Neuropsychological behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral approach system (BAS) assessment: A shortened sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire version (SPSRQ-20)

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 628-636

  Aluja, Anton ^a   Blanch, Angel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CHILD; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LANGUAGE; MALE; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; PUNISHMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REWARD; SPAIN; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; PUNISHMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REWARD; SPAIN; TRANSLATING;

EID: 84855821809     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2011.608760     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aluja, A.,&Blanch, A. (2007). Comparison of impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy (I7) structure in English and Spanish samples: Analysis of different structural equation models. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2294-2305.
2. Aluja, A., del Barrio, M., & García, L. F. (2006). Comparison of several shortened versions of the EMBU: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 23-31. (Pubitemid 43428027)
3. Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2003a). A psychometric analysis of the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire short scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 449-460. (Pubitemid 37244264)
4. Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2003b). Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire (ZKPQ-III-R): A study of a shortened form. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1083-1097. (Pubitemid 36412467)
5. Aluja, A., García, O., Rossier, J., & García, L. F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of theNEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591-604. (Pubitemid 40019369)
6. Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): A factor/ facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(5), 1-17.
7. Aluja, A., Rossier, J., García, L. F, Angleitner, A., Kuhlman, D. M., & Zuckerman, M. (2006). A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-cc) adapted to English, French, German and Spanish languages. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 619-628. (Pubitemid 44028713)
8. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0. Spring House, PA: AMOS Development Corporation SPSS, Inc.
9. Avila, C., & Torrubia, R. (2008). Performance and conditioning studies. In P. J. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 228-260). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Ball, S., & Zuckerman, M. (1990). Sensation seeking, Eysenck's personality dimensions and reinforcement sensitivity in concept formation. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 343-355.
11. Barratt, E. S. (1985). Impulsiveness subtraits: Arousal and information processing. In J. T. Spence & C. E. Itard (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and personality (pp. 137-146). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
12. Beauducel, A., Kersting, M., & Liepmann, D. (2005). A multitrait-multimethod model for the measurement of sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 168-175.
13. Blalock, H. (1972). Social statistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
14. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
15. Byrne, B. M. (1991). The Maslach Burnout Inventory:Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 583-605.
16. Byrne, B. M. (1993). The Maslach Burnout Inventory:Validating factorial structure and invariance across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 197-213.
17. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Caci, H., Deschaux, O., & Bayle, F. J. (2006). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the BIS/BAS scales and the SPSRQ. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 987-998.
19. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
20. Cogswell, A., Alloy, L. B., van Dulmen, M. H. M., & Fresco, D. M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1649-1658. (Pubitemid 44334724)
21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Corr, P. J. (2002). J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511-532.
23. Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317-332. (Pubitemid 38844379)
24. Corr, P. J. (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
26. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1999). NEO PI-RManual: NEO PI-R, Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado. NEO-FFI, Inventario NEO reducido de Cinco Factores. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.
27. Cudeck, R., & Browne, M.W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
28. del Barrio, V., Aluja, A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Anger assessment with the STAXI-CA: Psychometric properties of a new instrument for children and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 227-244. (Pubitemid 38808631)
29. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
30. Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Impulsineness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological Reports, 43, 1247-1255.
31. Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, F. J. (1985).Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613-619.
32. Feldt, L. S. (1980). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha coefficient is the same for two tests administered to the same sample. Psychometrika, 49, 99-105.
33. Gomez, R., & Gomez, A. (2005). Convergent, discriminant and concurrent validities of measures of the behavioral approach and behavioral inhibition systems: Confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 87-102. (Pubitemid 39483245)
34. Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion- extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249-266.
35. Gray, J.A. (1981).Acritique of Eysenck's theory of personality. InH. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model of personality (pp. 246-276). New York, NY: Springer.
36. Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
38. Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186-207.
39. Lardi, C., Billieux, J., d'Acremont,M., & Van der Linden, M. (2008). A French adaptation of a short version of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 722-725.
40. Lautenschlager, G. J. (1989). ALPHATST: Testing for differences in values of coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 284.
41. Leue, A., & Beauducel, A. (2008). A meta-analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory: On performance parameters in reinforcement tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 353-369.
42. Levy, P. (1967). The correction for spurious correlation in the evaluation of short-form tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 84-86.
43. Liepmann, D., Nettelnstroth, W., Tartler, K., & Smolka, S. (2005). START-E: Eine Testbatterie im Bereich der Personalarbeit [START-E: A test battery for personnel psychology]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
44. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38(1), 88-91. Retrieved from http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/. (Pubitemid 44945603)
45. Luengo, M. A., Carrillo-De-La-Peña,M. T., & Otero, J. M. (1991). The components of impulsiveness: A comparison of the I7 impulsiveness questionnaire and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 657-667.
46. O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396-402.
47. O'Connor, R. M., Colder, C. R., & Hawk, L.W., Jr. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 985-1002. (Pubitemid 39145794)
48. Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (2001). Dopamine, appetitive reinforcement and the neuropsychology of human learning: An individual differences approach. In A. Eliasz & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Advances in individual differences research (pp. 113-149). Lengerich, Germany: PABST Science Publishers.
49. Sava, F. A., & Sperneac, A. M. (2006). Sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment rating scales: A validation study on the Romanian population. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1445-1456. (Pubitemid 44391093)
50. SPSS 15.0. (2006). Command Syntax Reference. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
51. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
52. Torrubia, E., ávila, C., & Caseras, X. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity scales. In P. J. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 188-227). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Moltó, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837-862. (Pubitemid 33382526)
54. Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Moltó, J., & Grande, I. (1995). Testing for stress and happiness: The role of the behavioral inhibition system. InC.D. Spielberger, I.
55. G. Sarason, J. Brebner, E. Greenglass, P. Langani, & A. M. O'Roark (Eds.), Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger, and curiosity (Vol. 15, pp. 189-211). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
56. Torrubia, R., & Tobeña, A. (1984). A scale for the assessment of susceptibility to punishment as a measure of anxiety: Preliminary results. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 371-375.
57. Wilson, G. D., Barreto, P. T., & Gray, J. A. (1989). Human reactions to reward and punishment: A questionnaire examination of Gray's personality theory. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 509-515.
58. Yadama,G. N.,&Drake, B. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Social Work Research, 19, 184-193.
59. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139-149. (Pubitemid 8298851)
60. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Teta, P., Joireman, J., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models of personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768 .