Imaging of gynecologic malignancies

Gynecologic Radiation Therapy: Novel Approaches to Image-Guidance and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3-18

  Olpin, Jeffrey ^a   Tempany, Clare M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856006908     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68958-4_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Merce LT, Alcazar JL, Lopez C, et al. Clinical usefulness of 3-dimensional sonography and power doppler angiography for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 1279-87.
2. Hardesty LA, Sumkin JH, Hakim C, et al. The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage endometrial carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 603-6.
3. Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Coakley F V, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology. 2007; 245: 491-8.
4. Hricak H, Yu K. Radiology in invasive cervical cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167: 1101-8.
5. Chao A, Chang TC, Ng K.K., et al. 18F-FDG PET in the management of endometrial cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33: 36-44.
6. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E., et al. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190: 1652-8.
7. Wong TZ, Jones EL, Coleman RE. Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F] fuoro-D-glucose for evaluating local and distant disease in patients with cervical cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004; 6: 55-62.
8. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57: 43-66.
9. Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M., et al. Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 2005; 238: 272-9.
10. Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu K.K., et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology. 1999; 212: 711-8.
11. Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T., et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26: 682-7.
12. Choi JY, Kim MJ, Chung Y.E., et al. Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. Radiographics. 2008; 28: 30.
13. de Souza N, Scoones D, Krausz T., et al. High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neo-plasia with a dedicated transvaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 166: 553-9.
14. Charles-Edwards E.M., Messiou C, Morgan V.A., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: potential value for improving tumor detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease. Radiology. 2008; 249: 541-50.
15. Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg S.M., et al. Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1000-1.
16. Swaminathan S, Shah SV. New insights into nephrogenic systemic fbrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18: 2636-43.
17. Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani M.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 2813-21.
18. Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonel H.M., et al. Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging - a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology. 2000; 216: 444-9.
19. Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E., et al. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 1577-87.
20. Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G., et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology. 2004; 231: 372-8.
21. Seki H, Kimura M, Sakai K. Myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma: assessment with dynamic MR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Clin Radiol. 1997; 52: 18-23.
22. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles L.G., et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology. 1988; 166: 623-31.
23. Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Magnotta V.A., et al. Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996; 36: 623-33.
24. Durfee SM, Zou KH, Muto M.G., Sheets EE, Tempany CMC. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in treatment planning of cervical carcinoma. J Womens Imag. 2000; 2: 63-8.
25. Parikh JH, Barton DP, Ind T.E., et al. MR imaging features of vaginal malignancies. Radiographics. 2008; 28: 49-63.