Outcome measures used in pediatric stroke studies: A systematic review

Archives of Neurology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-27

  Engelmann, Kyle A ^a   Jordan, Lori C ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APTITUDE TEST; BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL STUDY; HUMAN; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRIC STROKE OUTCOME MEASURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEDIATRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE;

EID: 84855606256     PISSN: 00039942     EISSN: 15383687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.1015     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Agrawal N, Johnston SC, Wu YW, Sidney S, Fullerton HJ. Imaging data reveal a higher pediatric stroke incidence than prior US estimates. Stroke. 2009;40 (11):3415-3421.
2. Lynch JK, Hirtz DG, DeVeber G, Nelson KB. Report of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop on perinatal and childhood stroke. Pediatrics. 2002;109(1):116-123. (Pubitemid 34049435)
3. Ganesan V. Stroke and neurovascular disorders, investigation and management. http://www.gosh.nhs.uk/clinical-information/clinical-guidelines/cmg- guideline -00058. Updated 2009. Accessed February 21, 2011.
4. Monagle P, Chalmers E, Chan A, et al American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008; 133(6)(suppl):887S-968S. (Pubitemid 351892979)
5. Roach ES, Golomb MR, Adams R, et al American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Management of stroke in infants and children: a scientific statement from a Special Writing Group of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2644-2691.
6. PROMIS Network. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Web site. http://www.nihpromis.org/default.aspx. Updated 2011. Accessed February 21, 2011.
7. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function Web site. http://www.nihtoolbox.org/default.aspx. Updated 2010. Accessed February 21, 2011.
8. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements Web site. http://www .commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov/projreview.aspx. Updated 2010. Accessed February 21, 2011.
9. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition (BSID-II). http: //www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/ehs/perf-measures/reports/resources -measuring/res-meas-cdif.html. Accessed March 11, 2011.
10. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III). http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/ Productdetail.htm? Pid=015-8027-23X. Updated 2005. Accessed March 11, 2011.
11. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version (CVLT-C). http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB /Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=015-8033-957. Updated 1994. Accessed March 11, 2011.
12. Jacobs ML, Donders J. Criterion validity of the California Verbal Learning Test- Second Edition (CVLT-II) after traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(2):143-149. (Pubitemid 46371362)
13. HealthActCHQ Inc. CHQ: Child Health Questionnaire. http://www.healthact. com /survey-chq.php. Updated 2011. Accessed March 11, 2011.
14. Waters E, Salmon L, Wake M, Hesketh K, Wright M. The Child Health Questionnaire in Australia: reliability, validity and population means. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(2):207-210. (Pubitemid 30218933)
15. Denver Developmental Materials Inc. Benefits of the DENVER II. http://www .denverii.com/benefits.html. Updated 2010. Accessed March 11, 2011.
16. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr. 1967;71(2):181-191.
17. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics. 1992;89(1):91-97.
18. Schonwald A. Developmental screening tool kit for primary care providers: screening tools, Denver II. http://www.developmentalscreening.org/screening- tools /denverii.htm. Updated 2007. Accessed March 11, 2011.
19. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1(7905):480-484.
20. Anderson SI, Housley AM, Jones PA, Slattery J, Miller JD. Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj. 1993;7(4):309-317. (Pubitemid 23218378)
21. Smith JA, Bidder RT, Gardner SM, Gray OP. Griffiths Scales of Mental Development and different users. Child Care Health Dev. 1980;6(1):11-16. (Pubitemid 10136928)
22. Luiz DM, Foxcroft CD, Stewart R. The construct validity of the Griffiths Scales of Mental Development. Child Care Health Dev. 2001;27(1):73-83. (Pubitemid 33720723)
23. Rankin J; Internet Stroke Center. Modified Rankin Scale. http://www.strokecenter .org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/modified-rankin.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2011.
24. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091-1096. (Pubitemid 46568483)
25. deVeber GA, MacGregor D, Curtis R, Mayank S. Neurologic outcome in survivors of childhood arterial ischemic stroke and sinovenous thrombosis. J Child Neurol. 2000;15(5):316-324. (Pubitemid 30341363)
26. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf36. shtml. Accessed March 11, 2011.
27. Roid G. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, fifth edition (SB5). http://www.assess .nelson.com/test-ind/stan-b5.html. Updated 2003. Accessed March 11, 2011.
28. Roid G. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, fifth Edition (SB5). http://www.cps .nova.edu/~cpphelp/SB5.html. Accessed March 11, 2011.
29. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. http: //www.friendsnrc.org/joomdocs/vabs.pdf. Updated 1984. Accessed March 11, 2011.
30. Hurvitz E, Warschausky S, Berg M, Tsai S. Long-term functional outcome of pediatric stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(2):51-59. (Pubitemid 38685838)
31. Robison F. The Wechsler Intelligence Scales. http://www.iupui.edu/~flip/ wechsler .html. Accessed March 11, 2011.
32. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/ Productdetail.htm? Pid=015-8979-044. Updated 2003. Accessed March 11, 2011.
33. Merkies IS, Hughes RA. The measurement of disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(9):943.
34. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Thompson AJ. Effect sizes can be misleading: is it time to change the way we measure change? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81(9):1044-1048.
35. Saver JL, Filip B, Hamilton S, et al FAST-MAG Investigators and Coordinators. Improving the reliability of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice: the Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA). Stroke. 2010;41(5):992-995.
36. Thissen D, Varni JW, Stucky BD, Liu Y, Irwin DE, Dewalt DA. Using the PedsQLTM 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(9):1497-1505.
37. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39(8):800-812. (Pubitemid 33686263)
38. Upton P, Eiser C, Cheung I, et al. Measurement properties of the UK-English version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:22.