메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 328-340

Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation

Author keywords

Adjustment; Clinical trials; Covariates; Minimisation; Stratification; Unadjusted analysis

Indexed keywords

ALPHA INTERFERON; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; TAMOXIFEN; TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR;

EID: 84855936105     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4431     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (241)

References (43)
  • 1
    • 0024256065 scopus 로고
    • Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials
    • DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.
    • Lachin JM. Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988 9: 312-326, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.
    • (1988) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.9 , pp. 312-326
    • Lachin, J.M.1
  • 2
    • 0021812356 scopus 로고
    • Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review
    • DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040204.
    • Kalish LA, Begg CB. Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review. Statistics in Medicine 1985 4: 129-144, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040204.
    • (1985) Statistics in Medicine , vol.4 , pp. 129-144
    • Kalish, L.A.1    Begg, C.B.2
  • 4
    • 0000399144 scopus 로고
    • Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced
    • DOI: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403.
    • Efron B. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika 1971 58(3): 403-417, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403.
    • (1971) Biometrika , vol.58 , Issue.3 , pp. 403-417
    • Efron, B.1
  • 5
    • 0024262955 scopus 로고
    • Properties of urn randomisation in clinical trials
    • DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90048-7.
    • Wei LJ, Lachin JM. Properties of urn randomisation in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1994 9: 345-364, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90048-7.
    • (1994) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.9 , pp. 345-364
    • Wei, L.J.1    Lachin, J.M.2
  • 6
    • 0001863446 scopus 로고
    • Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors
    • DOI: 10.1093/biomet/69.1.61.
    • Atkinson AC. Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors. Biometrika 1982 69(1): 61-67, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/69.1.61.
    • (1982) Biometrika , vol.69 , Issue.1 , pp. 61-67
    • Atkinson, A.C.1
  • 7
    • 0016799829 scopus 로고
    • Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial
    • Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975 31: 103-115.
    • (1975) Biometrics , vol.31 , pp. 103-115
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Simon, R.2
  • 8
    • 77952769492 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials
    • DOI: 10.1177/1740774510368301.
    • Pond GR, Tang PA, Welch SA, Chen EX. Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2010 7: 227-234, DOI: 10.1177/1740774510368301.
    • (2010) Clinical Trials , vol.7 , pp. 227-234
    • Pond, G.R.1    Tang, P.A.2    Welch, S.A.3    Chen, E.X.4
  • 9
    • 0036916803 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials a review
    • DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8.
    • Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, Campbell MK. The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials a review. Controlled Clinical Trials 2002 23(6): 662-674, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8.
    • (2002) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.23 , Issue.6 , pp. 662-674
    • Scott, N.W.1    McPherson, G.C.2    Ramsay, C.R.3    Campbell, M.K.4
  • 10
    • 0037117110 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing
    • DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08029-7.
    • Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing. The Lancet 2002 359(9310): 966-970, DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08029-7.
    • (2002) The Lancet , vol.359 , Issue.9310 , pp. 966-970
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Grimes, D.A.2
  • 11
    • 2342468751 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Points to consider on adjustment for baseline covariates
    • Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. DOI:10.1002/sim.1647
    • Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on adjustment for baseline covariates. Statistics in Medicine 2004 23: 701-709, DOI:10.1002/sim.1647.
    • (2004) Statistics in Medicine , vol.23 , pp. 701-709
  • 12
    • 0033566769 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistical principles for clinical trials: ICH harmonised tripartite guideline
    • ICH E9 Expert Working Group. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990815)18:15%3C1903::AID-SIM188%3E3.0.CO;2-F
    • ICH E9 Expert Working Group. Statistical principles for clinical trials: ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Statistics in Medicine 1999 18: 1905-1942, DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990815)18:15%3C1903::AID-SIM188%3E3.0.CO;2-F.
    • (1999) Statistics in Medicine , vol.18 , pp. 1905-1942
  • 13
    • 0033920289 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial
    • DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00061-1.
    • Raab GM, Day S, Sales J. How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 2000 21: 330-342, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00061-1.
    • (2000) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.21 , pp. 330-342
    • Raab, G.M.1    Day, S.2    Sales, J.3
  • 18
    • 0024244278 scopus 로고
    • Randomization in clinical trials: conclusions and recommendations
    • DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(88)90049-9.
    • Lachin JM, Matts JP, Wei LJ. Randomization in clinical trials: conclusions and recommendations. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988 9: 365-374, DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(88)90049-9.
