Response - Single-sex education: Parameters too narrow

Science

Volumn 335, Issue 6065, 2012, Pages 166-168

  Halpern, Diane F ^a   Eliot, Lise ^b   Bigler, Rebecca S ^c   Fabes, Richard A ^d   Hanish, Laura D ^d   Hyde, Janet ^e   Liben, Lynn S ^f   Martin, Carol Lynn ^d  

^a CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^f PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXISM; SEXUAL EDUCATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 84855856934     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.335.6065.166-c     Document Type: Letter

References (21)

1. U.S. Department of Education, "Single-sex versus coeducational schooling: A systematic review" (Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2005).
2. C. Riordan, Am. J. Ed. 93, 518 (1985).
3. S. J. Gibb, D. M. Fergusson, L. J. Horwood, Aust. J. Ed. 52, 301 (2008).
4. S. E. Taylor et al., Psychol. Rev. 107, 411 (2001).
5. D. S. Jessop, J. M. Turner-Cobb, Stress, 11, 1 (2008).
6. J. Strahler, A. Mueller, F. Rosenloecher, C. Kirschbaum, N. Rohleder, Psychophysiology 47, 587 (2010).
7. Y. Fukuba et al., J. Phys. Anthropol. 28, 269 (2009).
8. E. Weil, The New York Times Magazine, 2 March 2008, p. 38.
9. M. J. Prinstein, K. A. Dodge, Understanding Peer Infl uence in Children and Adolescents (Guilford, New York, 2008).
10. T. F. Pettigrew, L. R. Tropp, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 751 (2006).
11. R. Faris, D. Felmlee, Am. Sociol. Rev. 76, 48 (2011).
12. V. Lavy, A. Schlosser, NBER Working Paper No. 13292 (August 2007).
13. V. E. Lee, H. M. Marks, T. Byrd, Sociol. Ed. 67, 92 (1994).
14. M. Killen, A. Rutland, M. D. Ruck, "Promoting equity, tolerance, and justice in childhood" (Society for Research in Child Development, Social Policy Report, Volume 25, Number 4, Ann Arbor, MI, 2011).
15. H. Park, J. Behrman, "Causal effects of single-sex schools on college attendance: Random assignment in Korean high schools" (PSC Working Paper Series 10-01, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 2010).
16. S. Han, T.-H. Kim, B. Seo, "The effects of high school features on high track students' academic achievement in Korea" (2011); www.econ.hokudai.ac.jp/~kinkei/ HahnNo4.pdf.
17. C. K. Jackson, J. Public Econ. 96, 173 (2012).
18. A. Datnow, L. Hubbard, E. Woody, "Is single-gender learning viable in the public sector? Lessons from California's pilot program" (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, 2001); http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ ED471051.pdf.
19. D. Leonard, "Single-sex and coeducational secondary schooling: Life course consequences?" [Economic and Social Research Centre (ESRC) Report (RES-000-22-1085 ESRC), Swindon, UK, 2007].
20. M. Hewstone, M. Rubin, H. Willis, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 575 (2002).
21. B. Mintz, D. H. Krymkowski, Sociol. Quart. 51, 20 (2010).