The EnzymeTracker: An open-source laboratory information management system for sample tracking

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Triplet, Thomas ^a,b   Butler, Gregory ^a,b  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^b Centre for Structural and Functional Genomics   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACCESS CONTROL; DATA-MINING TOOLS; INHERENT LIMITATIONS; LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; PROPRIETARY SYSTEMS; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; WEB BASED LABORATORIES;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; LABORATORIES; SPREADSHEETS; TOOLS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; ENZYMOLOGY; FUNGUS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; QUALITY CONTROL;

ALGORITHMS; CLINICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, GENETIC; FUNGI; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84856104399     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-15     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gordon KJ. Spreadsheet or database: Which makes more sense?. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 1999, 10(2):111-116.
2. Pemberton J, Robson A. Spreadsheets in business. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2000, 100(8):379-388.
3. Denardo EV. The Science of Decision Making: A Problem-Based Approach Using Excel. OR/MS Today 2001, 28(4).
4. Gansel BB. About the Limitations of Spreadsheet Applications in Business Venturing. Operations Research Proceedings, Volume 2007 of Operations Research Proceedings 2008, 219-223. Heidelberg: Springer, Kalcsics J, Nickel S, Berlin.
5. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007, 316(5827):1036-9. 10.1126/science.1136099, 17431139.
6. Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Collaboration and Team Science: A Field Guide. 2010, Tech. rep., National Institutes of Health.
7. Schmitt CP, Burchinal M. Data management practices for collaborative research. Frontiers in psychiatry/Frontiers Research Foundation 2011, 2:47. 3143734, 21811476.
8. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 5.
9. LABVANTAGE Solutions Inc How differences in technology affect LIMS functionality, cost & ROI. 2011, Tech. rep, LABVANTAGE Solutions Inc.
10. Sapio Sciences Examplar LIMS. 2010, Sapio Sciences., http://www.sapiosciences.com/LIMS/index.html
11. Wood S. Comprehensive Laboratory Informatics: A Multilayer Approach. American Laboratory 2007,
12. Goomedic 15 Free and Open source LIMS: Laboratory information management system programs and projects. 2010, Goomedic., http://www.goomedic.com/15-free-and-open-source-lims-laboratory-information-management-system-programs-and-projects.html
13. Stocker G, Fischer M, Rieder D, Bindea G, Kainz S, Oberstolz M, McNally JG, Trajanoski Z. iLAP a workflow-driven software for experimental protocol development, data acquisition and analysis. BMC bioinformatics 2009, 10:390. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-390, 2789074, 19941647.
14. Daley D, Lemire M, Akhabir L, Chan-Yeung M, He JQ, McDonald T, Sandford A, Stefanowicz D, Tripp B, Zamar D, Bosse Y, Ferretti V, Montpetit A, Tessier MC, Becker A, Kozyrskyj AL, Beilby J, McCaskie PA, Musk B, Warrington N, James A, Laprise C, Palmer LJ, Paré PD, Hudson TJ. Analyses of associations with asthma in four asthma population samples from Canada and Australia. Human genetics 2009, 125(4):445-59. 10.1007/s00439-009-0643-8, 19247692.
15. Google Inc Google Docs. 2011, Google Inc., http://docs.google.com
16. Microsoft Corporation Office Web Apps. 2011, Microsoft Corporation., http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/web-apps
17. Corporation ZOHO. Office Suite. 2011, , http://www.zoho.com
18. Kniskern K. Microsoft explains the DNS service outage of. 2011, , http://www.liveside.net/2011/09/20/microsoft-explains-the-dns-service-outage-of-september-8/
19. Krane. The Reasons For Google's Data Loss. 2011, , http://www.dataloss.com/?p=67
20. Rasband W. ImageJ. 2010, , http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
21. Codd E, Codd S, Salley C. Providing OLAP to User-Analysts: An IT Mandate. 1993, Tech. rep., Codd & Date, Inc, San Jose, CA, USA.
22. Garrett JJ. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web 2002, Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
23. Garrett JJ. Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications. 2005, , http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000385.php
24. W3schools Browser Display Statistics. 2011, W3schools., http://www.w3schools.com/BROWSERS/browsers_display.asp
25. Sencha Inc ExtJS 3.0. 2009, Sencha Inc., http://www.sencha.com/products/extjs3/
26. Oracle Inc MySQL: The world's most popular open source database. 2011, Oracle Inc., http://www.mysql.com/
27. The PHP Group PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor. 2006, The PHP Group., http://www.php.net/
28. Mewp LightOpenID. 2010, Mewp., http://gitorious.org/lightopenid
29. Zorn W. High Performance JavaScript Vector Graphics Library. 2009, , http://www.walterzorn.de/en/jsgraphics/jsgraphics_e.htm
30. Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1959, 1:269-271.
31. The Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology (GO) project in 2006. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34:D322-D326. 1347384, 16381878, The Gene Ontology Consortium.
32. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, Rao BS, Smirnov S, Sverdlov AV, Vasudevan S, Wolf YI, Yin JJ, Natale DA. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:41. 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41, 222959, 12969510.
33. National Center for Biotechnology Information Entrez Utilities Web Service. 2009, National Center for Biotechnology Information., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/static/esoap_help.html
34. Google Inc Chart Tools. 2011, Google Inc., http://code.google.com/apis/chart/