Ectomycorrhizal fungi as an alternative to the use of chemical fertilisers in nursery production of Pinus pinaster

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 95, Issue SUPPL., 2012, Pages

  Sousa, Nadine R ^a   Franco, Albina R ^a   Oliveira, Rui S ^a   Castro, Paula M L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA PORTUGUESA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Ectomycorrhiza; Forest nursery inoculation; Improved plant growth; Maritime pine; Selected ectomycorrhizal fungi

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; MYCELIUM; SOILS;

CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS; ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; ECTOMYCORRHIZAS; FOREST NURSERY INOCULATION; IMPROVED PLANT GROWTH; MARITIME PINES; NURSERY PRODUCTION; PINUS PINASTER; PLANT GROWTH; SELECTED ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGUS;

FERTILIZERS;

FERTILIZER; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONIFEROUS FOREST; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; FOREST SOIL; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; FUNGUS; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH RATE; NURSERY GROUND; SEEDLING; SOIL FERTILITY; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; FOREST; FUNGUS; GREENHOUSE; LACCARIA LACCATA; LACTARIUS DETERRIMUS; NONHUMAN; PINE; PINUS PINASTER; PISOLITHUS TINCTORIUS; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; RHIZOPOGON VULGARIS; SCLERODERMA CITRINUM; SEED INOCULATION; SOIL; SUILLUS BOVINUS; THELEPHORA TERRESTRIS;

CONIFEROPHYTA; FUNGI; LACCARIA LACCATA; LACTARIUS DETERRIMUS; PINUS PINASTER; PISOLITHUS TINCTORIUS; RHIZOPOGON VULGARIS; SCLERODERMA CITRINUM; SUILLUS BOVINUS; THELEPHORA TERRESTRIS;

