Risk stratification of patients suspected of coronary artery disease: Comparison of five different models

Atherosclerosis

Volumn 220, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 557-562

  Jensen, Jesper M ^a   Voss, Mette ^a   Hansen, Vibeke B ^a   Andersen, Lone K ^a   Johansen, Peter B ^a   Munkholm, Henrik ^a   Nørgaard, Bjarne L ^a  

^a LILLEBAELT HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Risk factors; Risk stratification

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RISK; CORONARY RISK SCORE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAMOND FORRESTER MODEL; DUKE MODEL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORISE MODEL; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; THORAX PAIN;

AGED; ANGINA, STABLE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DENMARK; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84855934792     PISSN: 00219150     EISSN: 18791484     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fox K., Garcia M.A., Ardissino D., et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:1341-1381.
2. Lloyd-Jones D., Adams R.J., Brown T.M., et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010, 121:948-954.
3. Tavris D.R., Gallauresi B.A., Lin B., et al. Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use and gender. J Invasive Cardiol 2004, 16:459-464.
4. Falk E. Coronary artery narrowing without irreversible myocardial damage or development of collaterals assessment of " critical" stenosis in a human model. Br Heart J 1982, 48:265-271.
5. Little W.C. Angiographic assessment of the culprit coronary artery lesion before acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1990, 66:44G-47G.
6. Diamond G.A., Forrester J.S. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979, 300:1350-1358.
7. Pryor D.B., Shaw L., McCants C.B., et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:81-90.
8. Morise A.P., Haddad W.J., Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997, 102:350-356.
9. Genders T.S., Steyerberg E.W., Alkadhi H., et al. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 2010, 32:1316-1330.
10. Morise A.P. Comparison of the Diamond-Forrester method and a new score to estimate the pretest probability of coronary disease before exercise testing. Am Heart J 1999, 138:740-745.
11. Jensen J.M., Ovrehus K.A., Nielsen L.H., et al. Paradigm of pretest risk stratification before coronary computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009, 3:386-391.
12. Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976, 54:522-523.
13. Diamond G.A. A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983, 1:574-575.
14. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
15. Vergara I.A., Norambuena T., Ferrada E., et al. StAR: a simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:265.
16. Pencina M.J., D'Agostino R.B., D'Agostino R.B., et al. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008, 27:157-172.
17. Cook N.R., Ridker P.M. Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures. Ann Intern Med 2009, 150:795-802.
18. Kundu S., Aulchenko Y.S., van Duijn C.M., et al. PredictABEL: an R package for the assessment of risk prediction models. Eur J Epidemiol 2011, 26:261-264.
19. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978, 6:461-464.
20. Ranucci M., Castelvecchio S. The ACEF score one year after: a skeleton waiting for muscles, skin, and internal organs. EuroIntervention 2010, 6:549-553.
21. Peduzzi P., Concato J., Kemper E., et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49:1373-1379.
22. Ergin A., Muntner P., Sherwin R., et al. Secular trends in cardiovascular disease mortality, incidence, and case fatality rates in adults in the United States. Am J Med 2004, 117:219-227.
23. Arciero T.J., Jacobsen S.J., Reeder G.S., et al. Temporal trends in the incidence of coronary disease. Am J Med 2004, 117:228-233.