbolic conservation laws; Inverse Lax Wendroff procedure; No penetration conditions; Numerical boundary conditions; Reactive Euler equations

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EULER EQUATIONS; EXTRAPOLATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; INVERSE PROBLEMS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES;

CARTESIAN MESH; CONDITION; EULER'S EQUATION; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; HYPERBOLIC CONSERVATION LAWS; INVERSE LAX-WENDROFF PROCEDURE; NO-PENETRATION CONDITION; NUMERICAL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; REACTIVE EULER EQUATION;

DETONATION;

EID: 84856218762     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.11.037     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bartenev A.M., Khomik S.V., Gelfand B.E., Grönig H., Olivier H. Effect of reflection type on detonation initiation at shock-wave focusing. Shock Waves 2000, 10:205-215.
2. Bourlioux A., Majda A.J. Theoretical and numerical structure of unstable detonations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 1995, 350:29-68.
3. Carpenter M.H., Gottlieb D., Abarbanel S., Don W.-S. The theoretical accuracy of Runge-Kutta time discretizations for the initial boundary value problem: a study of the boundary error. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1995, 16:1241-1252.
4. Gamezo V.N., Desbordes D., Oran E.S. Two-dimensional reactive flow dynamics in cellular detonation waves. Shock Waves 1999, 9:11-17.
5. Gelfand B.E., Khomik S.V., Bartenev A.M., Medvedev S.P., Grönig H., Olivier H. Detonation and deflagration initiation at the focusing of shock waves in combustible gaseous mixture. Shock Waves 2000, 10:197-204.
6. Goldberg M., Tadmor E. Scheme-independent stability criteria for difference approximations of hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. I. Mathematics of Computation 1978, 32:1097-1107.
7. Goldberg M., Tadmor E. Scheme-independent stability criteria for difference approximations of hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. II. Mathematics of Computation 1981, 36:603-626.
8. Guo C., Zhang D., Xie W. The Mach reflection of a detonation based on soot track measurements. Combustion and Flame 2001, 127:2051-2058.
9. Jiang G.-S., Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1996, 126:202-228.
10. Kreiss H.-O., Petersson N.A. A second order accurate embedded boundary method for the wave equation with Dirichlet data. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2006, 27:1141-1167.
11. Kreiss H.-O., Petersson N.A., Yström J. Difference approximations for the second order wave equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2002, 40:1940-1967.
12. Kreiss H.-O., Petersson N.A., Yström J. Difference approximations of the Neumann problem for the second order wave equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2004, 42:1292-1323.
13. Ning J.-G., Chen L.-W. Fuzzy interface treatment in Eulerian method. Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 2004, 47:550-568.
14. Ohyagi S., Obara T., Nakata F., Hoshi S. A numerical simulation of reflection processes of a detonation wave on a wedge. Shock Waves 2000, 10:185-190.
15. Qiu J., Shu C.-W. Finite difference WENO schemes with Lax-Wendroff-type time discretizations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2003, 24:2185-2198.
16. Sharpe G.J., Falle S.A.E.G. Two-dimensional numerical simulations of idealized detonations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 2000, 456:2081-2100.
17. Shi J., Zhang Y.-T., Shu C.-W. Resolution of high order WENO schemes for complicated flow structures. Journal of Computational Physics 2003, 186:690-696.
18. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1988, 77:439-471.
19. Sjögreen B., Petersson N.A. A Cartesian embedded boundary method for hyperbolic conservation laws. Communications in Computational Physics 2007, 2:1199-1219.
20. Tan S., Shu C.-W. Inverse Lax-Wendroff procedure for numerical boundary conditions of conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 2010, 229:8144-8166.
21. Tan S., Shu C.-W. A high order moving boundary treatment for compressible inviscid flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2011, 230:6023-6036.
22. Thomas G.O., Williams R.Ll. Detonation interaction with wedges and bends. Shock Waves 2002, 11:481-492.
23. Wang C., Ma T.-B., Lu J. Influence of obstacle disturbance in a duct on explosion characteristics of coal gas. Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy 2010, 53:269-278.
24. Wang C., Ma T.-B., Ning J.-G. Tracking method for multi-material interfaces and its application in shaped charge. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 2008, 5:1512-1516.
25. Wang G., Zhang D., Liu K., Wang J. An improved CE/SE scheme for numerical simulation of gaseous and two-phase detonations. Computers and Fluids 2010, 39:168-177.
26. Woodward P., Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. Journal of Computational Physics 1984, 54:115-173.
27. Xu S., Aslam T., Stewart D.S. High resolution numerical simulation of ideal and non-ideal compressible reacting flows with embedded internal boundaries. Combustion Theory and Modelling 1997, 1:113-142.
28. Z.-C. Zhang, S.T.J. Yu, H. He, S.-C. Chang, Direct calculations of two- and three-dimensional detonations by an extended CE/SE method, AIAA Paper No. 2001-0476, 2001.