Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: The Design/Creativity Loops model

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 111-130

  Clinton, Gregory ^a   Hokanson, Brad ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity; Design; Instructional design; Instructional development; Instructional systems design; Mental models; Problem solving; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856216109     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-011-9216-3     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Abbott, D. H. (2010). Constructing a creative self-efficacy inventory: A mixed methods inquiry. Unpublished dissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
2. Akin, Ö. (1994). Creativity in design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 9-21.
3. Akin, Ö., & Lin, C. (1995). Design protocol data and novel design decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236.
4. Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.
7. Archer, B. (1979). Whatever became of design methodology? Design Studies, 1, 17-20.
8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Bennett, S. (2009). Investigating strategies for using related cases to support design problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 459-480.
10. Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287-296.
11. Blicblau, A. S., & Steiner, J. M. (1998). Fostering creativity through engineering projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23, 55-65.
12. Boden, M. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103, 347-356.
13. Boling, E. (2006). Summer studio: Experiencing design culture and habits within an ID graduate program. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX.
14. Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1-8. Retrieved 12 October 2010 from http://scholarworks. iu. edu/journals/index. php/ijdl/index.
15. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.
16. Bruning, R. H., Shraw, G. J., & Norby, M. M. (2010). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
17. Caropreso, E. J., & Couch, R. A. (1996). Creativity and innovation in instructional design and development: The individual in the workplace. Educational Technology, 36(6), 31-39.
18. Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to "be creative" across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89-110.
19. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1998). Technology or craft: What are we doing? Educational Technology, 38(5), 5-11.
20. Clinton, G. (2005, Oct). Graduate student experiences of creativity and flow during training in design and development. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, FL.
21. Clinton, G. (2007). Creativity and design: A study of the learning experience of instructional design and development graduate students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
22. Clinton, G., & Rieber, L. P. (2010). The studio experience at the University of Georgia: An example of constructionist learning for adults. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 755-780.
23. Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297-312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Conole, G., Brasher, A., & Cross, S. (2008). Visualising learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity. Educational Media International, 45(3), 177-194.
25. Court, A. W. (1998). Improving creativity in engineering design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 141-154.
26. Cox, G. (2005). Cox review of creativity in business. Retrieved 26 Feb 2006 from http://www. hm-treasury. gov. uk/.
27. Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3, 221-227.
28. Cross, N. (1997). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies, 18, 427-440.
29. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
30. de Young, L. (1996). Organizational support for software design. In T. Winograd (Ed.), Bringing design to software. New York: ACM Press/Addison Wesley.
31. Dennis, A. R., & Williams, M. L. (2003). Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 160-178). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Berkeley Publishing Group.
33. Dick, W. (1995a). Instructional design and creativity: A response to the critics. Educational Technology, 5(4), 5-11.
34. Dick, W. (1995b). Response to Gordon Rowland on "Instructional design and creativity.". Educational Technology, 35(5), 23-24.
35. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. L. (2008). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Merrill.
36. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169-186). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
39. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham and Gandhi. NewYork: Basic Books.
40. Gero, J. S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: Concepts and framework. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(7), 435-448.
41. Gero, J. S. (2002). Computational models of creative designing based on situated cognition. In T. Hewett & T. Kavanagh (Eds.), Creativity and cognition (pp. 3-10). New York: ACM.
42. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 42-45.
43. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources.
44. Heinich, R. (1984). The proper study of instructional technology. Educational Communication and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 32(2), 67-87.
45. Hill, J. R. (1998). Dorothie: An expert system for training development (project report). Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center.
46. Hokanson, B., & Miller, C. (2009). Role-based design: A contemporary framework for innovation and creativity in instructional design. Educational Technology, 49(2), 21-28.
47. Honebein, P. C. (2009). Transmergent learning and the creation of extraordinary educational experiences. Educational Technology, 49(1), 27-34.
48. Hooker, C., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The group as mentor: Social capital and the systems model of creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 225-244). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.). (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
51. Kelley, D., & Hartfield, B. (1996). The designer's stance. In T. Winograd (Ed.), Bringing design to software. New York: ACM Press/Addison Wesley.
52. Kenney, R. F., Zhang, A., Schwier, R. A., & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions unasked. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1), 9-26.
53. Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think. London: The Architectural Press, Ltd.
54. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
55. Luppicini, R. (2003). Reflective action instructional design (RAID): A designer's aid. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 75-82.
56. Mathisen, G. E., & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21-29.
57. McNeill, T., & Gero, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design, 10(3), 129-140.
58. Molenda, M., & Boling, E. (2008). Creating. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 81-139). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Molenda, M., Reigeluth, C. M., & Nelson, L. M. (2003). Instructional design. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 574-578). London: Nature Publishing Group.
60. National Center on Education and the Economy. (2007). Tough choices or tough times: The report of the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
62. Nemeth, C. J., & Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 63-84). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
63. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392-430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Norman, D. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 110-136). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
67. Penney, C. G., Godsell, A., Scott, A., & Balsom, R. (2004). Problem variables that promote incubation effects. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 35-55.
68. Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213-225). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Reigeluth, C. M., Bunderson, C. V., & Merrill, D. M. (1978). Is there a design science of instruction? Journal of Instructional Development, 1(2), 11-16.
72. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
73. Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world's most creative people. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
74. Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 79-91.
75. Rowland, G. (1995). Instructional design and creativity: Response to the criticized. Educational Technology, 35(5), 17-22.
76. Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 62-92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77. Schack, G. D. (1989). Self-efficacy as a mediator in the creative productivity of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12(3), 231-249.
78. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Burlington, VT: Ashgrove Publishing.
79. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388.
81. Shambaugh, R. N., & Magliaro, S. G. (2001). A reflexive model for teaching instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 69-91.
82. Silvia, P. J., & Phillips, A. G. (2004). Self-awareness, self-evaluation, and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1009-1017.
83. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116-133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 304-325). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
85. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
86. Smith, G. C., & Tabor, P. (1996). The role of the artist-designer. In T. Winograd (Ed.), Bringing design to software. New York: ACM Press/Addison Wesley.
87. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88. Stokes, P. D. (2006). Creativity from constraints. New York: Springer.
89. Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1992). Self-evaluation and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 259-265.
90. Tischler, L. (2006). The Gucci killers. Fast Company. January/February, 42-48.
91. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking (Test). Lexington, MA: Personnel Press/Ginn and Co./Xerox Education Co.
92. Tripp, S. (1994). How should instructional designers be educated? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 116-126.
93. Visscher-Voerman, I., & Gustafson, K. (2004). Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 69-89.
94. Wallas, G. (1954/1988). Stages in the creative process. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausmann (Eds.). The creativity question (pp. 69-73). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
95. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
96. Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
97. West, R. E. (2009). What is shared? A framework for understanding shared innovation within communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 315-332.
98. West, R. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2010). Learning to design collaboratively: Participation of student designers in a Community of Innovation. Instructional Science. Retrieved 25 February 2011 from http://www. springerlink. com/index/10. 1007/s11251-010-9156-z.
99. Williams, W. M., & Yang, L. T. (1999). Organizational creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
100. Willis, J., & Wright, K. E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40(2), 5-20.
101. Wroblewski, D. A. (1991). The construction of human-computer interfaces considered as a craft. In J. Karat (Ed.), Taking software design seriously (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.