Separation of nitrophenols using cellulose acetate nanofiltration membrane: Influence of surfactant additives

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 85, Issue , 2012, Pages 147-156

  Ghaemi, Negin ^a,b   Madaeni, Sayed S ^a   Alizadeh, Abdolhamid ^a   Daraei, Parisa ^a   Zinatizadeh, Ali Akbar ^a   Rahimpour, Farshad ^a  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Additive; Cellulose acetate nanofiltration membrane; Ionic surfactant; Nitrophenols; Non ionic surfactant

Indexed keywords

AFM; CA MEMBRANES; CELLULOSE ACETATES; COAGULATION BATH; FORMAMIDES; FT-IR-ATR; IONIC SURFACTANTS; NITROPHENOLS; P-NITROPHENOL; PHASE INVERSION TECHNIQUES; PURE WATER; SOLUTION PH; SURFACTANT ADDITIVES; TRITON X-100; WATER AND WASTEWATER; WATER CONTACT ANGLE; ZETA POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS;

ADDITIVES; AMIDES; BROMINE COMPOUNDS; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL WATER TREATMENT; COAGULATION; CONTACT ANGLE; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT; NANOFILTRATION; PERMEATION; PHENOLS; SEPARATION; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

EID: 84855758252     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. A.I. Schafer, A.G. Fane, and T.D. Waite Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications first ed. 2005 Elsevier Advanced Technology pp. 5-10
2. R. Haddad, E. Ferjani, M.S. Roudesli, and A. Deratani Properties of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes: application to brackish water desalination Desalination 167 2004 403 409 (Pubitemid 39454716)
3. C. Lv, Y. Su, Y. Wang, X. Ma, Q. Sun, and Z. Jiang Enhanced permeation performance of cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane by incorporation of Pluronic F127 J. Membr. Sci. 294 2007 68 74 (Pubitemid 46550323)
4. G. Arthanareeswaran, P. Thanikaivelan, K. Srinivasn, D. Mohan, and M. Rajendran Synthesis, characterization and thermal studies on cellulose acetate membranes with additive Eur. Polymer J. 40 2004 2153 2159
5. G. Arthanareeswaran, T.K. Sriyamuna Devi, and D. Mohan Development, characterization and separation performance of organic-inorganic membranes part II: effect of additives Sep. Purif. Technol. 67 2009 271 281
6. M. Sivakumar, D.R. Mohan, and R. Rangarajan Studies on cellulose acetate-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes II: effect of additive concentration J. Membr. Sci. 268 2006 208 219 (Pubitemid 41828010)
7. E. Saljoughi, and T. Mohammadi Cellulose acetate (CA)/ polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) blend asymmetric membranes: Preparation, morphology and performance Desalination 249 2009 850 854
8. M. Sivakumar, R. Malaisamy, C.J. Sajitha, D. Mohan, and V. Mohan Preparation and performance of CA-polyurethane blend membrane and their applications II J. Membr. Sci. 169 2000 215
9. A. Yamasaki, R.K. Tyagi, A.E. Fouda, K. Jonnason, and T. Matsuura Effect of SDS surfactant as an additive on the formation of asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation I. Pinnau, B.D. Freeman, Membrane Formation and Modification 2000 ACS Washington DC, USA pp. 87-95
10. A.M. Alsari, K.C. Khulbe, and T. Matsuura The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions as gelation media on the formation of PES membranes J. Membr. Sci. 188 2001 279 293 (Pubitemid 32463850)
11. H.A. Tsai, L.D. Li, K.R. Lee, Y.C. Wang, C.L. Li, J. Huang, and J.Y. Lai Effect of surfactant addition on the morphology and pervaporation performance of asymmetric polysulfone membranes J. Membr. Sci. 176 2000 97 103 (Pubitemid 30407226)
12. Y. Mansourpanah, S.S. Madaeni, and A. Rahimpour Fabrication and development of interfacial polymerized thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane using different surfactants in organic phase; study of morphology and performance J. Membr. Sci. 343 2009 219 228
