Heterogeneity of the digestible insoluble fiber of selected forages in situ

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 171, Issue 2-4, 2012, Pages 154-166

  Vieira, Ricardo Augusto Mendonça ^a   Campos, Patrícia Regina de Souza Siqueira ^a   Silva, José Fernando Coelho da ^a   Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo ^b   Tamy, Wagner Pessanha ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE FLUMINENSE DARCY RIBEIRO   (Brazil)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compartmental models; Digestion kinetics; NDFom; Ruminants

Indexed keywords

BOVIDAE; MEDICAGO SATIVA; POACEAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84855802250     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19:716-723.
2. Akin D.E., Amos H.E. Rumen bacterial degradation of forage cell walls investigated by electron microscopy. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 29:692-701.
3. Akin D.E., Burdick D., Michaels G.E. Rumen bacterial interrelationships with plant tissue during degradation revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Microbiol. 1974, 27:1149-1156.
4. Akin D.E., Rigsby L.L. Degradation of bermuda and orchard grass by species of ruminal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50:825-830.
5. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 1990, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington. 15th ed.
6. Bard Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation 1974, Academic Press, Inc., New York.
7. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 2004, 33:261-304.
8. Campos, P.R.S.S., 2010. Evaluation of the in situ method and determination of the ruminal degradation kinetics of tropical forages. D.Sc. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil, 79 pp. (in Portuguese).
9. Casali A.O., Detmann E., Valadares Filho S.C., Pereira J.C., Henriques L.T., Freitas S.G., Paulino M.F. Influence of incubation time and particle size over the content of indigestible compounds of feed and bovine feces obtained by in situ procedures. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 2008, 37:335-342. (in Portuguese).
10. Chandler J.A., Jewel W.J., Gossett J.M., Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. Predicting methane fermentation biodegradability. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1980, 10:93-107.
11. Cheng K.J., Fay J.P., Howarth R.E., Costerton J.W. Sequence of events in the digestion of fresh legume leaves by rumen bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 40:613-625.
12. Dehority B.A., Johnson R.R. Effect of particle size upon the in vitro cellulose digestibility of forages by rumen bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 1961, 44:2242-2249.
13. Ellis W.C., Mahlooji M., Matis J.H. Models for estimating parameters of neutral detergent fiber digestion by ruminal microorganisms. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 83:1591-1601.
14. Hastert A.A., Owensby C.E., Harbers L.H. Rumen microbial degradation of indiangrass and big bluestem leaf blades. J. Anim. Sci. 1983, 57:1626-1636.
15. Huhtanen P., Asikainen U., Arkkila M., Jaakkola S. Cell wall digestion and passage kinetics estimated by marker and in situ methods or by rumen evacuations in cattle fed hay 2 or 18 times daily. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 133:206-227.
16. Huhtanen P., Jaakkola S., Kukkonen U. Ruminal plant cell wall digestibility estimated from digestion and passage kinetics utilizing mathematical models. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1995, 52:159-173.
17. Huhtanen P., Nousiainen J., Rinne M. Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agric. Food Sci. 2006, 15:293-323.
18. Huntington J.A., Givens D.I. The in situ technique for studying the rumen degradation of feeds: a review of the procedure. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. B 1995, 65:63-93.
19. Lindberg J.E. Estimation of rumen degradability of feed proteins with the in sacco technique and various in vitro methods: a review. Acta Agric. Scand. Suppl. 1985, 25:64-97.
20. Littell R.C., Henry P.R., Ammerman C.B. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76:1216-1231.
21. ® for Mixed Models 2006, SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
22. Matis J.H., Wehrly T.E., Ellis W.C. Some generalized stochastic compartment models for digesta flow. Biometrics 1989, 45:703720.
23. Mertens D.R. Dietary fiber components: relationship to the rate and extent of ruminal digestion. Fed. Proc. 1977, 36:182-192.
24. Mertens D.R. Rate and extent of digestion. Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism 2005, 13-48. CAB International, Wallingford. J. Dijkstra, J.M. Forbes, J. France (Eds.).
25. Mertens D.R., Loften J.R. The effect of starch on forage fiber digestion kinetics in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 1980, 63:1437-1446.
26. Motulsky H.J., Cristopoulos A. Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression. A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting 2003, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego. http://www.graphpad.com/.
27. Nocek J.E. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71:2051-2069.
28. Nocek J.E., English J.E. In situ degradation kinetics: evaluation of rate determination procedure. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69:77-87.
29. Raftery A.E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol. Methodol. 1995, 25:111-163.
30. Robinson P.H., Fadel J.G., Tamminga S. Evaluation of mathematical models to describe neutral detergent residue in terms of its susceptibility to degradation in the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1986, 15:249-271.
31. Russell J.B. Rumen Microbiology and its Role in Ruminant Nutrition 2002, James B. Russell©, Ithaca.
32. Thiex N.J., Anderson S., Gildemeister B. Crude fat, hexanes extraction, in feed, cereal grain, and forage (Randall/Soxtec/submersion method): collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 2003, 86:899-908.
33. Traxler M.J., Fox D.G., Van Soest P.J., Pell A.N., Lascano C.E., Lanna D.P.D., Moore J.E., Lana R.P., Vélez M., Flores A. Predicting forage indigestible NDF from lignin concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76:1469-1480.
34. van Milgen J., Berger L.L., Murphy M.R. Fractionation of substrate as an intrinsic characteristic of feedstuffs fed to ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:124-131.
35. van Milgen J., Berger L.L., Murphy M.R. Digestion kinetics of alfalfa and wheat straw assuming heterogeneity of the potentially digestible fraction. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71:1917-1923.
36. van Milgen J., Murphy M.R., Berger L.L. A compartmental model to analyze ruminal digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:2515-2529.
37. van Milgen J., Rioach M.L., Berger L.L., Murphy M.R., Moore D.M. Technical note: mineral deposits on Dacron bags during ruminal incubation. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70:2551-2555.
38. Van Soest P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant 1994, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 2nd ed.
39. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:3583-3597.
40. Van Soest P.J., Van Amburgh M.E., Robertson J.B., Knaus W.F. Validation of the 2.4 times lignin factor for ultimate extent of NDF digestion, and curve peeling rate of fermentation curves into pools. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. 2005, 139-149. Cornell University, Syracuse.
41. Vieira R.A.M., Tedeschi L.O., Cannas A. A generalized compartmental model to estimate the fibre mass in the ruminoreticulum: 1. Estimating parameters of digestion. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 255:345-356.
42. Waldo D.R., Smith L.W., Cox E.L. Model of cellulose disappearance from the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 1972, 55:125-129.
43. Wilson J.R. Organization of forage plant tissues. Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility 1993, 1-32. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison. H.G. Jung, D.R. Buxton, R.D. Hatfield, J. Ralph (Eds.).