Value-transformation for monotone prediction by approximating fuzzy membership functions

12th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics, CINTI 2011 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 367-372

  Horváth, Tomáš ^a,d   Eckhardt, Alan ^b   Buza, Krisztián ^c   Vojtáš, Peter ^b   Schmidt Thieme, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HILDESHEIM   (Germany)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^d P J AFÁRIK UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTE VALUES; BENCHMARK DATASETS; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; FUZZY MEMBERSHIP FUNCTION; LINEAR ORDERINGS; MONOTONICITY CONSTRAINT; NUMERICAL ATTRIBUTES; PREDICTION PROBLEM; REAL VALUES; REAL-WORLD SCENARIO; UCI MACHINE LEARNING REPOSITORY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FORECASTING; INFORMATION SCIENCE;

MEMBERSHIP FUNCTIONS;

EID: 84855930929     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CINTI.2011.6108533     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. E. Altendorf, A. Restificar and T. Dietterich, Learning from Sparse Data by Exploiting Monotonicity Constraints, in: 21st Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, AUAI Press, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2005, pp. 18-26.
2. A. Ben-David, Monotonicity Maintenance in Information-Theoretic Machine Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning 19 (1995), 29-43.
3. A. Ben-David, L. Sterling and Y. Pao, Learning and classification of monotonic ordinal concepts, Computational Intelligence 5, 1 (1989), 45-49.
4. A. Ben-David, L. Sterling and T. Tran, Adding monotonicity to learning algorithms may impair their accuracy, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009), 6627-6634.
5. J. C. Bioch and V. Popova, Induction of Ordinal Decision Trees: An MCDA Approach, in: ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2003-008-LIS (2003).
6. K. Cao-Van, Supervised Ranking, from semantics to algorithms, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Science, University of Ghent, Belgium (2003).
7. W. Chu and S.S. Keerthi, New approaches to support vector ordinal regression, in: 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ACM, New York, USA, 2005, pp. 145-152.
8. H. Daniels and B. Kamp, Application of MLP networks to bond rating and house pricing, Neural Commuting & Applications 8 (1999), 226-234.
9. H. Daniels and M. Velikova, Derivation of monotone decision models from non-monotone data, Discussion Paper 30, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research, 2003.
10. W. Duivesteijn and A. Feelders, Nearest Neighbour Classification with Monotonicity Constraints, in: European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - Part I, LNAI vol. 5211, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 301-316.
11. A. Eckhardt, T. Horváth and P. Vojtáš, PHASES: A User Profile Learning Approach for Web Search, in: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 780-783.
12. R. Fagin, A. Lotem and M. Naor, Optimal Aggregation Algorithms for Middleware, in: 20th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, ACM, 2001, pp. 102-113.
13. A. J. Feelders, M. Velikova and H. Daniels, Two polynomial algorithms for relabeling non-monotone data, Technical Report UU-CS-2006-046, Utrecht University, Niederland, 2006, pp: 12.
14. E. Frank and E. Hall, A Simple Approach to Ordinal Classificaiton, in: 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, LNCS vol. 2167, Springer-Verlag London, UK (2001), pp. 145-156.
15. J. Gama and P. Brazdil, Characterization of Classification Algorithms, in: 7th Portuguese Conference on Artificial intelligence, Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 990, Springer-Verlag, 1995, pp. 189-200.
16. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning (2nd edition), Springer-Verlag, 2008.
17. T. Horváth, A Model of User Preference Learning for Content-Based Recommender Systems, COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS Vol. 28, No. 4 (2009), 453-881.
18. K. De Loof, B. De Baets and H. De Meyer, On the random generation of monotone data sets, Information Processing Letters 107 (2008), 216-220.
19. P. McCullagh, Regression models for ordinal data, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 42(2) (1980), 109-142.
20. R. Potharst, A. Ben-David and M. van Wezel, Two algorithms for generating structured and unstructured monotone ordinal data sets, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22 (2009), 491-496.
21. R. Potharst and A. J. Feelders, Classification trees for problems with monotonicity constraints, SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 4, 1 (2002), 1-10.
22. M. Rademaker, B. De Baets and H. De Meyer, Loss optimal monotone relabeling of noisy multi-criteria data sets, Information Sciences 179, 24 (2009), 4089-4096.
23. A. Asuncion and D.J. Newman, UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html, University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA, 2007.
24. M. Velikova, Monotone Models for Prediction in Data Mining, PhD Thesis, Tilburg University, Netherland, 2006.
25. M. Velikova and H. Daniels, On Testing Monotonicity of Datasets, in: Workshop on Learning Monotone Models from Data at European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Bled, Slovenia, 2009, pp. 11-22.