Split skin graft application over an integrating, biodegradable temporizing polymer matrix: Immediate and delayed

Journal of Burn Care and Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-19

  Greenwood, John Edward ^a   Dearman, Bronwyn Louise ^a  

^a ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYMER; POLYURETHAN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; BURN; NONHUMAN; PILOT STUDY; SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ANIMALS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DEBRIDEMENT; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYMERS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REGENERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SUS SCROFA; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84855808903     PISSN: 1559047X     EISSN: 15590488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182372be9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Huang KF, Linares HA, Evans HJ. Can donor sites be harvested indefinitely? Proc Am Burns Assoc 1992;24.
2. Valero J, Comellas M, Alvarez A, Badran J, Vazquez Barro A, Moledo E. Treatment of donor sites of skin grafts of partial thickness with hydrocolloid dressings. Ann MBC 1991;4: 234.
3. Solanki NS, Greenwood JE, Mackie IP, Kavanagh S, Penhall R. Social issues prolong elderly burn patient hospitalization. J Burn Care Res 2011;32:387-91.
4. Greenwood J, Amjadi M, Dearman B, Mackie I. Real-time demonstration of split skin graft inosculation and Integra dermal matrix neovascularisation using confocal laser scanning microscopy. ePlasty 2009;9:309-18.
5. Schneider J, Biedermann T, Widmer D, et al. Matriderm versus Integra: a comparative experimental study. Burns 2009;35:51-7.
6. Ryssel H, Gazyakan E, Germann G, Ohlbauer M. The use of Matriderm in early excision and simultaneous autologous skin grafting in burns-a pilot study. Burns 2008;34:93-7.
7. McGregor A, McGregor I. Fundamental techniques of plastic surgery. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.
8. Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996;17:124-36.
9. Munster AM, Smith-Meek M, Shalom A. Acellular allograft dermal matrix: immediate or delayed epidermal coverage? Burns 2001;27:150-3. (Pubitemid 32156988)
10. Walden JL, Garcia H, Hawkins H, Crouchet JR, Traber L, Gore D. Both dermal matrix and epidermis contribute to an inhibition of wound contraction. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:162-6. (Pubitemid 30626236)
11. Druecke D, Lamme EN, Hermann S, et al. Modulation of scar tissue formation using different dermal regeneration templates in the treatment of experimental full-thickness wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:518-27. (Pubitemid 39314334)
12. Truong AT, Kowal-Vern A, Latenser BA, Wiley DE, Walter RJ. Comparison of dermal substitutes in wound healing utilizing a nude mouse model. J Burns Wounds 2005;4:e4.
13. Li A, Dearman BL, Crompton KE, Moore TG, Greenwood JE. Evaluation of a novel biodegradable polymer for the creation of a dermal matrix. J Burn Care Res 2009;30:717-28.
14. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 2004;11:36-42.
15. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:66-76. (Pubitemid 32463294)
16. Son D, Jeong H, Choi T, Kim J, Han K. A new mechanism associated with composite graft success. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1900-9.
17. Bargues L, Boyer S, Leclerc T, Duhamel P, Bey E. Incidence and microbiology of infectious complications with the use of artificial skin Integra in burns. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2009; 54:533-9.
18. Van Dorp AG, Verhoeven MC, Koerten HK, Van Der Nat- Van Der Meij TH, Van Blitterswijk CA, Ponec M. Dermal regeneration in full-thickness wounds in Yucatan miniature pigs using a biodegradable copolymer. Wound Repair Regen 1998;6:556-68. (Pubitemid 128659203)
19. Mensik I, Lamme EN, Riesle J, Brychta P. Effectiveness and safety of PEGT/PBT copolymer scaffold as dermal substitute in scar reconstruction wounds (feasibility trial). Cell Tissue Bank 2002;3:245-53. (Pubitemid 36950120)