The intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Opportunities for the social sciences

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 217-224

  Duraiappah, Anantha Kumar ^a   Rogers, Deborah ^a  

^a International Human Dimensions Programme   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assessments; Capacity building; IPBES; Knowledge generation; Scenarios; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIODIVERSITY; CAPACITY BUILDING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM;

EID: 84855699197     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2011.592052     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berkhout, F., et al., 2010. Sustainability experiments in Asia: innovations shaping alternative development pathways? Environmental science and policy, 13 (4), 261-271.
2. Carpenter, S.R., et al., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 106, 1305-1312.
3. CBD, 2010. Global biodiversity outlook 3. Montreal: Secretariat, Convention on Biological Diversity, 95.
4. Duraiappah, A.K. and Naeem, S., 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
5. ICSU, 2010. ICfS: Grand challenges in global sustainability research: a systems approach to research priorities for the decade. Paris: International Council for Science.
6. Inter Academy Council, 2010. Inter Academy Council review of the IPCC. Amsterdam: Secretariat, Inter Academy Council, p. 123.
7. Kumar, P., 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan, 456.
8. Larigauderie, A. and Mooney, H.A., 2010. The intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 2 (1-2), 9-14.
9. Liu, J., et al., 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317, pp. 1513-1516.
10. Loreau, M., et al., 2006. Diversity without representation. Nature, 442, 245-246.
11. Mace, G. and Mooney, H.A., 2009. Biodiversity policy challenges. Science, 325, 1474.
12. Perrings, C., et al., 2011. Ecology. The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science, 331 (6021), 1139-1140.
13. Raffaelli, D., et al., 2005. The future of healthy ecosystems. London: DEFRA.
14. Reid, W.V., et al., 2010. Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science, 330 (6006), 916-917.
15. Rogers, D.S. and Scherkenbach, C., 2011. Ihdp-launches-global-survey-on-social-sciences. Available from: http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/article/read/ihdp-launches-global-survey-onsocial-sciences.
16. Turner, B.L., et al., 2003. Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 8080-8085.
17. UNEP, 2010a. Report of the third ad hoc intergovernmental and multi-stakeholder meeting on an intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Available from: http://www.ipbes.net/images/stories/documents/K1061514%20IPBES-3-3%20%20-%20%20REPORT.pdf.
18. UNEP, 2010b. Capacity-building in an intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Available from: http://ipbes.net/meetings/Documents/IPBES-2/UNEP_IPBES_2_INF_6_en.pdf.
19. UNEP, 2011. Intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Available from: http://ipbes.net/.
20. UNGA, 2011. Resolutions, 64th session: General Assembly of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/ga/64/resolutions.shtml.