Both left and right posterior parietal activations contribute to compensatory processes in normal aging

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 55-66

  Huang, Chih Mao ^a,b   Polk, Thad A ^c   Goh, Joshua O ^d   Park, Denise C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

Age related compensation; Event related fMRI; Interference resolution; Posterior parietal cortex; Prefrontal cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; STROOP TEST; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855746549     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Besner D., Coltheart M. Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia 1979, 17:467-472.
2. Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17:85-100.
3. Cabeza R., Anderson N.D., Locantore J.K., McIntosh A.R. Aging gracefully: Compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage 2002, 17:1394-1402.
4. Cabeza R., Daselaar S.M., Dolcos F., Prince S.E., Budde M., Nyberg L. Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14:364-375.
5. Cappell K.A., Gmeindl L., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Age differences in prefrontal recruitment during verbal working memory maintenance depend on memory load. Cortex 2010, 46:462-473.
6. Colcombe S.J., Kramer A.F., Erickson K.I., Scalf P. The implications of cortical recruitment and brain morphology for individual differences in inhibitory function in aging humans. Psychology and Aging 2005, 20:363-375.
7. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
8. Dale A.M. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 1999, 8:109-114.
9. Davis S.W., Dennis N.A., Daselaar S.M., Fleck M.S., Cabeza R. Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:1201-1209.
10. Davis S.W., Kragel J.E., Madden D.J., Cabeza R. The architecture of cross-hemispheric communication in the aging brain: Linking behavior to functional and structural connectivity. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 10.1093/cercor/bhr123.
11. de Chastelaine M., Wang T.H., Minton B., Muftuler L.T., Rugg M.D. The effects of age, memory performance, and callosal integrity on the neural correlates of successful associative encoding. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 10.1093/cercor/bhq294.
12. Dehaene S., Molko N., Cohen L., Wilson A.J. Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004, 14:218-224.
13. Derrfuss J., Brass M., Neumann J., von Cramon D.Y. Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 25:22-34.
14. DiGirolamo G.J., Kramer A.F., Barad V., Cepeda N.J., Weissman D.H., Milham M.P., et al. General and task-specific frontal lobe recruitment in older adults during executive processes: A fMRI investigation of task-switching. NeuroReport 2001, 12:2065-2071.
15. Everts R., Lidzba K., Wilke M., Kiefer C., Mordasini M., Schroth G., et al. Strengthening of laterality of verbal and visuospatial functions during childhood and adolescence. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30:473-483.
16. Fera F., Weickert T.W., Goldberg T.E., Tessitore A., Hariri A., Das S., et al. Neural mechanisms underlying probabilistic category learning in normal aging. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:11340-11348.
17. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. "Mini-mental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975, 12:189-198.
18. Goh J.O., Suzuki A., Park D.C. Reduced neural selectivity increases fMRI adaptation with age during face discrimination. Neuroimage 2010, 51:336-344.
19. Gutchess A.H., Welsh R.C., Hedden T., Bangert A., Minear M., Liu L.L., et al. Aging and the neural correlates of successful picture encoding: Frontal activations compensate for decreased medial-temporal activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:84-96.
20. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. The psychology of learning and motivation 1988, vol. 22:193-225. Academic Press, New York.
21. Heuninckx S., Wenderoth N., Debaere F., Peeters R., Swinnen S.P. Neural basis of aging: The penetration of cognition into action control. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:6787-6796.
22. Heuninckx S., Wenderoth N., Swinnen S.P. Systems neuroplasticity in the aging brain: Recruiting additional neural resources for successful motor performance in elderly persons. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:91-99.
23. Jimura K., Braver T.S. Age-related shifts in brain activity dynamics during task switching. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:1420-1431.
24. Kaufmann L., Koppelstaetter F., Delazer M., Siedentopf C., Rhomberg P., Golaszewski S., et al. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2005, 25:888-898.
25. Langenecker S.A., Nielson K.A., Rao S.M. fMRI of healthy older adults during Stroop interference. Neuroimage 2004, 21:192-200.
26. Liu X., Wang H., Corbly C.R., Zhang J., Joseph J.E. The involvement of the inferior parietal cortex in the numerical Stroop effect and the distance effect in a two-digit number comparison task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1518-1530.
