Stakeholders' perception as support for forest landscape planning

International Journal of Ecology

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  De Meo, Isabella ^a   Cantiani, Maria Giulia ^b   Ferretti, Fabrizio ^a   Paletto, Alessandro ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855671157     PISSN: 16879708     EISSN: 16879716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2011/685708     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hickey G. M., Regulatory approaches to monitoring sustainable forest management International Forestry Review 2004 6 2 89 98 (Pubitemid 44249651)
2. Hickey G. M., Innes J. L., Kozak R. A., Monitoring and information reporting for sustainable forest management: a regional comparison of forestry stakeholder perceptions Journal of Environmental Management 2007 84 4 572 585 (Pubitemid 47053798)
3. European Commission, Natura 2000 e foreste: sfide ed opportunit. Guida interpretativa. Ufficio delle pubblicazioni ufficiali della Comunit Europea, Lussemburgo, pp. 107, 2003
4. FAO-ECE-ILO, Public participation in forestry in Europe and North America. Report of the FAO/ECE/ILO Joint Committee Team of Specialists on Participation in Forestry Working Paper 2000 163 Geneva, Switzerland Sectorial Activities Department, International Labour Office
5. Kazemi Y., Instruments de la participation publique: quelques repres théoriques sur la notion de participation publique dans le cadre de larticle 18, alinéa 3 de lOrdonnance fédérale sur les forts. Document préparatoire au cours SSF/CRIFOR/CSAF. Instruments de la Participation Publique. Olten, Switzerland, 2001
6. Cantiani M. G., Bettelini D., Mariotta S., Participatory forest planning: a chance of communication between forest service and local communities Proceedings of the International Conference FAO/ECE/ILO Forestry meets the Public October 2001 Rttihubelbad, Switzerland 249 263
7. Cheng A. S., Kruger L. E., Daniels S. E., Place as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda Society and Natural Resources 2003 16 2 87 104 (Pubitemid 36199397)
8. O'Brien E., A question of value: what do trees and forests mean to people in Vermont? Landscape Research 2006 31 3 257 275 (Pubitemid 44173313)
9. Schmitehusen V. F., Wild-Eck S., Uses and perceptions of forests by people living in urban areas findings from selected empirical studies Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 2000 119 6 395 408 (Pubitemid 32109109)
10. Tarrant M. A., Cordell H. K., Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship Environmental Management 2002 30 5 692 703 (Pubitemid 36927541)
11. Trakolis D., Local people's perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece Journal of Environmental Management 2001 61 3 227 241 (Pubitemid 32600700)
12. Rackham O., Ancient Woodland: Its History, Vegetation and Uses in England 1980 London, UK Edward Arnold
13. Rackham O., The History of the Countryside 1986 London, UK Joseph Malaby Dent
14. Rotherham I. D., The implications of perceptions and cultural knowledge loss for the management of wooded landscapes: a UK case-study Forest Ecology and Management 2007 249 1-2 100 115 (Pubitemid 47284752)
15. Vera F., Grazing Ecology and Forest History 2000 Oxon, UK CABI Publishing
16. Harrison S. R., Qureshi M. E., Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models Natural Resources Forum 2000 24 1 11 19 (Pubitemid 30157370)
17. Hislop M., Involving People in Forestry: A Toolbox for Public Involvement in Forest and Woodland Planning 2004 Forestry Commission
18. Hair R., Bush P., Ortinau D. J., Marketing Research: A Practical Approach for the New Millennium 2000 Boston, Mass, USA McGraw-Hill
19. Abdi H., Valentin D., Salkind N. J., Multiple correspondence analysis Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics 2007 Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA Sage 651 657
20. Le Roux B., Rouanet H., Geometric Data Analysis, From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis 2004 Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publishers
21. Greenacre M., Blasius J., Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods 2006 London, UK Chapman Hall/CRC