Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective

Energy Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 358-364

  Hamit Haggar, Mahamat ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian industrial sector; Cross section dependence; Economic growth; Energy consumption; Granger causality; Greenhouse gas emissions

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CANADIAN INDUSTRIAL SECTORS; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; CROSS SECTION DEPENDENCE; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; GRANGER CAUSALITY; NON-LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; PANEL COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS;

GAS EMISSIONS;

CARBON EMISSION; COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; GREENHOUSE GAS; KUZNETS CURVE; PANEL DATA;

CANADA;

EID: 84856032480     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. 2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 2010, 35:5412-5420.
2. Akbostanci E., Turut-Asik S., Tunc G.I. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?. Energy Policy 2009, 37:861-867.
3. Andrews D.W.K. Cross-section regression with common shocks. Econometrica 2005, 73:1551-1585.
4. Ang J.B. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4772-4778.
5. 2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3282-3286.
6. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States. Energy Economics 2009, 31:641-647.
7. Apergis N., Payne J.E. The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy 2010, 38:650-655.
8. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Coal consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1353-1359.
9. Bai J., Ng S. Panel unit root tests with cross-section dependence: a further investigation. Econometric Theory 2010, 26:1088-1114.
10. Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics 2000, 15:161-177.
11. Carrion-i-Silvestre J.L., Del Barrio-Castro T., Lópes-Bazo E. Breaking the panels: an application to the GDP per capita. Econometrics Journal 2005, 8:159-175.
12. Chandran V.G.R., Sharma S., Madhavan K. Electricity consumption-growth nexus: the case of Malaysia. Energy Policy 2010, 38:606-612.
13. Choi I. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 2001, 20:249-272.
14. Coondoo D., Dinda S. Causality between income and emissions: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecological Economics 2002, 40:351-367.
15. Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics 2004, 49:431-455.
16. Dinda S., Coondoo D. Income and emission: a panel-data based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics 2006, 57:167-181.
17. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
18. Frees E.W. Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. Journal of Econometrics 1995, 69:393-414.
19. Ghali K.H., El-Sakka M.I.T. Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 2004, 26:225-238.
20. Government of Canada Regulatory Framework for Air Emissions Available at. http://www.ec.gc.ca/doc/media/m_124/report_eng.pdf.
21. Hadri K. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometric Journal 2000, 3:148-161.
22. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1156-1164.
23. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. Estimation vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 1988, 56:1371-1395.
24. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 2003, 115:53-74.
25. Kuznets S. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 1955, 45:1-28.
26. Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P.C.B., Schmidt P., Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics 1992, 54:159-178.
27. 2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy 2010, 87:1858-1864.
28. Lee C.C. Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis. Energy Economics 2005, 27:415-427.
29. Lee C.C., Chang C.P. Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: a more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resource and Energy Economics 2008, 30:50-65.
30. 2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy 2009, 37:413-423.
31. Lee C.C., Chang C.P., Chen P.F. Energy-income causality in OECD countries revisited: the key role of capital stock. Energy Economics 2008, 30:2359-2373.
32. Levin A., Lin C.F., Chu C. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 108:1-24.
33. Maddala G.S., Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:631-652.
34. Menyah K., Wolde-Rufael Y. Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Economics 2010, 32:1374-1382.
35. O'Connell P. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics 1998, 44:1-19.
36. Ozturk I. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010, 38:340-349.
37. 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14:3220-3225.
38. Payne J.E. On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Applied Energy 2009, 86:575-577.
39. Payne J.E. Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship between energy consumption and growth. Journal of Economic Studies 2010, 37:53-95.
40. Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:653-670.
41. Pedroni P. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advanced in Econometrics 2000, 15:93-130.
42. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Econometric Theory 2004, 20:597-627.
43. Pesaran H.M. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 435, University of Cambridge, and CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229 2004.
44. Pesaran H.M. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with cross section dependence. Econometrica 2006, 74:967-1012.
45. Pesaran H.M. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2007, 22:265-312.
46. Pesaran H.M., Shin Y., Smith R.P. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999, 94:621-634.
47. Phillips P.C.B., Sul D. Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econometric Journal 2003, 6:217-259.
48. Soytas U., Sari R. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:1667-1675.
49. Soytas U., Sari R., Ewing B.T. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 2007, 62:482-489.
50. Westerlund J. New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econometrics Reviews 2005, 24:297-316.
51. Zhang X.P., Cheng X.M. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2706-2712.