Analysis & commentary: Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce 'alert fatigue' while still minimizing the risk of litigation

Health Affairs

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2310-2317

  Kesselheim, Aaron S ^a   Cresswell, Kathrin ^b   Phansalkar, Shobha ^c   Bates, David W ^a,b,c   Sheikh, Aziz ^c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FATIGUE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICATION ERROR; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; ONLINE SYSTEM; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PURCHASING; RISK; COMPUTER ASSISTED DRUG THERAPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; REMINDER SYSTEM;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DRUG THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MEDICAL ORDER ENTRY SYSTEMS; MEDICATION ERRORS; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84855698737     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1111     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1311-6.
2. Black A, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000387.
3. Eslami S, Abu-Hanna A, de Keizer NF. Evaluation of outpatient computerized physician medication order entry systems: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(4):400-6.
4. Kuperman GJ, Bobb A, Payne TH, Avery AJ, Gandhi TK, Burns G, et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1): 29-40.
5. Van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(2):138-47.
6. Avery AJ, Savelyich BS, Sheikh A, Cantrill J, Morris CJ, Fernando B, et al. Identifying and establishing consensus on the most important safety features of GP computer systems: e-Delphi study. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(1):3-12.
7. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Kuperman GJ, Blumenfeld B, et al. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(1): 5-11.
8. Miller RA, Waitman LR, Chen S, Rosenbloom ST. The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt. J Biomed Inform. 2005; 38(6):469-85.
9. Fieschi M, Dufour JC, Staccini P, Gouvernet J, Bouhaddou O. Medical decision support systems: old dilemmas and new paradigms? Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(3):190-8.
10. Heathfield HA, Wyatt J. Philosophies for the design and development of clinical decision-support systems. Methods Inf Med. 1993;32(1):1-8.
11. Koppel R, Kreda D. Health care information technology vendors' "hold harmless" clause: implications for patients and clinicians. JAMA. 2009;301(12):1276-8.
12. Gable JK. An overview of the legal liabilities facing manufacturers of medical information systems. Quinnipiac Health Law J. 2001;5:127-51.
13. Fox J, Thomson R. Clinical decision support systems: a discussion of quality, safety, and legal liability issues. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:265-9.
14. Mangalmurti SS, Murtagh L, Mello MM. Medical malpractice liability in the age of electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(21):2060-7.
15. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Clinical Decision Support Workshop meeting summary, August 25-26, 2009 [Internet]. Washington (DC): ONC; 2009 [cited 2011 Nov 15]. Available from: http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/document/898131/onc_cds_workshop_meeting_summary_pdf
16. Teich JM, Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, Sittig DF, Jenders RA. Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):365-76.
17. Burton LC, Anderson GF, Kues IW. Using electronic health records to help coordinate care. Milbank Q. 2004;82(3):457-81.
18. Greenberg M, Ridgely MS. Clinical decision support and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2011;306(1):90-1.
19. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, DesRoches CM, Peugh J, Zapert K, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2609-17.
20. Hermer LD, Brody H. Defensive medicine, cost containment, and reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(5):470-3.
21. Budetti PP. Tort reform and the patient safety movement: seeking common ground. JAMA. 2005; 293(21):2660-2.
22. Miller RA, Gardner RM. Summary recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):842-5.
23. Food and Drug Administration. General principles of software validation; final guidance for industry and FDA staff [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2002 Jan 11 [cited 2011 Apr 30]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm085281.htm
24. Shuren J. Testimony of Jeffrey Shuren, director of FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, to Health Information Technology (HIT) Policy Committee [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration; 2010 Feb 25 [cited 2011 Apr 30]. Available from: http://law2point0.com/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2010/03/DrShrudenPreparedTestiony.pdf
25. Epstein RA. Case and materials on torts. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Little, Brown and Company; 1995.
26. American Law Institute. Restatement of the law, second, torts, sec. 402A, comment j. Philadelphia (PA): The Institute; 1965.
27. Rick SL. The key issue in reducing risk of liability with expert systems: product or service. In: IEEE International Conference on Developing and Managing Intelligent System Projects, 1993. Washington (DC): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 1993. p. 124-9.
28. Bequai A. Legal status of expert systems. Comput Law Secur Rep. 2005;8(3):136.
