-
1
-
-
0024256065
-
Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials
-
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.
-
Lachin JM. Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988 9: 312-326, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.
-
(1988)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.9
, pp. 312-326
-
-
Lachin, J.M.1
-
2
-
-
0021812356
-
Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review
-
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040204.
-
Kalish LA, Begg CB. Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review. Statistics in Medicine 1985 4: 129-144, DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040204.
-
(1985)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.4
, pp. 129-144
-
-
Kalish, L.A.1
Begg, C.B.2
-
4
-
-
0000399144
-
Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced
-
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403.
-
Efron B. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika 1971 58(3): 403-417, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403.
-
(1971)
Biometrika
, vol.58
, Issue.3
, pp. 403-417
-
-
Efron, B.1
-
5
-
-
0024262955
-
Properties of urn randomisation in clinical trials
-
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90048-7.
-
Wei LJ, Lachin JM. Properties of urn randomisation in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1994 9: 345-364, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90048-7.
-
(1994)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.9
, pp. 345-364
-
-
Wei, L.J.1
Lachin, J.M.2
-
6
-
-
0001863446
-
Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors
-
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/69.1.61.
-
Atkinson AC. Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors. Biometrika 1982 69(1): 61-67, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/69.1.61.
-
(1982)
Biometrika
, vol.69
, Issue.1
, pp. 61-67
-
-
Atkinson, A.C.1
-
7
-
-
0016799829
-
Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial
-
Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975 31: 103-115.
-
(1975)
Biometrics
, vol.31
, pp. 103-115
-
-
Pocock, S.J.1
Simon, R.2
-
8
-
-
77952769492
-
Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials
-
DOI: 10.1177/1740774510368301.
-
Pond GR, Tang PA, Welch SA, Chen EX. Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2010 7: 227-234, DOI: 10.1177/1740774510368301.
-
(2010)
Clinical Trials
, vol.7
, pp. 227-234
-
-
Pond, G.R.1
Tang, P.A.2
Welch, S.A.3
Chen, E.X.4
-
9
-
-
0036916803
-
The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials a review
-
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8.
-
Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, Campbell MK. The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials a review. Controlled Clinical Trials 2002 23(6): 662-674, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8.
-
(2002)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.23
, Issue.6
, pp. 662-674
-
-
Scott, N.W.1
McPherson, G.C.2
Ramsay, C.R.3
Campbell, M.K.4
-
10
-
-
0037117110
-
Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing
-
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08029-7.
-
Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing. The Lancet 2002 359(9310): 966-970, DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08029-7.
-
(2002)
The Lancet
, vol.359
, Issue.9310
, pp. 966-970
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Grimes, D.A.2
-
11
-
-
2342468751
-
Points to consider on adjustment for baseline covariates
-
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. DOI:10.1002/sim.1647
-
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on adjustment for baseline covariates. Statistics in Medicine 2004 23: 701-709, DOI:10.1002/sim.1647.
-
(2004)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.23
, pp. 701-709
-
-
-
12
-
-
0033566769
-
Statistical principles for clinical trials: ICH harmonised tripartite guideline
-
ICH E9 Expert Working Group. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990815)18:15%3C1903::AID-SIM188%3E3.0.CO;2-F
-
ICH E9 Expert Working Group. Statistical principles for clinical trials: ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Statistics in Medicine 1999 18: 1905-1942, DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990815)18:15%3C1903::AID-SIM188%3E3.0.CO;2-F.
-
(1999)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.18
, pp. 1905-1942
-
-
-
13
-
-
0033920289
-
How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial
-
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00061-1.
-
Raab GM, Day S, Sales J. How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 2000 21: 330-342, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00061-1.
-
(2000)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.21
, pp. 330-342
-
-
Raab, G.M.1
Day, S.2
Sales, J.3
-
14
-
-
0032921516
-
Stratified randomization for clinical trials
-
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00138-3.
-
Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Makuch RW, Brass LM, Horwitz RI. Stratified randomization for clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1999 52: 19-26, DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00138-3.
-
(1999)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.52
, pp. 19-26
-
-
Kernan, W.N.1
Viscoli, C.M.2
Makuch, R.W.3
Brass, L.M.4
Horwitz, R.I.5
-
18
-
-
0024244278
-
Randomization in clinical trials: conclusions and recommendations
-
DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(88)90049-9.
-
Lachin JM, Matts JP, Wei LJ. Randomization in clinical trials: conclusions and recommendations. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988 9: 365-374, DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(88)90049-9.
-
(1988)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.9
, pp. 365-374
-
-
Lachin, J.M.1
Matts, J.P.2
Wei, L.J.3
-
19
-
-
0037108235
-
Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems
-
DOI:10.1002/sim.1296.
-
Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine 2002 21: 2917-2930, DOI:10.1002/sim.1296.
-
(2002)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.21
, pp. 2917-2930
-
-
Pocock, S.J.1
Assmann, S.E.2
Enos, L.E.3
Kasten, L.E.4
-
21
-
-
0038024620
-
-
Oxford University Press:Oxford
-
Girling D, Parmar M, Stenning S, Stephens R, Stewart L. Clinical Trials in Cancer: Principles and Practice, Oxford University Press:Oxford, 2003.
-
(2003)
Clinical Trials in Cancer: Principles and Practice
-
-
Girling, D.1
Parmar, M.2
Stenning, S.3
Stephens, R.4
Stewart, L.5
-
25
-
-
20244380619
-
Treatment allocation by minimisation
-
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843.
-
Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ 2005 330(7495): 843+, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843.
