Price projections of feedstocks for biofuels and biopower in the U.S.

Energy Policy

Volumn 41, Issue , 2012, Pages 484-493

  Langholtz, Matthew ^a   Graham, Robin ^a   Eaton, Laurence ^a   Perlack, Robert ^a   Hellwinkel, Chad ^b   De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel G ^b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural policy analysis; Bioenergy; U.S. Energy independence and security act

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLICIES; AGRICULTURE SECTORS; BIO-POWER; BIOENERGY; BIOMASS RESOURCES; COMMERCIAL VIABILITY; CRITICAL COMPONENT; ECONOMIC MODELS; ENERGY INDEPENDENCE; HARVEST COST;

AGRICULTURE; BIOFUELS;

COSTS;

AGRICULTURAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL PRICE; BIOAVAILABILITY; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS POWER; COST; MODELING; POLICY ANALYSIS; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; RESOURCE ECONOMY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855935788     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aliston J.M., Norton G., Pardey P.G. Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting 1995, Cornell University Press, Ithinca, NY.
2. Boundy B., Davis S., Wright L.L., Badger P., Perlack R. Biomass Energy Data Book: Edition 3 2010, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
3. CTIC National crop residue management survey, 1989-2004 2005, Conservation Technology Information Ctr, West Lafayette, IN.
4. De la Torre Ugarte, D., English, B., Hellwinckel, C., West, C., Jensen, C.W., Clark, C., Menand, R., 2009. Analysis of the Implications of Climate Change and Energy Legislation to the Agricultural Sector, Publication of the 25×'25 Working Group, Washington, DC.
5. De la Torre Ugarte, D., English, B., Jensen, K., Hellwinckel, C., Menard, J., Wilson, B., 2006. Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding the Production and Utilization of Ethanol and Biodiesel, Final Report. Study funded by the National Commission on Energy Policy and the Governors' Ethanol Coalition.
6. De la Torre Ugarte D., Ray D.E. Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework. Biomass & Bioenergy 2000, 18:291-308.
7. Dicks M., Campiche J., De la Torre Ugarte D., Hellwinckel C., Bryant H., Richardson J. Land use implications of expanding biofuel demand. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2009, 41:435-453.
8. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2010 2010, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, p. 231.
9. English B., De la Torre Ugarte D., Hellwinckel C., Jensen K., Menard R.J., West T.O., Clark C. Implications of Energy and Carbon Policies for the Agriculture and Forestry Sectors 2010, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Institute of Agriculture, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
10. Hellwinckel C., West T.O., De la Torre Ugarte D., Perlack R. Evaluating possible cap and trade legislation on cellulosic feedstock availability. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 2010, 2:278-287.
11. Jager H.I., Baskaran L.M., Brandt C.C., Davis E.B., Gunderson C.A., Wullschleger S.D. Empirical geographic modeling of switchgrass yields in the United States. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 2010, 2:248-257.
12. Larson J., Hellwinckel C., English B., De la Torre Ugarte D., West T.O., Menard R. Economic and environmental impacts of the corn grain ethanol industry on the United States agricultural sector. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2010, 65:12.
13. Lin W., Westcott P., Skinner R., Sanford S., De la Torre Ugarte D. Supply Response under the 1996 Farm Act and Implications for the U.S. Field Crops Sector 2000, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
14. Piggot R.R. Some old truths revisited. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 1992, 26:117-140.
15. Ray D., De la Torre Ugarte D., Dicks M., Tiller K. The POLYSYS Modeling Framework: A Documentation 1998, Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
16. Smith, W., Miles, P., Perry, C.H., Pugh, S., 2009. Forest Resources of the United States, 2007, In: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Ed.), Washington, DC, p. 336.
17. U.S. Department of Energy Biomass Multi-Year Program Plan, March 2010 2010, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington DC, pp. 1-206.
18. U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. R.D. Perlack and B.J. Stokes (Leads), ORNL/TM-2011/224 2011, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 227p.
19. USDA-OCE USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2020 2009, Office of the Chief Economist, U.S.D.o.A., Washington, DC.
20. Walsh M., English B., De la Torre Ugarte D., Jensen K., Hellwinckel C., Menard R., Nelson R. Agricultural impacts of biofuels produciton. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2007, 39:365-372.
21. Weimar, M.R., Stillman, R.P. 1990. A long term forecasting model of the livestock and poultry sectors. In: Proceedings of the NCR134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management. Chicago, IL.