Neural correlates of changing intention in the human FEF and IPS

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 859-867

  Astle, Duncan E ^a,b   Nixon, Elena ^c   Jackson, Stephen R ^c,d   Jackson, Georgina M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Event related potentials; Executive control; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; HUMAN; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SACCADES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855860360     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00604.2011     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allport A, Styles EA, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Attention and Performance XV, edited by Umilta C and Moscovitch M. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994, p. 421-452.
2. Asari T, Konishi S, Jimura K, Miyashita Y. Multiple components of lateral posterior parietal activation associated with cognitive set shifting. Neuroimage 26: 694-702, 2005.
3. Astle DE, Jackson GM, Swainson R. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task-set: a dense-sensor ERP study. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 255-267, 2008a.
4. Astle DE, Jackson GM, Swainson R. The role of spatial information in advance task-set control: an event-related potential study. Eur J Neurosci 28: 1404-1418, 2008b.
5. Astle DE, Nobre AC, Scerif G. Applying an attentional set to perceived and remembered features. PLoS One 4: e7613, 2009.
6. Brass M, von Cramon DY. Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 609-620, 2004.
7. Connolly JD, Goodale MA, Goltz HC, Munoz DP. fMRI activation in the human frontal eye field is correlated with saccadic reaction time. J Neurophysiol 94: 605-611, 2005.
8. Connolly JD, Goodale MA, Menon RS, Munoz DP. Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set. Nat Neurosci 5: 1345-1352, 2002.
9. Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, Drury HA, Linenweber MR, Petersen SE, Raichle ME, Van Essen DC. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21: 761-773, 1998.
10. De Jong R. An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In: Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII, edited by Monsell S and Driver J. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000, p. 357-376.
11. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18: 193-222, 1995.
12. Duncan J, Emslie H, Williams P, Johnson R, Freer C. Intelligence and the frontal lobe: the organization of goal-directed behavior. Cogn Psychol 30: 257-303, 1996.
13. Ettinger U, Ffytche DH, Kumari V, Kathmann N, Reuter B, Zelaya F, Williams SC. Decomposing the neural correlates of antisaccade eye-movements using event-related fMRI. Cereb Cortex 18: 1147-1159, 2008.
14. Evarts E, Shinoda Y, Wise S. Neurophysiological Approaches to Higher Brain Functions. New York: Wiley, 1984.
15. Everling S, Munoz DP. Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. J Neurosci 20: 387-400, 2000.
16. Ferree TC, Luu P, Russell GS, Tucker DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 536-544, 2001.
17. Friston K, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Trujillo-Barreto N, Henson R, Flandin G, Mattout J. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 39: 1104-1120, 2008.
18. Hillyard SA, Munte TF. Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials. Percept Psychophys 36: 185-198, 1984.
19. Husain M, Parton A, Hodgson TL, Mort D, Rees G. Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field. Nat Neurosci 6: 117-118, 2003.
20. Kimberg DY, Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M. Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study. Brain Res 10: 189-196, 2000.
21. Lavric A, Mizon GA, Monsell S. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation. Eur J Neurosci 28: 1016-1029, 2008.
22. Logan GD, Bundesen C. Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29: 575-599, 2003.
23. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 19: 1233-1239, 2003.
24. Monsell S, Mizon GA. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 493-516, 2006.
25. Moon SY, Barton JJ, Mikulski S, Polli FE, Cain MS, Vangel M, Hämäläinen MS, Manoach DS. Where left becomes right: a magnetoencephalographic study of sensorimotor transformation for antisaccades. Neuroimage 36: 1313-1323, 2007.
26. Mueller SC, Swainson R, Jackson GM. ERP indices of persisting and current inhibitory control: a study of saccadic task switching. Neuroimage 45: 191-197, 2009.
27. Nicholson R, Karayanidis F, Poboka D, Heathcote A, Michie PT. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology 42: 540-554, 2005.
28. O'Driscoll GA, Alpert NM, Matthysse SW, Levy DL, Rauch SL, Holzman PS. Functional neuroanatomy of antisaccade eye movements investigated with positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 925-929, 1995.
29. Offen S, Gardner JL, Schluppeck D, Heeger DJ. Differential roles for frontal eye fields (FEFs) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in visual working memory and visual attention. J Vis 10: 28, 2010.
30. Paus T. Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: a selective review. Neuropsychologia 34: 475-483, 1996.
31. Prime SL, Vesia M, Crawford JD. TMS over human frontal eye fields disrupts trans-saccadic memory of multiple objects. Cereb Cortex 20: 759-772, 2010.
32. Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124: 207-231, 1995.
33. Rushworth MF, Hadland KA, Paus T, Sipila PK. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. J Neurophysiol 87: 2577-2592, 2002a.
34. Rushworth MF, Passingham RE, Nobre AC. Components of switching intentional set. J Cogn Neurosci 14: 1139-1150, 2002b.
35. Schwartz S, Vuilleumier P, Hutton C, Maravita A, Dolan RJ, Driver J. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cereb Cortex 15: 770-786, 2005.
36. Smith DT, Jackson SR, Rorden C. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention. Brain Stimul 2: 81-87, 2009.
37. Smith DT, Jackson SR, Rorden C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues. Neuropsychologia 43: 1288-1296, 2006.
38. Smith DT, Rorden C, Jackson SR. Exogenous orienting of attention depends upon the ability to execute eye movements. Curr Biol 14: 792-795, 2004.
39. Taylor PC, Nobre AC, Rushworth MF. FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity. Cereb Cortex 17: 391-399, 2007.
40. Tucker DM, Liotti M, Potts GF, Russell GS, Posner MI. Spatiotemporal analysis of brain electrical fields. Hum Brain Mapp 1: 134-152, 1994.
41. Wager TD, Jonides J, Reading S. Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 22: 1679-1693, 2004.
42. Wylie GR, Murray MM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 105-118, 2009.
43. Xu Y, Chun MM. Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual shortterm memory for objects. Nature 440: 91-95, 2006.
44. Yamada M, Pita MC, Iijima T, Tsutsui K. Rule-dependent anticipatory activity in prefrontal neurons. Neurosci Res 67: 162-171, 2010.