The impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration: A quantitative review of the research literature

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 6-28

  Lasher, Michael P ^a   McGrath, Robert J ^a  

^a Vermont Department of Corrections   (United States)

Author keywords

community notification; Megan's Law; offender reintegration; sex offender; SORNA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; REGISTER; REVIEW; SAFETY; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIALIZATION; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

ADULT; CHILD; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR; DUTY TO WARN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PUBLIC OPINION; REGISTRIES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SAFETY; SEX OFFENSES; SOCIALIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856208542     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: 15526933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X10387524     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Anderson A. L., Sample L. L.. Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2008 ; 19: 371-396
2. Andrews D. A., Bonta J. The psychology of criminal conduct. 2006 ). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson ; 2006 :
3. Appelbaum P. S.. Sex offenders in the community: Are current approaches counterproductive?. Psychiatric Services. 2008 ; 59: 352-354
4. Aos S., Miller M., Drake E. Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy ; 2006 :
5. Barnes J. C., Dukes T., Tewksbury R., De Troye T. M.. Analyzing the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2009 ; 20: 21-43
6. Barnoski R. Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Notification levels and recidivism. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy ; 2005 :
7. Beck V. S., Travis L. F.. Sex offender notification and protective behavior. Violence and Victims. 2004 ; 19: 289-302 (Pubitemid 39655367)
8. Brannon T. N., Levenson J. S., Fortney T., Baker J. N.. Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2007 ; 19: 369-379
9. Burchfield K. B., Mingus W.. Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders' experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2008 ; 35: 356-374
10. Caputo A. A., Brodsky S. L.. Citizen coping with community notification of released sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2004 ; 22: 239-252 (Pubitemid 38529417)
11. Community notification and education. Silver Spring, MD: Author ; 2001 :
12. Legislative tends in sex offender management. Silver Spring, MD: Author ; 2008 :
13. Chajewski M., Mercado C. C.. An evaluation of sex offender residency restriction functioning in town, county, and city-wide jurisdictions. Criminal Justice and Policy Review. 2009 ; 20: 44-61
14. Cumming G. F., McGrath R. J. Supervision of the sex offender: Community management, risk assessment, and treatment. 2005 ). Supervision of the sex offender: Community management, risk assessment, and treatment (2nd ed.). Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press ; 2005 :
15. Drake E. K., Aos S. Does sex offender registration and notification reduce crime? A systematic review of the research literature. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy ; 2009 :
16. Drapeau M., Körner C. A., Brunet L., Granger L.. Treatment at La Macaza Clinic: A qualitative study of the sexual offenders' perspective. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice. 2004 ; 46: 27-44 (Pubitemid 38355014)
17. Duwe G., Donnay W.. The impact of Megan's Law on sex recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology. 2008 ; 46: 411-446
18. Duwe G., Donnay W., Tewksbury R.. Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2008 ; 35: 484-504
19. Farkas M. A., Miller G.. Reentry and reintegration: Challenges faced by families of convicted sex offenders. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2007 ; 20: 88-92
20. Farkas M. A., Zevitz R.. Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact on law enforcement: A research note. Journal of Crime and Justice. 2000 ; 23: 125-139
21. Freeman N. J., Sandler J. C.. The Adam Walsh Act: A false sense of security or an effective public policy initiative?. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2010 ; 21: 31-49
22. Gaines J.. Law enforcement reactions to sex offender registration and community notification. Police Practice and Research. 2006 ; 7: 249-267
23. Hanson R. K., Bourgon G., Helmus L., Hodgson S.. The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2009 ; 36: 865-891
24. Hanson R. K., Morton-Bourgon K. E. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessment for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety Canada ; 2007 :
25. Kernsmith P. D., Comartin E., Craun S. W., Kernsmith R. M.. The relationship between sex offender registry utilization and awareness. Sexual Abuse. 2009 ; 21: 181-193
26. Letourneau E. J., Levenson J. S., Brandyptadhyay D., Armstrong K. S., Sinha D.. Effects of South Carolina's sex offender registration and notification policy on deterrence of adult sex crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010 ; 37: 357-552
27. Levenson J. S., Brannon T. N., Fortney T., Baker J. N.. Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2007 ; 7: 1-25
28. Levenson J. S., Cotter L. P.. The effect of Megan's Law on sex offender reintegration. International Journal of Criminal Justice. 2005 ; 21: 49-66
29. Levenson J. S., D'Amora D. A., Hern A. L.. Megan's Law and its impact on community reintegration for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2007 ; 25: 587-602 (Pubitemid 47320292)
30. Levenson J. S., Fortney T., Baker J. N.. Views of sexual abuse professionals about sex offender notification policies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2010 ; 54: 150-168
31. Levenson J. S., Tewksbury R.. Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice. 2009 ; 34: 54-68
32. Levenson J. S., Zgoba K. M., Tewksbury R.. Sex offender residence restrictions: Sensible crime policy or flawed logic?. Federal Probation. 2007 ; 71: 2-9
33. Lieb R., Nunlist C. Community notification as viewed by Washington's citizens: A 10-year follow-up. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy ; 2008 :
