Editorial Introduction: Re-Making Migration Theory

Population, Space and Place

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 127-133

  Smith, Darren P ^a   King, Russell ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinary approach; Intersectionality; Migration theory; Population geography; Social theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855720757     PISSN: 15448444     EISSN: 15448452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psp.686     Document Type: Editorial

References (37)

1. Bailey A. 2005. Making Population Geography. Arnold: London.
2. Bürkner HJ. 2012. Intersectionality: how gender studies might inspire the analysis of social inequality among migrants. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 181-195.
3. Castles S. 2007. Twenty-first century migration as a challenge to sociology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33: 351-371.
4. Castles S. 2010. Understanding global migration: a social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36: 1565-1586.
5. Clark A. 2010a. Moving through deprived neighbourhoods. Population, Space and Place 15: 523-533.
6. Clark WAV. 2010b. Prices, Expectations and the Changing Housing Market: A Commentary and Discussion. Available at
7. Cohen R. 1996. Introduction. In Theories of Migration, Cohen R (ed.). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham; xi-xvii.
8. Cooke TJ. 2009. Reappraising Family Migration in an era of Decreasing Mobility and Household Restructuring. Keynote speech at conference on Family, Migration and Housing, Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and international Development Studies, Netherlands, 2-3 April.
9. De Haas H. 2010. Migration and development: a theoretical perspective. International Migration Review 44: 227-264.
10. Dennett A, Stillwell J. 2010. Internal migration in Britain, 2000-01, examined through an area classification framework. Population, Space and Place 16: 517-538.
11. Dorling D. 2009. Youth unemployment. Today, BBC Radio 4, 12th August.
12. Ellis M. 2012. Reinventing US internal migration studies in the age of international migration. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 196-208.
13. Findlay A. 2005. Editorial: vulnerable spatialities. Population, Space and Place 11: 429-439.
14. Findlay A, Graham E. 1991. The challenge facing population geography. Progress in Human Geography 15: 149-162.
15. Fujita K. 2011. The global financial crisis, state regime shifts, and urban theory. Environment and Planning A 43: 265-271.
16. Graham E. 2000. The past, present and future of population geography: reflections on Glenn Trewartha's address fifty years on. Population, Space and Place 10: 289-294.
17. Graham E. 2004. What kind of theory for what kind of population geography? Population, Space and Place 6: 257-272.
18. Graham E, Boyle P. 2001. Editorial introduction. (Re)theorising population geography: mapping the unfamiliar. Population, Space and Place 7: 389-394.
19. Halfacree KH. 2012. Heterolocal identities? Counter-urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 209-224.
20. Hamnett C. 2010. Moving the poor out of central London? The implications of the coalition government 2011 cuts to Housing Benefits. Environment and Planning A 42: 1-11
21. Hamnett C. 2011. The reshaping of the British welfare system and its implications for geography and geographers. Progress in Human Geography, in press.
22. Kabisch N, Haase D. 2011. Diversifying European agglomerations: evidence of urban population trends for the 21st century. Population, Space and Place 17(3) 236-253.
23. Kellerman A. 2010. Mobile broadband services and the availability of instant access to cyberspace. Environment and Planning A 42: 2990-3005.
24. King R. 2002. Towards a new map of European migration. International Journal of Population Geography 8: 89-106.
25. King R. 2012. Geography and migration studies: retrospect and prospect. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 134-153.
26. King R, Skeldon R. 2010. 'Mind the gap!' Integrating approaches to internal and international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36: 1619-1646.
27. Legg S. 2005. Foucault's population geographies: classifications, biopolitics and governmental spaces. Population, Space and Place 11: 137-156.
28. Philo C. 2005. Sex, life, death, geography: fragmentary remarks inspired by 'Foucault's population geographies'. Population, Space and Place 11: 325-333.
29. Silvey R. 2004. On the boundaries of a subfield: social theory's incorporation into population geography. Population, Space and Place 10: 303-308.
30. Simpson L, Finney N. 2009. Spatial patterns of internal migration: evidence for ethnic groups in Britain. Population, Space and Place 15: 37-56.
31. Skeldon R. 2006. Interlinkages between internal and international migration and development in the Asian region. Population, Space and Place 12: 15-30.
32. Skeldon R. 2012. Migration transitions revisited: their continued relevance for the development of migration theory. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 154-166.
33. Smith DP. 2012. Geographies of long-distance family migration: moving to a spatial turn. Progress in Human Geography, in press.
34. Stillwell J. 2010. Ethnic population concentration and net migration in London. Environment and Planning A 42: 1439-1456.
35. White P, Jackson P. 1995. (Re)theorising population geography. International Journal of Population Geography 1: 111-123.
36. Williams A, Baláž V. 2012. Migration, risk and uncertainty: theoretical perspectives. Population, Space and Place 18(2): 167-180.
37. Withers SD, Clark W. 2006. Housing costs and the geography of family migration outcomes. Population, Space and Place 12: 273-289.