Priming and retouch in flash-lag and other phenomena of the streaming perceptual input

Space and Time in Perception and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 536-558

  Bachmann, Talis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856095430     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.030     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2003). The –flash-lag— effect occurs in audition and cross-modally. Curr Biol 13: 59-63.
2. Arrighi, R., Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2005). Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual fash-lag effect. Vision Res 45: 2917-2925.
3. Baars, B. (1995). Surprisingly small subcortical structures are needed for the state of waking consciousness, while cortical projection areas seem to provide perceptual contents of consciousness. Conscious Cogn 4: 159-162.
4. Baars, B. J. (1997). In the Theater of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bachmann, T. (1984). The process of perceptual retouch: nonspecifc afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking. Percept Psychophys 35: 69-84.
6. Bachmann, T. (1989). Microgenesis as traced by the transient paired-forms paradigm. Acta Psychologica 70: 3-17.
7. Bachmann, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of Visual Masking: The Fine Structure of Conscious Experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
8. Bachmann, T. (1997). Visibility of brief images: The dual-process approach. Conscious Cogn 6: 491-518.
9. Bachmann, T. (1999). Twelve spatiotemporal phenomena, and one explanation. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. M¨usseler (eds.), Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events. (173-206). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Bachmann, T. (2000). Microgenetic Approach to the Conscious Mind. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11. Bachmann, T., Luiga, I., Põder, E., & Kalev, K. (2003). Perceptual acceleration of objects in stream: evidence from fash-lag displays. Conscious Cogn 12: 279-297.
12. Bachmann, T., & Oja, A. (2003). Flash-lag without change in feature space is alive and well at late intervals after stream onset. Perception 32(Suppl.): 126-127.
13. Bachmann, T., & Põder, E. (2001). Change in feature space is not necessary for the fash-lag effect. Vision Res 41: 1103-1106.
14. Bachmann, T., Põder, E., & Luiga, I. (2004). Illusory reversal of temporal order: the bias to report a dimmer stimulus as the frst. Vision Res 44: 241-246.
15. Bachmann, T., & Sikka, P. (2005). Perception of successive targets presented in invariant-item streams. Acta Psychologica 120: 19-34.
16. Baldo, M. V. C., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shiftf Nature 378: 565-566.
17. Baldo, M. V. C., Kihara, A. H., Namba, J., & Klein, S. A. (2002). Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and fashing stimuli. Perception 31: 17-30.
18. Bogen, J. E. (1995). On the neurophysiology of consciousness: I. An overview. Conscious Cogn 4: 52-62.
19. Bonneh, Y., Cooperman, A., & Sagi, D. (2001). Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature 411: 798-801.
20. Börgers, C., Epstein, S., & Kopell, N. J. (2005). Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: a computational study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 7002-7007.
21. Bregman, A. S., & Rudnicky, A. J. (1975). Auditory segregation: stream or streamsf J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 104: 263-267.
22. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Öfgmen, H. (2006). Visual Masking: Time Slices Through Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2000). Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the fash-lag effect. Vision Res 40: 1645-1648.
24. Brooks, B., & Jung, R. (1973). Neuronal physiology of the visual cortex. In R. Jung (ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. VII/.3 (325-440). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25. Cai, R.,&Schlag, J. (2001). A new form of illusory conjunction between color and shape [Abstract]. J Vis1: 127a.
26. Carretie, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Mercado, F., & Tapia, M. (2005). Cortical response to subjectively unconscious danger. NeuroImage 24: 615-623.
27. Crick, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81: 4586-4590.
28. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1998). Constraints on cortical and thalamic projections: the no-strong-loops hypothesis. Nature 391: 245-250.
29. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (2003). A framework for consciousness. Nat Neurosci 6: 119-126.
30. DiLollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 129: 481-507.
31. Eagleman, D. M. (2010). How does the timing of neural signals map onto the timing of perception. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (eds.), Space and Time in Perception and Action (216-231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036-2038.
33. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Percep Psychophys 12: 201-204.
34. Herrmann, C. S., & Mecklinger, A. (2001). Gamma activity in human EEG is related to high-speed memory comparisons during object selective attention. Vis Cogn 8: 593-608.
35. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36: 791-804.
