Modeling cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in hungary

Value in Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 39-45

  Vokó, Zoltán ^a,b   Nagyjánosi, László ^b   Margitai, Barnabás ^c   Kövi, Rita ^d   Tóth, Zoltán ^e   László, Dániel ^f   Kaló, Zoltán ^a,b  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b Syreon Research Institute   (Hungary)

^c Institute of Healthcare Quality Improvement   (Hungary)

^d National Health Insurance Fund   (Hungary)

^e UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^f Saint Stephen Hospital   (Hungary)

Author keywords

cost effectiveness; economic models; Hungary; mass screening; uterine cervical neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUNGARY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES; HUMANS; HUNGARY; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMIC; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEOPLASM STAGING; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 84856009967     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. EUROSTAT Statistics http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/ statistics/search-database [Accessed June 1, 2010]
2. I. Boncz, A. Sebestyn, I. Ember Organized, nationwide cervical cancer screening programme in Hungary Gynecol Oncol 106 2007 272 273 (Pubitemid 46908744)
3. A. Kovcs, L. Dbrssy, A. Budai Cervical screening in Hungary: why does the "English model" work but the "Hungarian model" does not? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29 2008 5 9 (Pubitemid 351344754)
4. J.S. Mandelblatt, W.F. Lawrence, L. Gaffikin Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 1469 1483 (Pubitemid 35243745)
5. U. Siebert, G. Sroczynski, P. Hillemanns The German cervical cancer screening model: development and validation of a decision-analytic model for cervical cancer screening in Germany Eur J Public Health 16 2006 185 192
6. A. Chuck Cost-effectiveness of 21 alternative cervical cancer screening strategies Value Health 13 2010 169 179
7. J.D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, N.K. Stout, J. Ortendahl Modeling human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in the United States for analyses of screening and vaccination Popul Health Metr 5 2007 11
8. J.D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, N.K. Stout, J. Ortendahl et al. An individual-based stochastic microsimulation of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in the United States Supplemental technical information: Model structure, parameterization, calibration, evaluation, screening and vaccination strategies http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/5/1/11/additional/ [Accessed March 3, 2009]
9. J. Smith, A. Melendy, R.K. Rana, J.M. Pimenta Age-specific prevalence of infection with human papillomavirus in females: a global review J Adolesc Health 43 2008 S5 S25
10. T. Nyri, L. Kalmr, C. Nyri Human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of low-risk women Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126 2006 246 249
11. I. Szende Quality of life J. Boros R. Nmeth J. Vitrai Final Report National Health Survey 2000 [in Hungarian] 2002 National Institute of Epidemiology Budapest, Hungary http://193.225.50.35/dokumentum/OLEF-2000/ kjelentes-lakossag-egeszsege.pdf [Accessed June 1, 2010]
12. K. Nanda, D.C. McCrory, E.R. Myers Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review Ann Intern Med 132 2000 810 819 (Pubitemid 30317797)
13. M.F. Mitchell, D. Schottenfeld, G. Tortolero-Luna Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 91 1998 626 631 (Pubitemid 28153058)
14. I. Pete, V. Tth, P. Bsze The value of colposcopy in screening cervical carcinoma Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 19 1998 120 122 (Pubitemid 28171296)
15. A. Szende, Z. Mogyorsy, N. Muszbek Methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation of healthcare interventions in Hungary: a Hungarian proposal for methodology standards Eur J Health Econ 3 2002 196 206 (Pubitemid 36406341)
16. OECD Principal economic indicators http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/54/ 18598754.pdf 2010 [Accessed June 1, 2010]
17. National College of Gynecologist, National College of Radiotherapy and Oncology Professional protocol of care for cervical cancer [in Hungarian] http://www.eum.hu/egeszsegpolitika/minosegfejlesztes/szuleszet-nogyogyaszat 2008 [Accessed June 1, 2010]
18. I. Boncz, A. Sebestyn, M. Pl Health economics analysis of cervical cancer screening [in Hungarian] Orv Hetil 144 2003 713 717
19. K.E. Richert-Boe, L.L. Humphrey Screening for cancers of the cervix and breast Arch Intern Med 152 1992 2405 2411