The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 262-269

  Achtnicht, Martin ^a   Bühler, Georg ^a   Hermeling, Claudia ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alternative automobile fuels; Alternative fuel infrastructure; Bio fueled cars; German car market

Indexed keywords

AVAILABILITY; CRASHWORTHINESS; FUELS; SURVEYS; VEHICLES;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES; CAR MARKETS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; COMPUTER ASSISTED; FUEL TYPES; LOGIT MODELING; MARGINAL UTILITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ALTERNATIVE FUELS;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; AUTOMOBILE; BIOFUEL; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DEMAND ANALYSIS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MARKET SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84856075708     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. 2 emissions. Climatic Change 2011, 10.1007/s10584-011-0362-8.
2. Bolduc D., Boucher N., Alvarez-Daziano R. Hybrid choice modeling of new technologies for car choice in Canada. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2082:63-71.
3. Bunch D., Bradley M., Golob T., Kitamura K. Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: a discrete-choice stated preferences pilot study. Transportation Research Part A 1993, 27:237-253.
4. European Union, 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, Strasbourg.
5. European Union, 2011. White Paper: roadmap to a single European transport area - towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, Brussels.
6. Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review 1986, 76:940-955.
7. German Federal Government, 2009. Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität der Bundesregierung, Berlin.
8. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Hensher D.A., Beck M.J., Rose J.M. Accounting for preference and scale heterogeneity in establishing whether it matters who is interviewed to reveal household automobile purchase preferences. Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 49:1-22.
10. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, 2009. Fachartikel: Halter der Fahrzeuge, 2 November, Flensburg.
11. Mobilität in Deutschland, 2010. Mobilität in Deutschland 2008. Tabellenband, Bonn and Berlin.
12. Moore W.L., Holbrook M.B. Conjoint analysis on objects with environmentally correlated attributes: the questionable importance of representative design. Journal of Consumer Research 1990, 16:490-497.
13. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.