-
(2005)
BMJ
, vol.330
, Issue.7495
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
Bland, J.M.2
-
26
-
-
0037045587
-
Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice
-
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
-
Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet 2002 359: 515-519, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
-
(2002)
Lancet
, vol.359
, pp. 515-519
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Grimes, D.A.2
-
27
-
-
0034436625
-
Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study
-
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010907912024.
-
Rovers MM, Straatman H, Zielhuis GA. Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study. European Journal of Epidemiology 2000 16: 1123-1129, DOI: 10.1023/A:1010907912024.
-
(2000)
European Journal of Epidemiology
, vol.16
, pp. 1123-1129
-
-
Rovers, M.M.1
Straatman, H.2
Zielhuis, G.A.3
-
28
-
-
0037445413
-
Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial
-
DOI:10.1002/sim.1366.
-
Weir CJ, Lees KR. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 2003 22: 705-726, DOI:10.1002/sim.1366.
-
(2003)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.22
, pp. 705-726
-
-
Weir, C.J.1
Lees, K.R.2
-
29
-
-
0344522119
-
Validity and power of tests when groups have been balanced for prognostic factors
-
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9473(87)90015-6.
-
Forsyth AB. Validity and power of tests when groups have been balanced for prognostic factors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1987 5: 193-200, DOI: 10.1016/0167-9473(87)90015-6.
-
(1987)
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
, vol.5
, pp. 193-200
-
-
Forsyth, A.B.1
-
30
-
-
9944220574
-
Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials
-
Hagino A, Hamada C, Yoshimura I, Ohashi Y, Sakamoto J, Nakazato H. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 2004 25: 572-584.
-
(2004)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.25
, pp. 572-584
-
-
Hagino, A.1
Hamada, C.2
Yoshimura, I.3
Ohashi, Y.4
Sakamoto, J.5
Nakazato, H.6
-
31
-
-
0021841237
-
Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials
-
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90120-5.
-
Birkett NJ. Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1985 6: 146-155, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90120-5.
-
(1985)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.6
, pp. 146-155
-
-
Birkett, N.J.1
-
32
-
-
0032395599
-
Does clustering affect the usual test statistics of no treatment effect in a randomized clinical trial?
-
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199808)40:4%3C385::AID-BIMJ385%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
-
Parzen M, Lipsitz SR, Dear KBG. Does clustering affect the usual test statistics of no treatment effect in a randomized clinical trial?Biometrical Journal 1998 40(4): 385-402, DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199808)40:4%3C385::AID-BIMJ385%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
-
(1998)
Biometrical Journal
, vol.40
, Issue.4
, pp. 385-402
-
-
Parzen, M.1
Lipsitz, S.R.2
Dear, K.B.G.3
-
33
-
-
0031777876
-
Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials?
-
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00147-5.
-
Hauck WW, Anderson S, Marcus SM. Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials?Controlled Clinical Trials 1998 19: 249-256, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00147-5.
-
(1998)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.19
, pp. 249-256
-
-
Hauck, W.W.1
Anderson, S.2
Marcus, S.M.3
-
34
-
-
0000029731
-
Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models
-
Robinson LD, Jewell NP. Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. International Statistical Review 1991 58: 227-240.
-
(1991)
International Statistical Review
, vol.58
, pp. 227-240
-
-
Robinson, L.D.1
Jewell, N.P.2
-
35
-
-
77249104037
-
Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery
-
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-17.
-
McGregor AH, Doré CJ, Morris TP, Morris S, Jamrozik K. Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010 11(1): 17+, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-17.
-
(2010)
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
, vol.11
, Issue.1
-
-
McGregor, A.H.1
Doré, C.J.2
Morris, T.P.3
Morris, S.4
Jamrozik, K.5
-
36
-
-
80051618075
-
Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection
-
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012740.
-
Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C, Peckham D, Davies CWH, Ali N, Kinnear Wet al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2011 365(6): 518-526, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012740.
-
(2011)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.365
, Issue.6
, pp. 518-526
-
-
Rahman, N.M.1
Maskell, N.A.2
West, A.3
Teoh, R.4
Arnold, A.5
Mackinlay, C.6
Peckham, D.7
Davies, C.W.H.8
Ali, N.9
Kinnear, W.10
-
38
-
-
19944372078
-
Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models
-
DOI:10.1002/sim.2059.
-
Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Statistics in Medicine 2005 24, DOI:10.1002/sim.2059.
-
(2005)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.24
-
-
Bender, R.1
Augustin, T.2
Blettner, M.3
-
40
-
-
77950273246
-
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
-
Moher D, Hopewell D, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. British Medical Journal 2010 240, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
-
(2010)
British Medical Journal
, vol.240
-
-
Moher, D.1
Hopewell, D.2
Schulz, K.F.3
Montori, V.4
Gøtzsche, P.C.5
Devereaux, P.J.6
Elbourne, D.7
Egger, M.8
Altman, D.G.9
-
42
-
-
0024845507
-
The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials
-
DOI:10.1002/sim.4780081202.
-
Freeman PR. The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials. Statistics in Medicine 1989 8(12): 1421-1432, DOI:10.1002/sim.4780081202.
-
(1989)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.8
, Issue.12
, pp. 1421-1432
-
-
Freeman, P.R.1
-
43
-
-
0024274355
-
Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials
-
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5
-
Matts JP, Lachin JM. Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1988 9(4): 327-344, DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5.
-
(1988)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.9
, Issue.4
, pp. 327-344
-
-
Matts, J.P.1
Lachin, J.M.2
|