Do Gastroenterologists Adhere to Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines for Celiac Disease?

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2012, Pages e12-e20

  Parakkal, Deepak ^a   Du, Hongyan ^a   Semer, Rumi ^b   Ehrenpreis, Eli Daniel ^b   Guandalini, Stefano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Celiac disease; Clinical decision making; Gluten challenge; Guidelines; Medical decision analysis

Indexed keywords

GLIADIN ANTIBODY; HLA DQ2 ANTIGEN; HLA DQ8 ANTIGEN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN A;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELIAC DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATITIS HERPETIFORMIS; DOWN SYNDROME; DUODENUM BIOPSY; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GLUTEN FREE DIET; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEROLOGY; TURNER SYNDROME;

ADULT; CELIAC DISEASE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84855796451     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: 15392031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f0da0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T. Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:286-292
2. Murray JA, Van Dyke C, Plevak MF, et al. Trends in the identification and clinical features of celiac disease in a North American community, 1950 to 2001. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:19-27
3. Talley NJ, Valdovinos M, Petterson TM, et al. Epidemiology of celiac sprue: a community-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:843-846
4. Hin H, Bird G, Fisher P, et al. Coeliac Disease in primary care: case finding study. BMJ. 1999;318:164-167
5. Green PHR, Stavropoulos SN, Panagi SG, et al. Characteristics of adult celiac disease in the USA: results of a national survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:126-131
6. Davidson AG, Hassall EG. Screening for celiac disease. CMAJ. 1997;157:547-548
7. Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Shekelle PG. Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:281-295
8. Green PH, Neugut AI, Naiyer AJ, et al. Economic benefits of increased diagnosis of celiac disease in a national managed care population in the United States. J Insur Med. 2008;40:218-228
9. Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. AGA Institute medical position statement on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1977-1980
10. Hill ID, Dirks MH, Liptak GS, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: recommendations of the North American society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition. J Pediatric Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40:1-19
11. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2004;21:1-23 PMID: 17308551
12. Rostom A, Dubé C, Cranney A, et al. Celiac Disease Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 104(Prepared by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No 290-02-0021) AHRQ Publication No 04-E029-1. 2004 Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
13. Bai J, Zeballos E, Fried M, et al. WGO-OMGE practice guideline: celiac disease. World GE News. 2005;10:1-8
14. Walker-Smith J, Murch S. Diseases of the Small Intestine in Childhood. 4th ed. Oxford: Isis Medical Media Ltd; 1999;258-9.
15. Fasano A, Araya M, Bhatnagar S, et al. Federation of International Societies of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition consensus report on celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47:214-219
16. Richey R, Howdle P, Shaw E, et al. Recognition and assessment of coeliac disease in children and adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2009;338:b1684 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1684
17. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar M, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. 2001 Santa Monica The RAND Corporation
18. Spiegel BM, Ho W, Esrailian E, et al. Controversies in ulcerative colitis: a survey comparing decision making of experts versus community gastroenterologists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:168-174 174.e1. Epub 2008 Sep 4
19. Spiegel BM, Ho W, Esrailian E, et al. Controversies in ulcerative colitis: a survey comparing decision making of experts versus community gastroenterologists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:168-174 174.e1. Epub 2008 Sep 4
20. Esrailian E, Spiegel BMR, Targownik L, et al. Differences in the management of Crohn’s disease among experts and community providers, based on a national survey of sample case vignettes. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1005-1018
21. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743-1748
22. Wennberg JE. Practice variations and health care reform: connecting the dots. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 (Suppl Web Exclusive:VAR140-VAR144) PMID:15471778
23. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:771-780
24. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715-1722
25. Burke CA, Sastri SV, Jacobsen G, et al. Gender disparity in the practice of gastroenterology: the first 5 years of a career. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:259-264
26. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129-1136
27. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5:e17 Epub 2003 Aug 29