34. Lösel F., Schmucker M.. The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2005 ; 1: 117-146 (Pubitemid 41310192)
35. Makkai T., Braithwaite J.. Reintegrative shaming and compliance with regulatory standards. Criminology. 1994 ; 32: 361-386
36. Malesky A., Keim J.. Mental health professional's perspectives on sex offender registry web sites. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2001 ; 13: 53-63
37. McGrath R. J., Cumming G. F., Burchard B. L., Zeoli S., Ellerby L. Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press ; 2010 :
38. McGrath R. J., Cumming G. F., Lasher M. P. Impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration before and after passage of a Megan's Law. Burlington: Vermont Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Sexual Abuse ; 2009 :
39. Mercado C. C., Alvarez S., Levenson J.. The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2008 ; 20: 188-205
40. Mustaine E. E., Tewsksbury R., Stengel K. M.. Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence?. Deviant Behavior. 2006a ; 27: 329-350 (Pubitemid 44011815)
41. Mustaine E. E., Tewksbury R., Stengel K. M.. Residential location and mobility of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice. 2006b ; 30: 177-192
42. Petrosino A. J., Petrosino C.. The public safety potential of Megan's Law in Massachusetts: An assessment from a sample of criminal sexual psychopaths. Crime & Delinquency. 1999 ; 45: 140-158
43. PrescottJ. J.RockoffJ. E. (2008). Do sex offender registration and notification laws affect criminal behavior? (NBER Working Paper No. 13803). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
44. Redlich A. D.. Community notification: Perceptions of its effectiveness in preventing child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 2001 ; 10: 91-116 (Pubitemid 34522340)
45. Robbers M. L. P.. Lifers on the outside. Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2009 ; 53: 5-28
46. Rosenfield S.. Labeling and mental illness: The effects of received services and perceived stigma on life satisfaction. American Sociological Review. 1997 ; 64: 660-672 (Pubitemid 127574911)
47. Saad L. Sex offender registries are underutilized by the public. Washington, DC: Gallup ; 2005 :
48. Salmon T. M. Sex offender registry: Report of the Vermont State Auditor. Montpelier, VT: Office of the State Auditor ; 2010 :
49. Schram D. D., Milloy C. Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy ; 1995 :
50. ShaoL.LiJ. (2006). The effect of sex offender registration laws on rape victimization. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alabama.
51. Sherman L. W.. Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 1993 ; 30: 445-473 (Pubitemid 23323676)
52. Socia K. M., Stamatel J. P.. Assumption and evidence behind sex offender laws: Registration, community notification, and residence restrictions. Sociology Compass. 2010 ; 4: 1-20
53. Tewksbury R.. Validity and reliability of the Kentucky sex offender registry. Federal Probation. 2002 ; 66: 21-26
54. Tewksbury R.. Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation. 2004 ; 68: 30-34
55. Tewksbury R.. Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 2005 ; 21: 67-82
56. Tewksbury R.. Exile at home: The unintended collateral consequences of sex offender residency restrictions. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. 2007 ; 42: 531-540
57. Tewksbury R., Jennings W. G.. Assessing the impact of sex offender registration and community notification on sex-offending trajectories. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010 ; 37: 570-582
58. Tewksbury R., Lees M.. Consequences of sex offender registration. Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum. 2006 ; 26: 309-334 (Pubitemid 43393137)
59. Tewksbury R., Lees M.. Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency. 2007 ; 53: 380-407
60. Tewksbury R., Levenson J.. Stress experiences of family members of registered sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2009 ; 27: 611-626
61. Tewksbury R., Mustaine E. E.. Collateral consequences and community re-entry for registered sex offenders with child victims: Are the challenges even greater?. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2007 ; 46: 113-131
62. Tewksbury R., Mustaine E. E.. Where registered sex offenders live: Community characteristics and proximity to possible victims. Victims & Offenders. 2008 ; 3: 86-98
63. Tewksbury R., Zgoba K. M.. Perceptions and coping with punishment: How registered sex offenders respond to stress, Internet restrictions, and collateral consequences of registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2010 ; 54: 537-551
64. Turley E., Hutzel L. West Virginia sex offender study. Charlestown, WV: Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Center ; 2001 :
65. Veysey B. M., Zgoba K. M.. Sex offenses and offenders reconsidered: An investigation of characteristics and correlates over time. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010 ; 37: 583-595
66. Welchans S.. Megan's Law: Evaluations of sexual offender registries. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2005 ; 16: 123-140 (Pubitemid 40781579)
67. Wilson R. J., Cortoni F., McWhinnie A. J.. Circles of support and accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2009 ; 21: 412-430
68. Zandbergen P. A., Hart T. C.. Geocoding accuracy considerations in determining residency restrictions for sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2009 ; 20: 62-90
69. Zandbergen P. A., Levenson J. S., Hart T. C.. Residential proximity to schools and daycares: An empirical analysis of sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010 ; 37: 482-502
70. Zevitz R. G., Farkas M. A.. The impact of sex-offender community notification on probation/parole in Wisconsin. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2000a ; 44: 8-21 (Pubitemid 30080405)
71. Zevitz R. G., Farkas M. A. Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice ; 2000b :
72. Zgoba K., Witt P., Dalessandro M., Veysey B. Megan's Law: Assessing the practical and monetary efficacy. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Corrections ; 2008 :
73. Zgoba K. M., Levenson J., McKee T.. Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2009 ; 20: 91-110