EID: 84856216195     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agerer R. Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae 1998, Einhorn-Verlag, Schäwbish Gmünd.
2. Agerer R. Exploration type of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 2001, 11:107-114.
3. Autoridade Florestal Nacional Inventário Florestal Nacional 2009, http://www.afn.min-agricultura.pt/portal/ifn.
4. Brundrett M., Bougher N., Dell B., Grove T., Malajczuk N. Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture 1996, Pirie Printers, Canberra, Australia, pp. 173-216.
5. Castellano M.A., Molina R. Mycorrhizae. The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Agric. Handbk. 674 1989, vol. 5:101-167. U.S.D.A. For. Serv., Washington D.C. T.D. Landis, R.W. Tinus, S.E. McDonald, J.P. Barnett (Eds.).
6. Chalot M., Javelle A., Blaudez D., Lambilliote R., Cooke R., Sentenac H., Wipf D., Botton B. An update on nutrient transport processes in ectomycorrhizas. Plant Soil 2002, 244:165-175.
7. Colpaert J.V., Van Tichelen K.K., Van Assche J.A., Van Laere A. Short-term phosphorus uptake rates in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots of intact Pinus sylvestris seedlings. New Phytol. 1999, 143:589-597.
8. Conjeaud C., Scheromm P., Moussain D. Effects of phosphorus and ectomycorrhiza on maritime pine seedlings (Pinus pinaster). New Phytol. 1996, 133:345-351.
9. Duñabeitia M.K., Hormilla S., Garcia-Plazaola J.I., Txarterina K., Arteche U., Becerril J.M. Differential responses of three fungal species to environmental factors and their role in the mycorrhization on Pinus radiata D. Don. Mycorrhiza 2004, 14:11-18.
10. Entry J.A., Sojka R.E. Matrix based fertilizers reduce nitrogen and phosphorus leaching in three soils. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 87:364-372.
11. González-Ochoa A.I., Heras J., Torres P., Sánchez-Gómez E. Mycorrhization of Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinaster Aiton seedlings in two commercial nurseries. Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60:43-48.
12. Liu Q., Loganathan P., Hedley M.J., Grace L.J. Effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on rhizosphere properties, phosphorus uptake and growth of pine seedlings treated with and without a phosphate rock fertilizer. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31:137-156.
13. Marx D.H. The influence of ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections. I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 1969, 59:153-163.
14. Nieto M.P., Carbone S.S. Characterization of juvenile maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) ectomycorrhizal fungal community using morphotyping, direct sequencing and fruitbodies sampling. Mycorrhiza 2009, 19:91-98.
15. Novozamsky I., Houba V.J.G., Van Eck R., Van Vark W. A novel digestion technique for multi-element plant analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1983, 14:239-248.
16. Parladé J., Alvarez I.F. Coinoculation of aseptically grown Douglas fir with pairs of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 1993, 3:93-96.
17. Parladé J., Alvarez I.F., Pêra J. Coinoculation of containerized Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) seedlings with the ectomycorrhizal fungi Laccaria bicolor and Rhizopogon spp. Mycorrhiza 1999, 8:189-195.
18. Pera J., Alvarez I.F. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of Pinus pinaster. Mycorrhiza 1995, 5:193-200.
19. Quoreshi A.M., Piché Y., Khasa D.P. Field performance of conifer and hardwood species 5 years after nursery inoculation in the Canadian Prairie Provinces. New For. 2008, 35:235-253.
20. Reddy M.S., Natarajan K. Coinoculation efficacy of ectomycorrhizal fungi on Pinus patula seedlings in a nursery. Mycorrhiza 1997, 7:133-138.
21. Rigou L., Mignard E., Plassard C., Arvieu J.C., Remy J.C. Influence of ectomycorrhizal infection on the rhizosphere pH around roots of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Soland in Ait.). New Phytol. 1995, 130:141-147.
22. Rincón A., Parladé J., Pera J. Effects of ectomycorrhizal inoculation and the type of substrate on mycorrhization, growth and nutrition of containerised Pinus pinea L. seedlings produced in a commercial nursery. Ann. For. Sci. 2005, 62:817-822.
23. Rincón A., Parladé J., Pera J. Influence of the fertilisation method in controlled ectomycorrhizal inoculation of two Mediterranean pines. Ann. For. Sci. 2007, 64:577-583.
24. Selosse M.A., Bouchard D., Martin F., Le Tacon F. Effect of Laccaria bicolor strains inoculated on Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) several years after nursery inoculation. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30:360-371.
25. Shaw C.G., Sidle R.C., Harris A.S. Evaluation of planting sites common to a southeast Alaska clear-cut. III. Effects of microsite type and ectomycorrhizal inoculation on growth and survival of Sitka spruce seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 1987, 17:334-339.
26. Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M., Haan C. Livestock's Long Shadow. Environmental Issues and Options 2006, LEAD and FAO, Rome.
27. Syers J.K., Johnston A.E., Curtin D. Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use. Reconciling changing concept of soil phosphorus behaviour with agronomic information. FAO Fertil. Plant Nutr. Bull. 2008, 18. Rome.
28. Vaario L., Tervonen A., Haukioja K., Haukioja M., Pennanen T., Timonen S. The effect of nursery substrate and fertilization on the growth and ectomycorrhizal status of containerized and outplanted seedlings of Picea abies. Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39:64-75.
29. Vosátka M., GajdoŠ J., Kolomý P., Kavková M., Oliveira R.S., Franco A.R., Sousa N.R., Carvalho M.F., Castro P.M.L., Albrechtová J. Applications of ectomycorrhizal inocula in nursery and field plantings: the importance of inoculum tuning to target conditions. Mycorrhiza Works 2008, 112-125. German Phytomedical Society, Braunschweig, Germany. F. Feldmann, Y. Kapulnik, J. Baar (Eds.).
30. Walinga I., Van Vark W., Houba V.J.G., van der Lee J.J. Plant Analysis Procedures (Soil and Plant Analysis, Part 7) 1989, Syllabus, Wageningen, 264 p.
31. Walker R.F. Growth and nutritional responses of containerized sugar and Jeffrey pine seedlings to controlled release fertilization and induced mycorrhization. For. Ecol. Manage. 2001, 149:163-179.