Comparative diagnostic analysis of runoff generation processes in Oklahoma DMIP2 basins: The Blue River and the Illinois River

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 418-419, Issue , 2012, Pages 90-109

  Li, Hongyi ^a   Sivapalan, Murugesu ^a,b,d   Tian, Fuqiang ^b,c  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Comparative hydrology; Diagnostics; Runoff generation; Signatures; Spatio temperal pattern

Indexed keywords

BLUE RIVER; CLIMATE FORCINGS; DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS; DRY SEASONS; HIGH-TO-LOW; ILLINOIS RIVER; ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN; INFILTRATION EXCESS; MODEL PREDICTION; MODEL RESULTS; OBSERVED DATA; OKLAHOMA; PERMEABLE SOILS; PHYSICALLY BASED; RAINFALL RUNOFF; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS; RUNOFF GENERATION; SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; SATURATION EXCESS; SEASONALITY; SIGNATURES; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL SCALING; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; SPATIO-TEMPERAL PATTERN; SPATIO-TEMPORAL; SUBSURFACE STORMFLOW; SURFACE RUNOFF GENERATION; SURFACE SOIL MOISTURE; TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE; WATER TABLE DEPTHS; WATER TABLES; WET SEASON;

FORECASTING; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PLASMA DIAGNOSTICS; RAIN; RIVERS; SEEPAGE; SOIL MOISTURE; WATERSHEDS;

RUNOFF;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RUNOFF; SATURATION; SEASONALITY; SLOPE; SOIL MOISTURE; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STORM; TOPOGRAPHY; WATER DEPTH; WATERSHED;

