DNS analysis of turbulent mixing in two-phase flows

International Journal of Multiphase Flow

Volumn 40, Issue , 2012, Pages 93-105

  Duret, B ^a   Luret, G ^a   Reveillon, J ^a   Menard, T ^a   Berlemont, A ^a   Demoulin, F X ^a  

^a Unité Mixte de Recherche   (France)

Author keywords

DNS; Evaporation; Modeling; Passive scalar; Turbulent mixing; Two phase flows; Vaporization

Indexed keywords

COMBUSTION MODELING; DNS; ENERGY LEVEL; EVAPORATION AND MIXING PROCESS; EVAPORATION PROCESS; HOMOGENEOUS ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE; LIQUID VOLUME FRACTION; PASSIVE SCALARS; SCALAR FIELDS; SCALAR MIXING; SPECTRUM SHAPE; TURBULENT MIXING; TURBULENT TWO-PHASE FLOWS; VAPORIZATION RATE;

EVAPORATION; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; LIQUIDS; MIXING; MODELS; SHOCK TUBES; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TURBULENT FLOW; TWO PHASE FLOW; VAPORIZATION;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 84856098638     PISSN: 03019322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Borghi R. Turbulent combustion modeling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1988, 14:245-292.
2. Brackbill J.U., Kothe D.B., Zemach C. A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 100:335-354.
3. Calimez, X. 1998. Simulation á petite échelle par une méthode v.o.f. d'écoulements diphasiques réactifs. Ph.D. thesis. Ecole Centrale Paris, EM2C.
4. Chaisemartin S.D., Fréret L., Kah D., Laurent F., Fox R., Reveillon J., Massot M. Eulerian models for turbulent spray combustion with polydispersity and droplet crossing. Compt. Rend. Méc. 2009, 337:438-448. (Combustion for aerospace propulsion).
5. Danaila L., Antonia R.A. Spectrum of a passive scalar in moderate reynolds number homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21:111702.
6. Demoulin F.X., Borghi R. Modeling of turbulent spray combustion with application to diesel like experiment. Combust. Flame 2002, 129:281-293.
7. Desjardins O., Moureau V., Pitsch H. An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:8395-8416.
8. Enright D., Fedkiw R., Ferziger J., Mitchell I. A hybrid particle level set method for improved interface capturing. J. Comput. Phys. 2002, 183:83-116.
9. Eswaran V., Pope S. Examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence. Comput. Fluids 1988, 16:257-278.
10. Eswaran V., Pope S.B. Direct numerical simulations of the turbulent mixing of a passive scalar. Phys. Fluids 1988, 31:506-520.
11. Fedkiw R.P., Aslam T., Merriman B., Osher S. A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (the ghost fluid method). J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 152:457-492.
12. Gibou F., Chen L., Nguyen D., Banerjee S. A level set based sharp interface method for the multiphase incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with phase change. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 222:536-555.
13. Guichard C., Reveillon J., Haugel R. DNS of statistically stationary one-and two-phase turbulent combustion: a turbulent injection procedure. Turb. Flow Combust. 2004, 73:133-167.
14. Hirt C.W., Nichols B.D. Volume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 1981, 39:201-225.
15. Juric D., Tryggvason G. Computations of boiling flows. Int.J. Multiphase Flow 1998, 24:387-410.
16. Kang M., Fedkiw R.P., Liu X. Boundary conditions capturing method for multiphase incompressible flow. J. Sci. Comput. 2000, 3:323-360.
17. Lebas R., Menard T., Beau P., Berlemont A., Demoulin F. Numerical simulation of primary break-up and atomization: DNS and modelling study. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2009, 35:247-260.
18. Libby P., Williams F. Turbulent Reacting Flows 1994, Academic Press, London.
19. Liu X.-D., Fedkiw R.P., Kang M. A boundary condition capturing method for poisson's equation on irregular domains. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 160:151-178.
20. Luret, G., Blokkeel, G., Lebas, R., Ménard, T., Berlemont, A., Demoulin, F. 2008. Spray interactions: modeling of collision/coalescence phenomena. In: 22nd European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Como Lake, Italy.
21. Luret G., Menard T., Blokkeel G., Berlemont A., Réveillon J., Demoulin F. Modeling collision outcome in moderately dense spray. J. Atomiz. Spray 2010, 20:93.
22. Ménard T., Tanguy S., Berlemont A. Coupling level set/vof/ghost fluid methods: validation and application to 3D simulation of the primary break-up of a liquid jet. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2007, 33:510-524.
23. Olsson E., Kreiss G. A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 210:225-246.
24. Osher S., Fedkiw R.P. Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. J. Comput. Phys. 2001, 169:463-502.
25. Reveillon J., Demoulin F.-X. Effects of the preferential segregation of droplets on evaporation and turbulent mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 2007, 583:273-302.
26. Reveillon J., Vervisch L. Spray vaporization in nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling: a single droplet model. Combust. Flame 2000, 121:75-90.
27. Reveillon J., Vervisch L. Analysis of weakly turbulent dilute-spray flames and spray combustion regimes. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 537:317-347.
28. Rosales C., Meneveau C. Linear forcing in numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence: physical space implementations and convergence properties. Phys. Fluids 2005, 17:095106.
29. Schlottke J., Weigand B. Direct numerical simulation of evaporating droplets. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:5215-5237.
30. Sethian J.A. A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93:1591.
31. Shinjo J., Umemura A. Simulation of liquid jet primary breakup: dynamics of ligament and droplet formation. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2010, 36:513-532.
32. Shu, C.-W., November 1997. Essentially Non-Oscillatory and Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. Tech. Rep. NASA CR-97-206253 ICASE Report No. 97-65. Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering.
33. Strotos G., Gavaises M., Theodorakakos A., Bergeles G. Numerical investigation on the evaporation of droplets depositing on heated surfaces at low weber numbers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2008, 51:1516-1529.
34. Sussman M., Puckett E.G. A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 162:301-337.
35. Sussman M., Smereka P., Osher S. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 114:146-159.
36. Sussman M., Fatemi E., Smereka P., Osher S. An improved level set method for incompressible two-phase flows. Comput. Fluids 1998, 27:663-680.
37. Tanguy S., Berlemont A. Application of a level set method for simulation of droplet collisions. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2005, 31:1015-1035.
38. Tanguy S., Ménard T., Berlemont A. A level set method for vaporizing two-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 221:837-853.
39. Tomar G., Biswas G., Sharma A., Agrawal A. Numerical simulation of bubble growth in film boiling using a coupled level-set and volume-of-fluid method. Phys. Fluids 2005, 17:112103.
40. Tryggvason G., Esmaeeli A., Al-Rawahi N. Direct numerical simulations of flows with phase change. Comput. Struct. 2005, 83:445-453. (Frontier of multi-phase flow analysis and fluid-structure).
41. Tryggvason G., Thomas S., Lu J., Aboulhasanzadeh B. Multiscale issues in DNS of multiphase flows. Acta Math. Scientia 2010, 30:551-562.
42. Unverdi S.O., Tryggvason G. Computations of multi-fluid flows. Physica D: Nonlin. Phenom. 1992, 60:70-83.
43. Welch S.W.J. Local simulation of two-phase flows including interface tracking with mass transfer. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 121:142-154.