IS/IT project investment decision making

Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology:

Volumn 2, Issue , 2000, Pages 502-507

  Fasheng, Qiu ^a   Teck, Yeo Khim ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Information systems; Information technology; Project management; Risk management; SSM

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

BALANCE SCORECARD; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; EVALUATION; INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING; POWERFUL SYSTEMS; PROJECT EVALUATION; QUANTITATIVE TOOL; SSM;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84855697487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMIT.2000.916741     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Simon, H. A., 'Decision Making and Problem Solving', http://dieoff.org/pagel63.htm.
2. Checkland, P. & Holwell, S., 'Information, Systems and Information Systems-making sense of the field', John Wiley&Sons, 1998.
3. Remenyi, D., 'Achieving Maximum Value from Information Systems: A Process Approach', John Wiley & Sons, p 46, 1997.
4. Bacon, C. J., 'The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments', MIS Quarterly 3, 335-353, 1992.
5. Farbey, B., 'Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues', Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8, 189-207, 1999.
6. Hawgood, J., and Land, F., 'A multivalent approach to information systems assessment', in Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Challenges', Fjorn-Anderson (ed), pp. 103-124, 1988.
7. Ginzberg, M.J., and Zmud, R.W., 'Evolving criteria for information systems assessment', in Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Challenges, Fjorn-Anderson (ed), pp.41-52, 1988.
8. Delone, WH and McLena, ER, 'Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable', Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95, 1992.
9. Remenyi, D., Money, A., and Twite, A., A guide to measuring and managing IT benefits, ISBN I-85554-138-6, 1994.
10. Tavana, T. & Banerjee, S., 'Strategic Assessment Model (SAM): A Multiple Criteria Decision Support System for Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives', Decision Sciences, 26(1) 119-142, 1995.
11. Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & parks, D., 'Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study', Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 123-139, 1988, .
12. Grant, J.H., & King, W.R., The logic of strategic planning. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1982.
13. Rhyne, L.C., 'The relationship of information usage characteristics to planning systems sophistication: An empirical examination', Strategic Management Journal, 1985, 6, 319-337.
14. Pettigrew, A. & Whipp, R., 'Managing Change for Competitive Success', Blackwell Business, Oxford, 1991.
15. Checkland, P., Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley and Sons, UK, 1981.
16. Checkland, P., and Schoies, J., Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley & Sons 1990.
17. Ward, J. and Elvin, R., 'A new framework for managing IT-enabled business change', Information Systems Journal 9, 197-221, 1999.
18. Yeo, K. T., 'Management of computing: from content analysis to trend study', International Journal of Project Management, Vol.10 No 4 November 1992.
19. Kaplan R. and Norton D., The balanced scorecard -measures that drive performance', Harvard Business Review, pp.71-79, January-February, 1992.
20. Kaplan R. and Norton D., 'Putting the balanced scorecard to work', Harvard Business Review, pp. 134-142, September-October 1993.
21. Kaplan R. and Norton D., 'Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system', Harvard Business Review, pp.75-78, January-February 1996.
22. Saaty, T. A., 'Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures', Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281, 1977.
23. Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.