36. Hommuk, K., Bachmann, T., & Oja, A. (2008). Precuing an isolated stimulus temporarily outweighs in-stream stimulus facilitation. J Gen Psychol 135: 167-181.
37. Jáskowski, P., van der Lubbe, R., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identifed. Psychol Sci 13: 48-54.
38. John, E. R. (2005). From synchronous neuronal discharges to subjective awareness. In S. Laureys (ed.), Progress in Brain Research. 150: 143-171.
39. Kanwisher, N. (2001). Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition 79: 89-113.
40. Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (2004). Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight. Neuropsychologia 42: 831-835.
41. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shiftf Nature 378: 566.
42. Khurana, B., Watanabe, K., & Nijhawan, R. (2000). The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects –corrected— of fashed objects attentionally delayedf Perception 29: 675-692.
43. Kirschfeld, K. (2006). Stopping motion and the fash-lag effect. Vision Res 46: 1547-1551.
44. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 16-22.
45. Kreegipuu, K., & Allik, J. (2003). Perceived onset time and position of a moving stimulus. Vision Res 43: 1625-1635.
46. Krekelberg, B. (2001). The persistence of position. Vision Res 41: 529-539.
47. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (1999). Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Res 39: 2669-2679.
48. LaBerge, D. (1997). Attention, awareness, and the triangular circuit. Conscious Cogn 6: 149-181.
49. Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 12-18.
50. Lamme, V. A. F. (2004). Separate neural defnitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Netw 17: 861-872.
51. Libet, B. (2004). Mind Time. The Temporal Factor in Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Llinás, R., Leznik, E., & Urbano, F. J. (2002). Temporal binding via cortical coincidence detection of specifc and nonspecifc thalamocortical inputs: a voltage-dependent dye-imaging study in mouse brain slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 449-454.
53. Llinás, R., & Ribary, U. (2001). Consciousness and the brain. The thalamocortical dialogue in health and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 929: 166-175.
54. Llinás, R., Ribary, U., Contreras, D., & Pedroarena, C. (1998). The neuronal basis for consciousness. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1841-1849.
55. Llinás, R., Urbano, F. J., Leznik, E., Ramirez, R. R., & van Merle, H. J. F. (2005). Rhythmic and dysrhythmic thalamocortical dynamics: GABA systems and the edge effect. Trends Neurosci 28: 325-333.
56. Magoun, H. W. (1958). The Waking Brain. Springfeld, IL: C. C. Thomas.
57. McDonald, J. J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., Di Russo, F., & Hillyard, S. A. (2005). Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception. Nat Neurosci 8: 1197-1202.
58. Melcher, D., Papathomas, T. V., & Vidnyansky, Z. (2005). Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features. Neuron 46: 723-729.
59. Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2004). Last but not least: seeing the disappearance of unseen objects. Perception 33: 1267-1273.
60. Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). Forming and updating object representations without awareness: evidence from motion-induced blindness. Vision Res 45: 961-967.
61. Montaser-Kouhsari, L., & Rajimehr, R. (2005). Subliminal attentional modulation in crowding condition. Vision Res 45: 839-844.
62. Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Object updating and the fash-lag effect. Psychol Sci 15: 866-871.
63. Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997). Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive system. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264: 1407-1414.
64. Murakami, I. (2001). A fash-lag effect in random motion. Vision Res 41: 3101-3119.
65. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychol Sci 13: 416-424.
66. Neumann, O. (1982). Experimente zum Fehrer-Raab-Effekt und das Wetterwart-Modell der visuellen Maskierung. Report No. 24/1982, Psychological Institute, Ruhr-University Bochum.
67. Newman, J. (1995). Thalamic contributions to attention and consciousness. Conscious Cogn 4: 172-193.
68. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256-257.
69. Nijhawan, R. (2001). The fash-lag phenomenon: object motion and eye movements. Perception 30: 263-282.
70. Nijhawan, R., & Khurana, B. (2000). Conscious registration of continuous and discrete visual events. In T. Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. (203-219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Öfgmen, H., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Camuz, K. (2004). Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process of moving targets, assessed with the fash-lag effect. Vision Res 44: 2109-2128.
72. Purpura, D. (1970). Operations and processes in thalamic and synaptically related neural subsystems. In F. O. Schmitt (ed.), The Neurosciences. Second Study Program (458-470). New York: Rockefeller University Press.
