The '70% claim': What is the evidence base?

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 487-488

  Hallworth, Mike J ^a  

^a ROYAL SHREWSBURY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LABORATORY; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE; PATIENT CARE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84856020641     PISSN: 00045632     EISSN: 17581001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/acb.2011.011177     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Kilpatrick ES, Freedman DB, on behalf of the National Clinical Biochemistry Audit Group. A national survey of interpretative reporting in the UK. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:317-20
2. Beastall GH. Adding value to clinical biochemistry. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47(Suppl 1):1
3. Forsman RW. Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? Clin Chem 1996;42:813-6
4. Communicating the laboratory's value to health care: an interview with Rodney Forsman. Clinical Laboratory News 2004;July:12-3
5. Becich MJ. Information management: moving from test results to clinical information. Clin Leadership Manag Rev 2000;14:296-9
6. Foubister V. Bench press: the technologist/technician shortfall is putting the squeeze on laboratories nationwide. CAP Today 2000;September:84
7. Report of the Review of NHS Pathology Services in England. An Independent Review for the Department of Health. London: Department of Health, 2006:6
8. First Report of the House of Commons Select Committee on Health, published 1 May 2002, para 141. See http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmhealth/308/30809.htm (last checked 9 August 2011)
9. DH Pathology Modernisation Team. Modernising Pathology Services. London: Department of Health, 2004:7
10. Forsman R. The electronic medical record: implications for the laboratory. Clin Leadership Manag Rev 2000;14:292-5
11. Bradshaw KE, Gardner RM, Clemmer TP, Orme JF, Thomas F, West BJ. Physician decision-making - evaluation of data used in a computerized ICU. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1984;1:81-91
12. Cited by Feist K. See http://www.executivewarcollege.com/2010/PDFs/Feist.pdf (last checked 9 August 2011)
13. The Value of Laboratory Medicine to Health Care. Chapter 1. In: The Lewin Group: Laboratory Medicine - A National Status Report. May 2008:19-65. See http://www.ascls-sd.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/laboratory_medicine_-_a_national_status_reportmay08. pdf (last checked 9 August 2011)