The influence of sperm morphology, total motile sperm count of semen and the number of motile sperm inseminated in sperm samples on the success of intrauterine insemination

International Journal of Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 168-173

  Nikbakht, Roshan ^a   Saharkhiz, Nasrin ^a  

^a AHVAZ JUNDISHAPUR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Insemination; Intrauterine; Morphology; Motile sperm

Indexed keywords

CLOMIFENE CITRATE; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGNOSIS; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855883867     PISSN: 2008076X     EISSN: 20080778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Speroff L, Fritz Marc A. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 7th ed. Philadelphia:Lippincott Willams and Wilkins; 2005; 1156-1157.
2. Le Lannou D. Intrauterine insemination, indication and results. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1994; 22(6): 361-369.
3. Ombelet W, Puttemans P, Bossmans E. Intrauterine insemination: a first-step procedure in the algorithm of male subfertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10 (suppl 1): 90-102.
4. Branigan EF, Estes MA, Muller CH. Advanced semen analysis: a simple screening test to predict intrauterine insemination success. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71(3): 547-551.
5. Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S. Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod update. 2002; 8(4): 373-384.
6. Van Weert JM, Repping S, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Van der Veen F, Mol BW. IUI in male subfertility: are we able to select the proper patients? Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11(5): 624-631.
7. Van Weert JM, Repping S, VanVoorhis BJ, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(3): 612-620.
8. Miller DC, Hollenback BK, Smith GD, Randolph JF, Christman GM, Smith YR, et al. Proccessed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology. 2002; 60(3): 497-501.
9. Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Rosenthal G, Dawson J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(4): 661-668.
10. Van der Westerlaken LA, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Gende. 1998; 15(6): 359-364.
11. Lee RK, Hou JW, Ho HY, Hwu YM, Lin MH, Tsai YC, Su JT. Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination. Int J Androl. 2002; 25(5): 277-280.
12. Wainer R, Albert M, Dorion A, Bailly M, Berg'ere M, Lomberse R, et al. Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(9): 2060-2065.
13. Ombelet W, Vande put H, Vande Putte G, Cox A, Janssen M, Jacobs P, et al. Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(7): 1458-1463.
14. Horvath PM, Bohrer M, Shelden RM, Kemmann E. The relationship of sperm parameters to cycle fecundity in super ovulated women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 1989; 52(2): 288-294.
15. WHO Laboratory Manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions. 4th ed. Cambridge,United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2000; 4-22.
16. Wainer R, Merlet F, Bailly M, Lombrose R, Camus E, Bisson JP. Prognosis for intrauterine insemination with partner's sperm according to the characteristics of the spermatozoa. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1996; 24: 897-903.
17. Ebrahimi M, Akbari AF, Darvish S. The effect of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates of the stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with unexplained infertility. Int J Fertil Steril. 2010; 4(2): 51-56.
18. Basirat Z, Esmaeilzadeh S. Prognostic factors of pregnancy in 500 cases of intrauterine insemination in Babol, northern Iran. Int J Fertil Steril. 2010; 4 (1): 35-39.
19. Akanji Tijani H, Bhattacharya S. The role of intrauterine insemination in male infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010; 13(4): 226-232.
20. Dorjpurev U, Kuwahara A, Yano Y, Taniguchi T, Yamamoto Y, Suto A, et al. Effect of semen characteristics on pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination. J Med Invest. 2011; 58(1-2): 127-133.
21. Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG, Comte I, Pache T, et al. Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11(14): 732-736.
22. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, Van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46(6): 1118-1123.
23. Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Morshedi M, Veeck L, Swanson RJ, Simmons K, et al. Corrective measures and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization in patients with severe sperm morphology abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 1998; 50(2): 283-287.
24. Berg U, Brucker C, Berg FD. Effect of motile sperm count after swim- up on outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 1997; 67(4): 747-750.
25. Tay PY, Raj VR, Kulenthran A, Sitizawiah O. Prognostic factors influencing pregnancy rate after stimulated intrauterine insemination. Med J Malaysia. 2007; 62(4): 286-289.
26. Dadkhah F, Nahabidian A, Ahmadi GH. The correlation between semen parameters in processed and unprocessed semen with pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination in the treatment of male factor infertility. Urol J. 2004; 1(4): 273-275.
27. Motazedian SH, Hamedi B, Zolghadri J, Mojtahedi KH, Asadi N. Outcome of IUI based on sperm morphology in cases of unexplained and male factor infertility. Shiraz E Med J. 2009; 10(2): 79-83.
28. Burr RW, Siegberg R, Flaherty SP, Wang XJ, Matthews CD. The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65(1): 127-132.