27. Mathis A., Schunck T., Erb G., Namer I.J., Luthringer R. The effect of aging on the inhibitory function in middle-aged subjects: A functional MRI study coupled with a color-matched Stroop task. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2009, 24:1062-1071.
28. Milham M.P., Erickson K.I., Banich M.T., Kramer A.F., Webb A., Wszalek T., et al. Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain and Cognition 2002, 49:277-296.
29. Nee D., Wager T., Jonides J. Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:1-17.
30. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Garavan H. Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17:56-71.
31. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Ross T.J., Garavan H., Rao S.M., Stein E.A. Comparability of functional MRI response in young and old during inhibition. NeuroReport 2004, 15:129-133.
32. Park D.C., Lautenschlager G., Hedden T., Davidson N.S., Smith A.D., Smith P.K. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17:299-320.
33. Park D.C., Reuter-Lorenz P. The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:173-196.
34. Park D.C., Welsh R.C., Marshuetz C., Gutchess A.H., Mikels J., Polk T.A., et al. Working memory for complex scenes: Age differences in frontal and hippocampal activations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:1122-1134.
35. Prakash R.S., Erickson K.I., Colcombe S.J., Kim J.S., Voss M.W., Kramer A.F. Age-related differences in the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control. Brain and Cognition 2009, 71:328-335.
36. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Cappell K.A. Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:177-182.
37. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Jonides J., Smith E.E., Hartley A., Miller A., Marshuetz C., et al. Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:174-187.
38. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Park D.C. Human neuroscience and the aging mind: A new look at old problems. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2010, 65:405-415.
39. Roberts K.L., Hall D.A. Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: A systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory Stroop tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:1063-1078.
40. Schneider-Garces N.J., Gordon B.A., Brumback-Peltz C.R., Shin E., Lee Y., Sutton B.P., et al. Span, CRUNCH, and beyond: Working memory capacity and the aging brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:655-669.
41. Schulte T., Müller-Oehring E.M., Chanraud S., Rosenbloom M.J., Pfefferbaum A., Sullivan E.V. Age-related reorganization of functional networks for successful conflict resolution: A combined functional and structural MRI study. Neurobiology of Aging 2009, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.002.
42. Shipley W.C. Shipley Institute of living scale 1986, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.
43. Spieler D.H., Balota D.A., Faust M.E. Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:461-479.
44. Spreng R.N., Wojtowicz M., Grady C.L. Reliable differences in brain activity between young and old adults: A quantitative meta-analysis across multiple cognitive domains. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34:1178-1194.
45. Tang J., Critchley H.D., Glaser D.E., Dolan R.J., Butterworth B. Imaging informational conflict: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of numerical Stroop. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:2049-2062.
46. Tzelgov J., Meyer J., Henik A. Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:166-179.
47. Vallesi A., McIntosh A.R., Stuss D.T. Over recruitment in the aging brain as a function of task demands: Evidence for a compensatory view. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:801-815.
48. Verhaeghen P., De Meersman L. Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging 1998, 13:120-126.
49. Wager T.D., Sylvester C.-Y.C., Lacey S.C., Nee D.E., Franklin M., Jonides J. Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 2005, 27:323-340.
50. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale 1997, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
51. Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale 1997, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
52. Wilke M., Schmithorst V.J. A combined bootstrap/histogram analysis approach for computing a lateralization index from neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 2006, 33:522-530.
53. Wood G., Ischebeck A., Koppelstaetter F., Gotwald T., Kaufmann L. Developmental trajectories of magnitude processing and interference control: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:2755-2765.
54. Zhu D.C., Zacks R.T., Slade J.M. Brain activation during interference resolution in young and older adults: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 2010, 50:810-817.
55. Zysset S., Schroeter M.L., Neumann J., Yves von Cramon D. Stroop interference, hemodynamic response and aging: An event-related fMRI study. Neurobiology of Aging 2007, 28:937-946.