The configuration and application of helical membrane modules in MBR

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 392-393, Issue , 2012, Pages 112-121

  Jie, Liang ^a   Liu, Lifen ^a   Yang, Fenglin ^a   Liu, Fengxia ^a   Liu, Zhijun ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Average flux; Fouling reduction; Helical membrane; Optimization; Turbulence enhancement

Indexed keywords

AERATION INTENSITY; AVERAGE FLUX; FLAT MEMBRANE; FLAT MODULE; FLAT SHEET MEMBRANES; FLOW DYNAMICS; FLUX ENHANCEMENT; FOULING REDUCTION; HELICAL BAFFLES; HELICAL MEMBRANE; HELICAL MODULE; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE MODULE; MEMBRANE SPACING; MEMBRANE SURFACE; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY TECHNIQUE; PERMEATE FLUX; SHEARING RATES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

BIOREACTORS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FLOCCULATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; OPTIMIZATION; TURBULENCE; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

FILTRATION;

AERATION; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; FLOW RATE; HELICAL MEMBRANE MODULE; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PARAMETERS; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLUDGE TREATMENT;

EID: 84856083447     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Broussous L., Schmitz P. Hydrodynamic aspects of filtration antifouling by helically corrugated membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55:5049-5057.
2. Ghaffour N., Jassimb R., Khir T. Flux enhancement by using helical baffles in ultrafiltration of suspended solids. Desalination 2004, 167:201-207.
3. Gupta B.B., Howell J.A., Wu D., Field R.W. A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 99:31-42.
4. Bayer C., Breisig H., Follmann M., Fritzmann C., Melin T. Mixing in spacer filled channels. J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2009, 10:35-40.
5. Chung K.Y., Lee M.S. Flux enhancement in a helical microfiltration module with gas injection. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40:2479-2495.
6. Scott K., Lobato J. Mass transfer characteristics of cross-corrugated membranes. Desalination 2002, 146:255-258.
7. Broussous L., Prouzet E., Beque L., Larbot A. An experimental study of helically stamped ceramic microfiltration membranes using bentonite suspensions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 24:205-221.
8. Hashino M., Katagiri T., Kubota N. Effect of surface roughness of hollow fiber membranes with gear-shaped structure on membrane fouling by sodium alginate. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366:389-397.
9. Jonsson A.S. Influence of shear rate on the flux during ultrafiltration of colloidal substances. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 79:93-99.
10. Maranges C., Fonade C. Flux enhancement in crossflow filtration using an unsteady jet. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 123:1-8.
11. Costigan G., Bellhouse B.J., Picard C. Flux enhancement in microfiltration by corkscrew vortices formed in helical flow passages. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 206:179-188.
12. Bertram C.D., Hoogland M.R., Li H., Odell R.A. Flux enhancement in cross-flow microfiltration using a collapsible-tube pulsation generator. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 84:279-292.
13. Cheng T.W., Li L.N. Gas-sparging cross-flow ultrafiltration in flat-plate membrane module: effects of channel height and membrane inclination. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55:50-55.
14. Ahmad A.L., Mariadas A. Baffled microfiltration membrane and its fouling control for feed water of desalination. Desalination 2004, 168:223-230.
15. Scott K., Mahmood A.J., Jachuck R.J., Hu B. Intensified membrane filtration with corrugated membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 173:1-16.
16. Li B., Ye M.S., Yang F.L., Ma H. Mathematical model analysis on the enhancement of aeration efficiency using ladder-type flat membrane module forms in the submerged membrane bio-reactor (SMBR). Sci. China Ser. E 2009, 52(5):1363-1373.
17. Liu L.F., Xu X.J., Zhao C.Q., Yang F.L. A new helical membrane module for increasing permeate flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360:142-148.
18. Cowen E.A., Monismith S.G. A hybrid digital particle tracking velocimetry technique. Exp. Fluids 1997, 22:199-211.
19. Meselhe E.A., Peeva T., Muste M. Large scale particle image velocimetry for low velocity and shallow water flows. J. Hydrol. Energy 2004, 130:937-940.
20. Chang S., Fane A.G. The effect of fibre diameter on filtration and flux distribution-relevance to submerged hollow fibre modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 184:221-231.
21. Chang S., Fane A.G. Filtration of biomass with axial inter-fibre upward slug flow: performance and mechanism. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 180:57-68.
22. Chan C.C.V., Erube P.R.B., Hall E.R. Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 297:104-120.
23. Dizge N., Soydemir G., Karagunduz A. Influence of type and pore size of membranes on cross flow microfiltration of biological suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366:278-285.
24. Hwang K.-J., Hsu Y.-L., Tung K.-L. Effect of particle size on the performance of cross-flow microfiltration. Adv. Powder Technol. 2006, 17:189-206.
25. Ji J., Qiu J.P, Wong F.-S., Li Y.Z. Enhancement of filterability in MBR achieved by improvement of supernatant and floc characteristics via filter aids addition. Water Res. 2008, 42:3611-3622.
26. Tsui Y., Hu Y. Flow characterization in mixers agitated by helical ribbon blade impeller. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2011, 5:416-429.