Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary takes us?

Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-46

  Hertting, Nils ^a   Vedung, Evert ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

accountability; evaluation theory; goal achievement criterion; network governance; stakeholder evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856204680     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389011431021     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bianco W,Bates R.Cooperation by design: leadership, structure, and collective dilemmas.American Political Science Review. 1991;84 (1): 133-47.
2. Carlsson LSamhällets oregerlighet: Organisering och policyproduktion i näringspolitiken. Stockholm: Symposium Graduale; 1993:.
3. Carlsson L.Non-hierarchical evaluation of policy.Evaluation. 2000;6 (2): 201-16.
4. Chisholm DCoordination without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1989:.
5. Clarke AEvaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. London: SAGE; 1999:.
6. De Bruijn JA,Ringeling ABManaging Complex Networks: Strategies for The Public Sector. Kickert WJMKlijn E-HKoppenjan JFM, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:35-61.
7. De Bruijn JA,Ten Heuvelhof EFManaging Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. Kickert WJMKlijn E-HKoppenjan JFM, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:119-126.
8. Dunsire AModern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Kooiman J, ed. London: SAGE; 1993:.
9. Elster JDeliberative Democracy. Elster J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
10. Fischer FDeliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Hajer MAWagenaar H, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
11. Foss Hansen HEvaluering i staten: Kontrol, læring eller forandring. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur; 2003:.
12. Goodin REReflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
13. Guba EG,Lincoln YSFourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1989:.
14. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Hajer MAWagenaar H, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
15. Hansen MB,Vedung E.Theory-based stakeholder evaluation.American Journal of Evaluation. 2010;31 (3): 295-313.
16. Hay CPolitical Analysis: A Critical Introduction. London: Palgrave/MacMillan; 2002:.
17. Haynes P.Complexity theory and evaluation in public management.Public Management Review. 2008;10 (3): 401-19.
18. Hertting NSamverkan på spel: Rationalitet och frustration i nätverksstyrning och svensk stadsdelsförnyelse. Stockholm: Égalit; 2003:.
19. Hertting NTheories of Democratic Network Governance. Sørensen ETorfing J, ed. London: Palgrave-MacMillan; 2007:43-60.
20. Hertting N.Neighborhood network governance, ethnic organization, and the prospects for political integration.Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2009;24 (1): 127-45.
21. Hertting N,Vedung EDen utvärderingstäta politiken: Styrning och utvärdering i svensk storstadspolitik. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2009:.
22. Hjern B.Illegitimate democracy: a case for multiorganizational policy analysis.Policy Currents. 1992;2:1-5.
23. Hood C,Jackson MAdministrative Argument. London: Gower; 1991:.
24. Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector: The Bielefeld Interdisciplinary Project. Kaufmann F-XMajone GOstrom V, ed. Berlin: W. de Gruyter; 1986:.
25. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. Kickert WJMKlijn E-HKoppenjan JFM, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:.
26. Klijn E-HManaging Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. Kickert WJMKlijn E-HKoppenjan JFM, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:14-34.
27. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Klijn E-HEdelenbos JSørensen ETorfing J, ed. London: Palgrave-MacMillan; 2007:199-214.
28. Klijn E-H,Teisman GRManaging Complex Networks: Strategies for The Public Sector. Kickert WJMKlijn E-HKoppenjan JFM, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:98-118.
29. Koppenjan JFM,Klijn E-HManaging Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge; 2004:.
30. Lindblom CThe Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press; 1965:.
31. Ostrom EThe Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press; 1985 [1973]:.
32. Ostrom EGoverning the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
33. O'Toole LJ,Hanf KI,Hupe PLManaging Complex Networks: Strategies for The Public Sector. Kickert WJMKlijn E-HKoppenjan JFM, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:137-51.
34. Papadopolus Y.Cooperative forms of governance: problems of democratic accountability in complex environments.European Journal of Political Research. 2003;42:473-501.
35. Governance, Politics, and the State. Pierre JPeters GB, ed. New York: St. Martin's Press; 2000:.
36. Pollitt CThe Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003:.
37. Provan KG,Kenis P.Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness.Journal of Public Administration & Theory. 2007;18:229-52.
38. Provan KG,Milward HB.Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks.Public Administration Review. 2001;61 (4): 479-516.
39. Rhodes RAWUnderstanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997:.
40. Rossi PH,Freeman HEEvaluation: A Systematic Approach. 1985) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (3rd Edition). London: SAGE.Lipsey MW, ed. London: SAGE; 1985:.
41. Rossi PH,Freeman HEEvaluation: A Systematic Approach. 1989) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (4th Edition). London: SAGE.Lipsey MW, ed. London: SAGE; 1989:.
42. Rossi PH,Freeman HEEvaluation: A Systematic Approach. 1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (6th Edition). London: SAGE.Lipsey MW, ed. London: SAGE; 1999:.
43. Sanderson I.Evaluation in complex policy systems.Evaluation. 2001;6 (4): 433-54.
44. Scharpf FWInterorganizational Policy Making. Hanf KScharpf FW, ed. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE; 1978:345-70.
45. Scharpf FW.Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations.Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1994;6 (1): 27-53.
46. Scharpf FWGames Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997:.
47. Simon HA.The architecture of complexity.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1962;106:467-82.
48. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Sørensen ETorfing J, ed. London: Palgrave-MacMillan; 2007a:.
49. Sørensen E,Torfing JTheories of Democratic Network Governance. Sørensen ETorfing J, ed. London: Palgrave-MacMillan; 2007b:.
50. Uusikylä P,Valovirta V.Three spheres of performance governance: spanning the boundaries from single-organization focus towards a partnership network.Evaluation. 2007;13 (4): 399-419.
51. Van der Meer F-B,Edelenbos J.Evaluation in multi-actor policy processes: accountability, learning and co-operation.Evaluation. 2006;12 (2): 201-18.
52. Vedung EPublic Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 1997:.
53. Vedung ECarrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Bemelmans-Videc M-LRist RCVedung E, ed. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Transaction; 1998:21-58.
54. Vedung EKonsten att utvärdera nätverk. Helsinki: Stakes; 2006:.
55. Williamson OEThe Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996:.