BLUE RIVER [OKLAHOMA]; ILLINOIS BASIN; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856042598     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnold J.G., Potter K.N., King K.W., Allen P.M. Estimation of soil cracking and the effect on surface runoff in a Texas Blackland Prairie watershed. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19:589-603.
2. Atkinson S.E., Woods R.A., Sivapalan M. Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales. Water Resour. Res. 2003, (12):1314. 10.1029/2002WR001487.
3. Breuer L., Huisman J.A., Willems P., Bormann H., Bronstert A., Croke B.F.W., Frede H-G., Gräff T., Hubrechts L., Jakeman A.J., Kite G., Lanini J., Leavesley G., Lettenmaier D.P., Lindström G., Seibert J., Sivapalan M., Viney N.R. Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM). I: model intercomparison of current land use. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(2):129-146. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.003.
4. De Aráujo J.C., Piedra J.I.C. Comparative hydrology: analysis of a semiarid and a humid tropical watershed. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23:1169-1178. 10.1002/hyp.7232.
5. Deguchi A., Hattori S., Park H.T. The influence of seasonal changes in canopy structure on interception loss: application of the revised Gash model. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318:80-102.
6. Dunne T. Field Studies of Hillslope Flow Processes 1978, John Wiley, pp. 227-293.
7. Eidenshink J.C., Faundeen J.L. The 1-km AVHRR global land data set: first stages in implementation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1994, 15:3443-3462.
8. Fabian, R., 2008. Hydrologic Investigation of The Blue River (Stream System 1-6), Technical Report 2008-01 for Oklahoma Water Resources Board, p. 24.
9. Falkenmark, M., Chapman, T., 1989. Comparative Hydrology-An Ecological Approach to Land and Water Resources. UNESCO, Paris, p. 479.
10. Farmer D.L., Sivapalan M., Jothityangkoon C. Climate, soil and vegetation controls upon the variability in temperate and semi-arid landscapes: downward approach to hydrological analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2003, (2):1035. 10.1029/2001WR000328.
11. Horton, R.E., 1935. Surface Runoff Phenomena. Part I. Analysis of the Hydrograph. Horton Hydrological Laboratory Publication 101, Vorheesville, New York.
12. Ivanov V.Y., Vivoni E.R., Bras R.L., Entekhabi D. Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: a fully-distributed, physically-based approach. J. Hydrol. 2004, 298:80-111.
13. Kling H., Nachtnebel H.P. A spatio-temporal comparison of water balance modelling in an Alpine catchment. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23:997-1009. 10.1002/hyp.7207.
14. Lana-Renault N., Latron J., Regues D. Streamflow response and water-table dynamics in a sub-Mediterranean research catchment (Central Pyrenees). J. Hydrol. 2007, 347:497-507.
15. Lee H., Zehe E., Sivapalan M. Predictions of rainfall-runoff response and soil moisture dynamics in a microscale catchment using the CREW model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11:819-849.
16. Merz R., Blöschl G., Parajka J. Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients. J. Hydrol. 2006, 331:591-604.
17. Mou L., Tian F., Hu H., Sivapalan M. Extension of the representative elementary watershed approach for cold regions: constitutive relationships and an application. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2008, 12:565-585.
18. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 2003. The Arbuckle-Simpson Hydrology Study: Management and Protection of an Oklahoma Water Resource. http://www.owrb.ok.gov/studies/groundwater/arbuckle_simpson/arbuckle_study.php.
19. Oudin L., Andréassian V., Lerat J., Michel C. Has land cover a significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment using 1508 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2008, 357:303-316.
20. Peters J.C., Easton D.J. Runoff simulation using radar rainfall data. Water Resour. Bull. 1996, 32(4):753-760.
21. Reggiani P., Sivapalan M., Hassanizadeh S.M. A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics. Adv. Water Resour. 1998, 22:367-398.
22. Reggiani P., Hassanizadeh S.M., Sivapalan M. A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: constitutive relationships. Adv. Water Resour. 1999, 23:15-39.
23. Reggiani P., Sivapalan M., Hassanizadeh S.M. Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: exploring the physical basis of water balance. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36:1845-1863. 10.1029/2000WR900066.
24. Rupp D.E., Selker J.S. Information, artifacts, and noise in dQ/dt-Q recession analysis. Adv. Water Resour. 2006, 29(2):154-160.
25. Samuel J.M., Sivapalan M., Struthers I. Diagnostic analysis of water balance variability: a comparative modeling study of catchments in Perth, Newcastle, and Darwin, Australia. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W06403. 10.1029/2007WR006694.
26. Sherman L. Streamflow from rainfall by unit hydrograph method. Eng. News Rec. 1932, 108:501-505. (Chicago).
27. Sivapalan M., Takeuchi K., Franks S.W., Gupta V.K., Karambiri H., Lakshmi V., Liang X., McDonnell J.J., Mendiondo E.M., O'Connell P.E., Oki T., Pomeroy J.W., Schertzer D., Uhlenbrook S., Zehe E. IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2003, 48(6):857-880.
28. Smith M.B., Seo D.J., Koren V.I., Reed S.M., Zhang Z., Duan Q., Moreda F., Cong S. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. J. Hydrol. 2004, 298:4-26.
29. Smith, M.B., Koren, V.I., Reed, S.M., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Moreda, F., Cui, Z., Mizukami, N., Sheldon, S., in press. The distributed model intercomparison project: phase 2, motivation and experiment design. J. Hydrol., doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.040.
30. Tian, F., 2006. Study on Thermodynamic Watershed Hydrological Model (THModel). Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, p. 168.
31. Tian F., Hu H., Lei Z., Sivapalan M. Extension of the representative elementary watershed approach for cold regions via explicit treatment of energy related processes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 10:619-644.
32. Tian F., Hu H., Lei Z. Thermodynamic watershed hydrological model: constitutive relationship. Sci. China, Ser. E 2007, 51(9):1315-1562.
33. Tian, F., Li, H., Sivapalan, M., in press. Model Diagnostic Analysis of Seasonal Switching of Runoff Generation Mechanisms in the Blue River basin, Oklahoma. J. Hydrol., doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.011.
34. Van Dijk A.I.J.M., Bruijnzeel L.A. Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 1. Model description. J. Hydrol. 2001, 247:230-238.
35. van Werkhoven K., Wagener T., Reed P., Tang Y. Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W01429. 10.1029/2007WR006271.
36. Vivoni E.R., Entekhabi D., Bras R.L., Ivanov V.Y. Controls on runoff generation and scale-dependence in a distributed hydrologic model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11(5):1683-1701.
37. Vogel R.M., Sankarasubramanian A. Validation of a watershed model without calibration. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39(10):1292. 10.1029/2002WR001940.
38. Wagener T., Sivapalan M., Troch P.A., Woods R.A. Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity. Geography Compass 2007, 1(4):901-931. 10D1111/j.1749D8198D2007D00039.
39. Yang, D., Sun, F., Liu, Z., Cong, Z., Ni, G., Lei, Z., 2007. Analyzing spatial and temporal variability of annual water-energy balance in non-humid regions of China using the Budyko hypothesis. Water Resour. Res., 43, W04426. doi:101029/2006WR005224.
40. Yokoo Y., Sivapalan M., Oki T. Investigating the roles of climate seasonality and landscape characteristics on mean annual and monthly water balances. J. Hydrol. 2008, 357:255-269.