Having 'need' and Needing 'Have'

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 120-132

  Harves, Stephanie ^a   Kayne, Richard S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Be languages; Have languages; Incorporation; Possession; Transitive 'need'

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855750453     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 15309150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00076     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Boneh, Nora. 2002. The grammar of the possession link: Modern Hebrew yeS constructions. In Proceedings of ConSOLE 9, ed. by Marjo van Koppen, Erica Thrift, Jan van der Torre, and Malte Zimmerman, 1-13. Leiden: University of Leiden, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics (HIL).
3. Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68:553-595.
4. Hale, Ken, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Ken Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 53-109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Hale, Ken, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Harley, Heidi. 2004. Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998. Linguistic Inquiry 35:255-267.
7. Harves, Stephanie. 2008. Intensional transitives and silent HAVE: Distinguishing between want and need. In WCCFL 27: Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, 211-219. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
8. Isaenko, Alexander V. 1974. On 'HAVE' and 'BE' languages (A typological sketch). In Slavic forum: Essays in linguistics and literature, ed. by Michael Flier, 43-77. The Hague: Mouton.
9. Kayne, Richard S. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47:3-31.
10. Kayne, Richard S. 2007. Some English (and Romance) auxiliaries. Paper presented at XVII Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Girona.
11. Larson, Richard S., Marcel den Dikken, and Peter Ludlow. 1997. Intensional transitive verbs and abstract clausal complementation. Ms., SUNY at Stony Brook and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
12. Lechner, Winfried. 2007. Interpretive effects of head movement. Ms., University of Tübingen. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz.
13. MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. McCawley, James. 1974. On identifying the remains of deceased clauses. Language Research 9:73-85.
15. Noonan, Máire. 1993. Statives, perfectives and accusativity: The importance of being HAVE. In Proceedings of the Eleventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Jonathan Mead, 354-370. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
16. Pylkkänen, Liina. 1998. The 'be' of possession in Finnish. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
17. Schwarz, Florian. 2006. On needing propositions and looking for properties. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XVI, ed. by Masayuki Gibson and Jonathan Howell, 259-276. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
18. Stassen, Leon. 2009. Predicative possession. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Sugisaki, Koji. 2009. On children's NEEDs. In The proceedings of the Seventh GLOW in Asia, ed. by Rajat Mohanty and Mythili Menon, 225-236. Hyderabad: EFL University Press.
20. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In The syntactic structure of Hungarian, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer and Katalin É. Kiss, 179-274. Syntax and Semantics 27. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.