Resiliency of transportation network of santo domingo, dominican republic: Case study

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2234, 2011, Pages 22-30

  Serulle, Nayel ^a   Heaslip, Kevin ^a   Brady, Brandon ^a   Louisell, William C ^b   Collura, John ^c  

^a Utah State University   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DISASTERS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FUZZY INFERENCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CASE-STUDIES; CONDITION; DECISION MAKERS; DISRUPTIVE EVENT; FUZZY INFERENCER; KEY VARIABLES; LEVEL OF SERVICE; NATURAL DISASTERS; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 84856023506     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2234-03     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Heaslip, K., W. Louisell, J. Collura, and N. Urena Serulle. A Sketch Level Method for Assessing Transportation Network Resiliency to Natural Disasters and Man-Made Events. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
2. Heaslip, K., W. Louisell, and J. Collura. A Methodology to Evaluate Transportation Resiliency for Regional Networks. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C., 2009.
3. Bruneau, M., S. Chang, R. Eguchi, G. Lee, T. O'Rourke, A. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. vonWinterfeldt. A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2003, pp. 733-752.
4. Murray-Tuite, P. A Comparison of Transportation Network Resilience Under Simulated System Optimum and User Equilibrium Conditions. Presented at Winter Simulation Conference, 2006.
5. Evaluation of System's Available Redundancy to Compensate for Loss of Transportation Assets Resulting from Natural Disaster or Terrorist Attacks. National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, Washington, D.C., 2007.
6. Litman, T. Evaluation of Accessibility for Transportation Planning. In TMD Encyclopedia, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2008. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/index.php.
7. Todini, E. Looped Water Distribution Networks Design Using a Resilience Index Based Heuristic Approach. Urban Water, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2000, pp. 115-122.
8. Hamad, K., and S. Kikuchi. Developing a Measure of Traffic Congestion: Fuzzy Inference Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1802, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 77-85.
9. Brenkert, A., and E. Malone. Modeling Vulnerability and Resilience to Climate Change: A Case Study of India and Indian States. Climatic Change, Vol. 72, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 57-102. (Pubitemid 41428081)
10. Briguglio, L., G. Cordina, S. Bugeja, and N. Farrugia. Conceptualizing and Measuring Economic Resilience. University of Malta, Msida, Malta, 2005.
11. Huiping, L., S. Fernandez, and A. Ganguly. Racial Geography, Economic Growth and Natural Disaster Resilience. Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., 2005.
12. Mayunga, J. Understanding and Applying the Concept of Community Disaster Resilience: A Capital-Based Approach. Presented at 2007 Summer Academy of the Munich Re Foundation, Munich, Germany, 2007. http://www.munichrefoundation.org/ StiftungsWebsite/Projects/SocialVulnerability/2007SummerAcademy/ SummerAcademy2007- documents.htm.
13. Asia Regional Task Force on Urban Risk Reduction. City Profile: Climate and Disaster Resilience. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 2008.
14. Hanss, M. Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic: An Introduction with Engineering Applications. Springer, New York, 2005.
15. Godschalk, D. R. Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Plenary paper presented at Urban Hazards Forum, John Jay College, City University of New York, Jan. 22-24, 2002. www.arch.columbia.edu/Studio/ Spring2003/UP/Accra/links/GodshalkResilientCities.doc. Accessed April 25, 2010.
16. Washburn, S. S., and D. S. Kirschner. Rural Freeway Level of Service Based on Traveler Perception. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1988, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 31-37. (Pubitemid 46325522)
17. Arterial Level-of-Service Defined. In Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
18. Transportation Service Index: Table 3. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010. http://www.bts.gov/press-releases/2010/bts002-10/html/ bts002-10.html#table-01. Accessed Feb. 4, 2010.
19. Central Intelligence Agency's Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency, May 2009. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/DR.html. Accessed Feb. 4, 2010.
20. The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale. National Hurricane Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Miami, Fla., 2009. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/sshws.shtml. Accessed Feb. 24, 2010.
21. Costo de Operacion de Autobuses en Santo Domingo. Autoridad Metro-politana de Transporte, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 2001.
22. Isa, J. Estudio de Movilidad y Factibilidad para la Avenida de Cir-cunvalación Norte de Santo Domingo. Isa Development Group, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 2010.
23. Banco Central de la Republica Dominicana (Central Bank of the Dominican Republic), April 2010. Accessed April 24, 2010. http://www. bancentral.gov.do/.
24. Ta, C., A. V. Goodchild, and K. Pitera. Structuring a Definition of Resilience for the Freight Transportation System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2097, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 19-25.