73. Rees, G., Kreiman, G., & Koch, C. (2002). Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 261-270.
74. Reichardt, W. (1961). Autocorrelation: a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In W. A. Rosenblith (ed.), Principles of Sensory Communication. New York: Wiley.
75. Ribary, U. (2005). Dynamics of thalamo-cortical network oscillations and human perception. In S. Laureys (ed.), Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 150 (127-142).
76. Rose, D. (2006). Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Salminen, N., Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2005). Independence of visual awareness from attention at early processing stages. Paper presented at ASSC9, June 24-27, Pasadena, CA.
78. Scharlau, I. (2004a). Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked prime. Psychol Res 68: 224-236.
79. Scharlau, I. (2004b). The spatial distribution of attention in perceptual latency priming. Q J Exp Psychol 57: 1411-1436.
80. Scharlau, I. (2007). Temporal processes in prime-mask interaction. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 3: 241-255.
81. Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Intention-mediated control of attention by nonconscious information (paper presented at ASSC8).
82. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003a). Temporal parameters and time course of perceptual latency priming. Acta Psychologica 113: 185-203.
83. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003b). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: evidence for an attentional interpretation. Psychol Res 67: 184-196.
84. Scheibel, A. (1980). Anatomical and physiological substrates of arousal: a view from the bridge. In J. A. Hobson & M. A. B. Brazier (eds.), The Reticular Formation Revisited: Specifying Function for a Nonspecifc System (55-66). New York: Raven.
85. Schurger, A., Cowey, A., Cohen, J., Treisman, A., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2008). Distinct and independent correlates of awareness and attention in a hemianopic patient. Neuropsychologia 46: 2189-2197.
86. Sherman, S. M., & Guillery, R. W. (1998). On the actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing –drivers— from –modulators.— Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 7121-7126.
87. Sheth, B. R., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Changing objects lead briefy fashed ones. Nat Neurosci 3: 489-495.
88. Shore, D. J., Spence, C., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Visual prior entry. Psychol Sci 12: 205-212.
89. Singer, W. (1998). Consciousness and the structure of neuronal representations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1829-1840.
90. Steriade, M. (1996). Awakening the brain. Nature 383: 24-25.
91. Steriade, M. (2000). Corticothalamic resonance, states of vigilance and mentation. Neurosci 101: 243-276.
92. Steriade, M., Jones, E. G., & Llinás, R. R. (1990). Thalamic Oscillations and Signalling. New York: Wiley.
93. Steriade, M., Jones, E. G., & McCormick, D. A. (1997). Thalamus. Oxford: Elsevier.
94. Steriade, M., & McCarley, R. W. (2005). Brain Control of Wakefulness and Sleep. New York: Springer/Kluwer/Plenum.
95. Stone, A., & Valentine, T. (2005). Orientation of attention to nonconsciously recognised famous faces. Cogn Emot 19: 537-558. Summerfeld, C., Jack, A. I., & Burgess, A. P. (2002). Induced gamma activity is associated with conscious awareness of pattern masked nouns. Int J Psychophysiol 44: 93-100.
96. Taylor, K., Mandon, S., Freiwald, W. A., & Kreiter, A. K. (2005). Coherent oscillatory activity in monkey area V4 predicts successful allocation of attention. Cerebral Cortex 15: 1424-1437.
97. Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1295-1306.
98. VanRullen, R., Reddy, L., & Koch, C. (2010). A motion illusion reveals the temporally discrete nature of visual awareness. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (eds.), Space and Time in Perception and Action (521-535). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Vibell, J., Klinge, C., Zampini, M., Spence, C., & Nobre, A. C. (2007). Temporal order is coded temporally in the brain: early event-related potential latency shifts underlying prior entry in a cross-modal TOJ task. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 109-120.
100. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat Neurosci 1: 656-657.
101. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a fash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and fashed stimuli. Vision Res 40: 137-149.
102. Wright, R. D., & Richard, D. M. (2003). Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays. Percept Psychophys 65: 925-938.
103. Wyart, V., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2008). Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention. J Neurosci 28: 2667-2679.
104. Zampini, M., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C. (2005). Audiovisual prior entry. Neurosci Lett 381: 217-222.