Upscaling of Coupled Land Surface Process Modeling for Heterogeneous Landscapes: Stochastic Approach

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1017-1029

  Kure, S ^a   Kavvas, M L ^a   Ohara, N ^a   Jang, S ^a  

^a University of California Davis   (United States)

Author keywords

Heterogeneity; Land surface parameterization; Probability density function; Process based modeling; Stochastic upscaling

Indexed keywords

HETEROGENEITY; LAND SURFACE PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITIES; PROCESS-BASED MODELING; UPSCALING;

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOKKER PLANCK EQUATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

SURFACE MEASUREMENT;

ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; CANOPY; CLIMATE MODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND SURFACE; LANDSCAPE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; STOCHASTICITY; WATERSHED;

EID: 84855979798     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000163     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ament F. Simmer C. Improved representation of land-surface heterogeneity in non-hydrostatic numerical weather prediction model. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2006, 121(1):153-174. BLMEBK, 0006-8314, 10.1007/s10546-006-9066-4.
2. Anthes R.A. Warner T.T. Development of hydrodynamic models suitable for air pollution and other mesometeorological studies. Mon. Weath. Rev. 1978, 106(8):1045-1078. MWREAB, 0027-0644, 10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<1045:DOHMSF>2.0.CO;2.
3. Avissar R. Pielke R.A. parameterization of heterogeneous land surface for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon. Weath. Rev. 1989, 117(10):2113-2136. MWREAB, 0027-0644, 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<2113:APOHLS>2.0.CO;2.
4. Chang J.S. Cooper G. practical differences scheme for Fokker-Planck equations. J. Comp. Phys. 1970, 6(1):1-16. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/0021-9991(70)90001-X.
5. Chen Z.Q. Govindaraju R.S. Kavvas M.L. Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields. 1. Development of models. Wat. Resour. Res. 1994, 30(2):523-533. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/93WR02885
6. Chen Z.Q. Govindaraju R.S. Kavvas M.L. Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields. 2. Numerical solutions. Wat. Resour. Res. 1994, 30(2):535-548. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/93WR02884
7. Deardorff J.W. Parameterization of the planetary boundary layer for use in general circulation models. Mon. Weath. Rev. 1972, 100(2):93-106. MWREAB, 0027-0644, 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0093:POTPBL>2.3.CO;2.
8. Deardorff J.W. three-dimensional numerical study of turbulence in an entraining mixed layer. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 1974, 7(2):199-226. BLMEBK, 0006-8314, 10.1007/BF00227913.
9. Deardorff J.W. Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with inclusion of layer of vegetation. J. Geophys. Res. 1978, 83(C4):1889-1903. JGREA2, 0148-0227, 10.1029/JC083iC04p01889.
10. Dickinson R.E. Sellers A.H. Kennedy P.J. Wilson M.F. Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR CCM. 1986 TN-275+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.
11. Entekhabi D. Eagleson P.S. Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability. J. Climate. 1989, 2(8):816-831. JLCLEL, 0894-8755, 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<0816:LSHPFA>2.0.CO;2.
12. Essery R.L. H. Best M.J. Betts R.A. Cox P.M. Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in GCM land surface scheme. J. Hydrometeorol. 2003, 4:530-543. 1525-755X, 10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<0530:EROSHI>2.0.CO;2.
13. Famiglietti J.S. Wood E.F. Evapotranspiration and runoff from large land areas: land surface hydrology for atmospheric general circulation models. Surveys in Geophys. 1991, 12(1-3):179-204. SUGEEC, 0169-3298, 10.1007/BF01903418.
14. Haltiner G.J. Williams R.T. Numerical prediction and dynamic meteorology 1980, and Wiley, New York.
15. Kavvas M.L. A regional-scale land surface parameterization based on areally-averaged hydrological conservation equations. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1998, 43(4):611-631. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1080/02626669809492157.
16. Kavvas M.L. Nonlinear hydrologic processes: Conservation equations for determining their means and probability distributions. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2003, 8(2):44-53. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(44).
17. Kavvas M.L. Wu J.L. Conservation equations for solute transport by unsteady and steady flows in heterogeneous aquifers: The cumulant expansion/Lie operator method. Stochastic methods in subsurface contaminant hydrology 2002, R. S. Govindaraju ed., ASCE, Reston, VA.
18. Kim S. Kavvas M.L. Chen Z.Q. Root-water uptake model at heterogeneous soil fields. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10(2):160-167. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:2(160).
19. Kim S. Kavvas M.L. Yoon J. Upscaling of vertical unsaturated flow model under infiltration condition. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10(2):151-159. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:2(151).
20. Koster R.D. Suarez M.J. comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representation. J. Climate. 1992, 5(12):1379-1390. JLCLEL, 0894-8755, 10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1379:ACAOTL>2.0.CO;2.
21. McCuen R.H. Rawls W.J. Brakensiek D.L. Statistical analysis of the Brooks-Corey and the Green-Ampt parameters across soil textures. Water Resour. Res. 1981, 17(4):1005-1013. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR017i004p01005.
22. Noilhan J. Planton S. simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon. Weath. Rev. 1989, 117(3):536-549. MWREAB, 0027-0644, 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0536:ASPOLS>2.0.CO;2.
23. Ohara N. Kavvas M.L. Chen Z.Q. Stochastic upscaling for snow accumulation and melt processes with PDF approach. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13(12):1103-1118. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:12(1103).
24. Palleschi V. Sarri F. Marcozzi G. Torquati M.R. Numerical solution of the Fokker-Planck equation: fast and accurate algorithm. Phys. Lett. 1990, 146:378-386. PYLAAG, 0375-9601, 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90717-3.
25. Perrier A. Itier B. Bertolini J.M. Katerji N. new device for continuous recording of the energy balance of natural surfaces. Agric. Met. 1976, 16(1):71-84. AGMYA6, 0002-1571, 10.1016/0002-1571(76)90069-8.
26. Sellers P.J. Mints Y. Sud Y.C. Dalcher A. simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci. 1986, 43(6):505-531. JAHSAK, 0022-4928, 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0505:ASBMFU>2.0.CO;2.
27. Seuffert G. Gross P. Simmer C. The influence of hydrologic modeling on the predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of mesoscale weather prediction model and land surface hydrologic model. J. Hydrometeor. 2002, 3(5):505-523. 1525-755X, 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0505:TIOHMO>2.0.CO;2.
28. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Data Base: User's Guide. 1991, Soil Conservation Service USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, TX.
29. Song J. Willmott C.J. Hanson B. Influence of heterogeneous land surfaces on surface energy and mass fluxes. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 1997, 58(3-4):175-188. TACLEK, 1434-4483, 10.1007/BF00865018.
30. Stull R.B. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology 1988, Kluwer Academic, London.
31. Tayfur G. Kavvas M.L. Areally-averaged overland flow equations at hillslope scale. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1998, 43(3):361-378. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1080/02626669809492132.
32. Wolfe R.E. Roy D.P. Vermote E. MODIS land data storage, gridding, and compositing methodlogy: level2 grid. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1998, 36(4):1324-1338. IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/36.701082.
33. Yoon J. Kavvas M.L. Probabilistic solution to stochastic overland flow equation. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2003, 8(2):54-63. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(54).