29. Studdert DM, Mello MM. When tort resolutions are "wrong": predictors of discordant outcomes in medical malpractice litigation. J Legal Stud. 2007;36:S47-78.
30. Mancino PB, Siachos PG. Physician liability for malfunctioning equipment. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5(4): 546-9.
31. Miller RA, Miller SM. Legal and regulatory issues related to the use of clinical software in health care delivery. In: Greenes RA, editor. Clinical decision support: the road ahead. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2007. p. 423-44
32. Ware A, Castle G. Product liability for medical devices. Regulatory Affairs Journal Devices. 2005;14(Jul/Aug): 217-24.
33. Miller RA, Schaffner KF, Meisel A. Ethical and legal issues related to use of computer programs in clinical medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102(4):529-37.
34. Hall TS. Reimagining the learned intermediary rule for the new pharmaceutical marketplace. Seton Hall Law Rev. 2004;35(1):193-261.
35. Hoffman S, Podgurski A. Finding a cure: the case for regulation and oversight of electronic health record systems. Harvard J Law Tech. 2008; 22:103-65.
36. Berner ES. Ethical and legal issues in the use of clinical decision support systems. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2002;16(4):34-7.
37. Yu DT, Peterson JF, Seger DL, Werth GC, Bates DW. Frequency of potential azole drug-drug interactions and consequences of potential fluconazole drug interactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005; 14(11):755-67.
38. Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, Armstrong S, Elliott R, Howard R, et al. Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices. Trials. 2009;10:28.
39. Samanta A, Mello MM, Foster C, Tingle J, Samanta J. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negli-gence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard? Med Law Rev. 2006;14(3):321-66.
40. Hurwitz B. Clinical guidelines and the law: negligence, discretion and judgment. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.
41. Recupero PR. Clinical practice guidelines as learned treatises: understanding their use as evidence in the courtroom. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(3):290-301.
42. Miller RA. Legal issues related to medical decision support systems. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1989; 6(2):75-80.
43. Mollon B, Chong J Jr., Holbrook AM, Sung M, Thabane L, Foster G. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:11.
44. Teich JM, Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, Sittig DF, Jenders RA. Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):365-76.
45. Miller RA, Gardner RM, Johnson KB, Hripcsak G. Clinical decision support and electronic prescribing systems: a time for responsible thought and action. J Amer Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12(4):403-9.
46. Sittig DF, Classen DC. Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework. JAMA. 2010; 303(5):450-1.
47. Geissbuhler A, Geissbuhler A. Computer-assisted clinical decision support. Chap. 14 in: Chapman GB, Sonnenberg FA, editors. Decision making in healthcare: theory, psychology, and applications. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 362-85.
48. Metzger J, Welebob E, Bates DW, Lipsitz S, Classen DC. Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(4): 655-63.
49. Coiera EW, Westbrook JI. Should clinical software be regulated? Med J Aust. 2006;184(12):600-1.
50. Australian Department of Health and Ageing. Australian Health Information Council electronic decision support systems report-2008 [Internet]. Canberra: The Department; 2008 [cited 2011 Nov 15]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/9B50F6B541401BBACA25753F007C283A/$File/AHIC%20EDSS%20web%20version%2012%20January%202009.pdf
51. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Phansalkar S, Sheikh A. Opportunities and challenges in creating an international centralised knowledge base for clinical decision support systems in ePrescribing. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(7):625-30.
52. Manos D. Certification Commission accelerates certification development [Internet]. New Gloucester (ME): Healthcare IT News, MedTech Media. 23 Mar 23 [cited 2011 Apr 30]. Available from: http://healthcareitnews.com/news/certification-commissionaccelerates-certificationdevelopment
53. NHS Connecting for Health. Health informatics-application of patient safety risk management to the manufacture of health software [Internet]. London: National Health Service; 2009 Apr [cited 2011 Apr 30]. Available from: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/clinsafety/dscn/dscn14.pdf
54. World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO draft guidelines for adverse event reporting and learning systems: from information to action [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005 [cited 2011 Apr 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/events/05/Reporting_Guidelines.pdf
55. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medical errors. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1197-203.
56. Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(5): 547-56.
57. Strom BL, Schinnar R, Aberra F, Bilker W, Hennessy S, Leonard CE, et al. Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2010;170(17):1578-83.
58. Van der Sijs H, Aarts J, van Gelder T, Berg M, Vulto A. Turning off frequently overridden drug alerts: limited opportunities for doing it safely. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4): 439-48.