Endografts with suprarenal fixation do not perform better than those with infrarenal fixation in the treatment of patients with short straight proximal aortic necks

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1242-1246

  Hager, Eric S ^a   Cho, Jae S ^a   Makaroun, Michel S ^a   Park, Sun Cheol ^b   Chaer, Rabih ^a   Marone, Luke ^a   Rhee, Robert Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WARFARIN;

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; DEVICE MIGRATION; DRUG USE; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FOREIGN BODY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIFE TABLE; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; STENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY MIGRATION; HUMANS; LIFE TABLES; MALE; PENNSYLVANIA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856041739     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: 10976809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.088     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Parodi, J.C., Palmaz, J.C., Barone, H.D., Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 5 (1991), 491–499.
2. Anderson, P.L., Arons, R.R., Moskowitz, A.J., Gelijns, A., Magnell, C., Faries, P.L., et al. A statewide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: rapid diffusion with excellent early results. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004), 10–19.
3. Cox, D.E., Jacobs, D.L., Motaganahalli, R.L., Wittgen, C.M., Peterson, G.J., Outcomes of endovascular AAA repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy using adjunctive balloon-expandable stents. Vasc Endovascular Surg 40 (2006), 35–40.
4. Carpenter, J.P., Baum, R.A., Barker, C.F., Golden, M.A., Mitchell, M.E., Velazquez, O.C., et al. Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 34 (2001), 1050–1054.
5. Gitlitz, D.B., Ramaswami, G., Kaplan, D., Hollier, L.H., Marin, M.L., Endovascular stent grafting in the presence of aortic neck filling defects: early clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 33 (2001), 340–344.
6. Greenberg, R., Fairman, R., Srivastava, S., Criado, F., Green, R., Endovascular grafting in patients with short proximal necks: an analysis of short-term results. Cardiovasc Surg 8 (2000), 350–354.
7. Dillavou, E.D., Muluk, S.C., Rhee, R.Y., Tzeng, E., Woody, J.D., Gupta, N., et al. Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?. J Vasc Surg 38 (2003), 657–663.
8. Aburahma, A.F., Campbell, J.E., Mousa, A.Y., Hass, S.M., Stone, P.A., Jain, A., et al. Clinical outcomes for hostile versus favorable aortic neck anatomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using modular devices. J Vasc Surg 54 (2011), 13–21.
9. AbuRahma, A.F., Campbell, J., Stone, P.A., Nanjundappa, A., Jain, A., Dean, L.S., et al. The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients. J Vasc Surg 50 (2009), 738–748.
10. Schanzer, A., Greenberg, R.K., Hevelone, N., Robinson, W.P., Eslami, M.H., Goldberg, R.J., et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 123 (2011), 2848–2855.
11. Greenberg, R.K., Chuter, T.A., Cambria, R.P., Sternbergh, W.C. 3rd, Fearnot, N.E., Zenith abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular graft. J Vasc Surg 48 (2008), 1–9.
12. Greenhalgh, R.M., Brown, L.C., Powell, J.T., Thompson, S.G., Epstein, D., et al., United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 1863–1871.
13. Alterman, D.M., Stevens, S.L., The excluder aortic endograft. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 20 (2008), 136–148 discussion 149-57.
14. De Bruin, J.L., Baas, A.F., Buth, J., Prinssen, M., Verhoeven, E.L., Cuypers, P.W., et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 1881–1889.
15. Abbruzzese, T.A., Kwolek, C.J., Brewster, D.C., Chung, T.K., Kang, J., Conrad, M.F., et al. Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis. J Vasc Surg 48 (2008), 19–28.
16. Greenberg, R.K., Clair, D., Srivastava, S., Bhandari, G., Turc, A., Hampton, J., et al. Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair?. J Vasc Surg 38 (2003), 990–996.
17. Leurs, L.J., Kievit, J., Dagnelie, P.C., Nelemans, P.J., Buth, J., EUROSTAR Collaborators. Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 13 (2006), 640–648.
18. Stanley, B.M., Semmens, J.B., Mai, Q., Goodman, M.A., Hartley, D.E., Wilkinson, C., et al. Evaluation of patient selection guidelines for endoluminal AAA repair with the Zenith stent-graft: the Australasian experience. J Endovasc Ther 8 (2001), 457–464.