Free speech, racial intolerance and the right to offend: Bolt before the court

Alternative Law Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 225-229

  Joseph, Sarah ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855995178     PISSN: 1037969X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1037969X1103600402     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. [2011] FCA 1103.
2. Andrew Bolt, 'It's so hip to be black', Herald Sun (Melbourne), 15 April 2009
3. Andrew Bolt, 'White fellas in the black', Herald Sun (Melbourne), 21 August 2009.
4. See Eatock v Bolt, [196]-[211].
5. It may also be noted that Article 20 of the ICCPR (and Article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination) require States to prohibit racial hate speech. As noted, the Bolt decision did not explicitly concern racial vilification.
6. Eatock v Bolt, [16]
7. Eatock v Bolt, [171]
8. Eatock v Bolt, [362]
9. Eatock v Bolt, [444]
10. Eatock v Bolt, [323]-[324]
11. Eatock v Bolt, [267]
12. Eatock v Bolt, [267]
13. Eatock v Bolt, [267]
14. Eatock v Bolt, [295]
15. Eatock v Bolt, [151]
16. Eatock v Bolt, [296]
17. Eatock v Bolt, [350]
18. Eatock v Bolt, see [193]
19. Eatock v Bolt, [360]
20. Eatock v Bolt, [362]
21. Eatock v Bolt, [367]
22. See 'Andrew Bolt: Australia's least accurate columnist?', The Sunday Age (Melbourne), 2 October 2011, 5.
23. Eatock v Bolt, [388]
24. Eatock v Bolt, [405]
25. Eatock v Bolt, [425]
26. Eatock v Bolt, [444]
27. Eatock v Bolt, [423]
28. David Marr, 'In black and white, Andrew Bolt trifled with the facts', The Age (Melbourne), 29 September 2011.
29. Andrew Bolt, 'It's so hip to be black', Herald Sun (Melbourne), 15 April 2009
30. Eatock v Bolt, [36]
31. Andrew Bolt, 'Silencing me impedes unity', Herald Sun (Melbourne), 29 September 2011.
32. See Editorial, Crikey, 28 September 2011.
33. Andrew Bolt, 'Silencing me impedes unity', Herald Sun (Melbourne), 29 September 2011.