13. A. Rahimpour, S.S. Madaeni, and Y. Mansourpanah The effect of anionic, non-ionic and cationic surfactants on morphology and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for milk concentration J. Membr. Sci. 296 2007 110 121 (Pubitemid 46678634)
14. D. Grosjean Atmospheric chemistry of toxic contaminants; Reaction rates and atmospheric persistence J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 40 1990 1397 1402 (Pubitemid 20354703)
15. J.C. Spain, J.B. Hughes, and H.J. Knackmuss Biodegradation of Nitroaromatic Compounds and Explosives 2000 Lewis Publishers New York
16. W.J. Rea, H.C. Liang, Effects of pesticides on the immune system, Environmental Health Center, Dallas, TX, USA, 1986, http://www.aehf.com/ articles/A51.htm.
17. A.I. Schafer Natural Organics Removal using membranes, Principle, Performance and Cost 2001 Technomic Publishing Company Inc. Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
18. Y. Kiso, T. Kon, T. Kitao, and K. Nishimura Rejection properties of alkyl phthalates with nanofiltration membranes J. Membr. Sci. 182 2001 205 214 (Pubitemid 32101393)
19. Y. Kiso, Y. Sugiura, T. Kitao, and K. Nishimura Effects of hydrophobicity and molecular size on rejection of aromatic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes J. Membr. Sci. 192 2001 1 10 (Pubitemid 32761675)
20. S.S. Chen, J.S. Taylor, L.A. Mulford, and C.D. Norris Influences of molecular weight, molecular size, flux, and recovery for aromatic pesticide removal by nanofiltration membranes Desalination 160 2004 103 111 (Pubitemid 38215720)
21. A.L. Ahmad, L.S. Tan, and S.R. Abd. Shukor The role of pH in nanofiltration of atrazine and dimethoate from aqueous solution J. Hazard. Mater. 154 2008 633 638 (Pubitemid 351626373)
22. F.J. Benitez, J.L. Acero, F.J. Real, and C. Garcia Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes Water Res. 2008 1 10
23. K.V. Plakas, and A.J. Karabelas Membrane retention of herbicides from single and multi-solute media: the effect of ionic environment J. Membr. Sci. 320 2008 325 334
24. 2 photo-catalyst: Performance, characterization and fouling-resistant capability J. Membr. Sci. 330 2009 297 306
25. K. Kimura, G. Amy, J. Drewes, and Y. Watanabe Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes: an artifact leading to overestimation of rejection J. Membr. Sci. 221 2003 89 101 (Pubitemid 36961447)
26. B. Van der Bruggen, J. Schaep, D. Wilms, and C. Vandecasteele Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration J. Membr. Sci. 156 1999 29 41 (Pubitemid 29122042)
27. D.M. Wang, F.C. Lin, T.T. Wu, and J.Y. Lai Formation mechanism of the macrovoids induced by surfactant additives J. Membr. Sci. 142 1998 191 204
28. A.F. Ismail, and A.R. Hassan Effect of additive contents on the performances and structural properties of asymmetric polyethersulfone (PES) nanofiltration membranes Sep. Purif. Technol. 55 2007 98 109 (Pubitemid 46497866)
29. W. Su-Hu, D. Bing-zhi, and H. Yu Adsorption of bisphenol A by polysulphone membrane Desalination 253 2010 22 29
30. A.R.D. Verliefde, E.R. Cornelissen, S.G.J. Heijman, J.Q.J.C. Verberk, G.L. Amy, B. Van der Bruggen, and J.C. van Dijk The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration J. Membr. Sci. 322 2008 52 66
31. L.D. Nghiem, and A.I. Schäfer Critical risk points of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes in water recycling applications Desalination 187 2006 303 312 (Pubitemid 43137458)
32. N. Ghaemi, S.S. Madaeni, M. De Nobili, and A. Alizadeh Ultrafiltration behavior of nitrophenols in the presence of humic substances J. Membr. Sci. 331 2009 126 136