Energy and environmental balance of biogas for dual-fuel mobile applications

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1745-1753

  Lacour, S ^a   Chinese, T ^a   Alkadee, D ^b   Perilhon, C ^b   Descombes, G ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Laboratoire de Genie des Procedes Pour l'Environnement l'Energie et la Sante (LGP2ES EA21)   (France)

Author keywords

Agriculturalwaste treatment; Biofuel; Biogas; Carbon balance; Energy balance; Energy production; LCA

Indexed keywords

A-CARBON; AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT; AGRICULTURAL MACHINE; BIO-MASS ENERGY; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOGAS PLANTS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CARBON BALANCE; DUAL-FUELS; ENERGY DEMANDS; ENERGY INDICATOR; ENERGY NEEDS; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL BALANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; GREEN ELECTRICITY; KEYPOINTS; LCA; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; METHANE EMISSIONS; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; POLLUTANT EMISSION; POWER SUPPLY; PRODUCTION PROCESS; ROAD VEHICLES; SUBSTITUTION RATES; TRANSPORT ACTIVITY; TRANSPORTATION NEEDS;

AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DIESEL ENGINES; DUAL FUEL ENGINES; ENERGY BALANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE; METHANE;

BIOGAS;

EID: 84855772870     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.029     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Chang J, Fontenelle J, Serveau N. Inventaires des émissions polluantes atmosphériques en France, séries sectorielles et analyses et étendues, Tech. rep., CITEPA, Paris; février 2007.
2. Couturier C, Bochu J, Pointereau P, Doublet S. Plan Climat 2003, Groupe Agriculture, Forêts, Produits dérivés, 12 propositions pour lutter contre le changement climatique dans le secteur de l'agriculture, Tech. rep., Solagro; Septembre 2003.
3. Lenzen M. Current state of development of electricity generating technologies: a literature review Energies 3 2010 462 591
4. Hartmann JK. Life-cycle-assessment of industrial scale biogas plants, Tech. rep., Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften, Georg-August- Universität, Göttingen; 2006.
5. Borjesson P., and Berglund M. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems - Part 1: Fuel-cycle emissions Biomass and Bioenergy 30 5 2006 469 485
6. Chevalier M., and Meunier F. Environmental assessment of biogas co- or tri-generation units by life cycle analysis methodology Applied Thermal Engineering 25 2005 3025 3041
7. Monier E, Wenish S. Analyses du cycle de vie des modes de valorisation énergétique du biogaz issu de méthanisation de la fraction fermentescible des ordures ménagres collectées sélectivement en France, Tech. rep., Ademe; Septembre 2007.
8. Berglund M., and Borjesson P. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production Biomass and Bioenergy 30 3 2006 254 266 (Pubitemid 43243044)
9. Moras S. Environmental assessment of energy production by combustion of biogas provided by the anaerobic digestion of agricultural biomass International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 9 4 2008 413 424
10. Poitrat E. Elaboration d'un référentiel méthodologique pour la réalisation d'Analyses de Cycle de Vie appliquées aux biocarburants de premire génération en France, Tech. rep., Ademe; Avril 2008.
11. NF-EN-ISO-14044 Environmental management, life cycle assessment: Principles and framework 2006 AFNOR
12. Ademe, Analyses en cycle de vie appliquées aux biocarburants de premire génération consommés en France, Tech. rep., Service bioressources; Fevrier 2010.
13. Samaras Z., and Zierock K. Off-road vehicles - a comparison of emissions with those from road transport Science of the Total Environment 169 1-3 1995 249 255 (Pubitemid 26430524)
14. Lacour S., Galiégue Y., Vaitilingom G., Pradel M., Gallet P., and Guiscafré P. The contribution of field experiments to life cycle assessment of agricultural works: application to spreading works Cemagref Int. Conference on agricultural engineering, towards environmental technologies 2010 Clermont-Ferrand
15. Kalinci Y., Hepbasli A., and Dincer I. Biomass-based hydrogen production: a review and analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 8799 8817
16. Borel L., and Favrat D. Thermodynamique et énergétique: de l'énergie á l'exergie 2005 EPFL-PPUR Lausanne
17. Martinez J, Guiziou F, Gueutier V. Emissions de méthane au cours du stockage des déjections animales, Tech. rep., Division Production et Economie Agricoles, Rennes; 1995.
18. Selim M.Y.E. Effect of engine parameters and gaseous fuel type on the cyclic variability of dual fuel engines Fuel 84 7/8 2005 961 971
19. Sahoo B., Sahoo N., and Saha U. Effect of engine parameters and type of gaseous fuel on the performance of dual-fuel engines - a critical review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 2009 1151 1184
20. Huijbregts M., Rombouts L.J.A., Hellweg S., Frischknecht R., Hendriks A.J., and Meent D. Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environmental Science & Technology 40 3 2006 641 648 (Pubitemid 43222143)
21. Jancovici JM, Bilan Carbone - Guide méthodologique v6.1 - Objectifs et principes de comptabilisation, Tech. rep., ADEME; Juin 2010.
22. Goedkoop M., and Spriensma R The Eco - indicator 99 - a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment - Methodology Report 3rd edition 2001 PRé - Consultant B.V Tech. rep.