    • (1988) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.9 , pp. 365-374
    • Lachin, J.M.1    Matts, J.P.2    Wei, L.J.3
  • 19
    • 0037108235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems
    • DOI:10.1002/sim.1296.
    • Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine 2002 21: 2917-2930, DOI:10.1002/sim.1296.
    • (2002) Statistics in Medicine , vol.21 , pp. 2917-2930
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Assmann, S.E.2    Enos, L.E.3    Kasten, L.E.4
  • 25
    • 20244380619 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Treatment allocation by minimisation
    • DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843.
    • Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ 2005 330(7495): 843+, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.330 , Issue.7495
    • Altman, D.G.1    Bland, J.M.2
  • 26
    • 0037045587 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice
    • DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
    • Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet 2002 359: 515-519, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
    • (2002) Lancet , vol.359 , pp. 515-519
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Grimes, D.A.2
  • 27
    • 0034436625 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study
    • DOI: 10.1023/A:1010907912024.
    • Rovers MM, Straatman H, Zielhuis GA. Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study. European Journal of Epidemiology 2000 16: 1123-1129, DOI: 10.1023/A:1010907912024.
    • (2000) European Journal of Epidemiology , vol.16 , pp. 1123-1129
    • Rovers, M.M.1    Straatman, H.2    Zielhuis, G.A.3
  • 28
    • 0037445413 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial
    • DOI:10.1002/sim.1366.
    • Weir CJ, Lees KR. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 2003 22: 705-726, DOI:10.1002/sim.1366.
    • (2003) Statistics in Medicine , vol.22 , pp. 705-726
    • Weir, C.J.1    Lees, K.R.2
  • 29
    • 0344522119 scopus 로고
    • Validity and power of tests when groups have been balanced for prognostic factors
    • DOI: 10.1016/0167-9473(87)90015-6.
    • Forsyth AB. Validity and power of tests when groups have been balanced for prognostic factors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1987 5: 193-200, DOI: 10.1016/0167-9473(87)90015-6.
    • (1987) Computational Statistics and Data Analysis , vol.5 , pp. 193-200
    • Forsyth, A.B.1
  • 31
    • 0021841237 scopus 로고
    • Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials
    • DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90120-5.
    • Birkett NJ. Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1985 6: 146-155, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90120-5.
    • (1985) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.6 , pp. 146-155
    • Birkett, N.J.1
  • 32
    • 0032395599 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does clustering affect the usual test statistics of no treatment effect in a randomized clinical trial?
    • DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199808)40:4%3C385::AID-BIMJ385%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
    • Parzen M, Lipsitz SR, Dear KBG. Does clustering affect the usual test statistics of no treatment effect in a randomized clinical trial?Biometrical Journal 1998 40(4): 385-402, DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199808)40:4%3C385::AID-BIMJ385%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
    • (1998) Biometrical Journal , vol.40 , Issue.4 , pp. 385-402
    • Parzen, M.1    Lipsitz, S.R.2    Dear, K.B.G.3
  • 33
    • 0031777876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials?
    • DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00147-5.
    • Hauck WW, Anderson S, Marcus SM. Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials?Controlled Clinical Trials 1998 19: 249-256, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00147-5.
    • (1998) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.19 , pp. 249-256
    • Hauck, W.W.1    Anderson, S.2    Marcus, S.M.3
  • 34
    • 0000029731 scopus 로고
    • Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models
    • Robinson LD, Jewell NP. Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. International Statistical Review 1991 58: 227-240.
    • (1991) International Statistical Review , vol.58 , pp. 227-240
    • Robinson, L.D.1    Jewell, N.P.2
  • 35
    • 77249104037 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery
    • DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-17.
    • McGregor AH, Doré CJ, Morris TP, Morris S, Jamrozik K. Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010 11(1): 17+, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-17.
    • (2010) BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders , vol.11 , Issue.1
    • McGregor, A.H.1    Doré, C.J.2    Morris, T.P.3    Morris, S.4    Jamrozik, K.5
  • 38
    • 19944372078 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models
    • DOI:10.1002/sim.2059.
    • Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Statistics in Medicine 2005 24, DOI:10.1002/sim.2059.
    • (2005) Statistics in Medicine , vol.24
    • Bender, R.1    Augustin, T.2    Blettner, M.3
  • 42
    • 0024845507 scopus 로고
    • The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials
    • DOI:10.1002/sim.4780081202.
    • Freeman PR. The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials. Statistics in Medicine 1989 8(12): 1421-1432, DOI:10.1002/sim.4780081202.
    • (1989) Statistics in Medicine , vol.8 , Issue.12 , pp. 1421-1432
    • Freeman, P.R.1
  • 43
    • 0024274355 scopus 로고
    • Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials
    • DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5
    • Matts JP, Lachin JM. Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988 9(4): 327-344, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5.
    • (1988) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.9 , Issue.4 , pp. 327-344
    • Matts, J.P.1    Lachin, J.M.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.