Assessing task-technology fit in a PACS upgrade: Do users' and developers' appraisals converge?

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 951-958

  Lepanto, Luigi ^b   Sicotte, Claude ^a   Lehoux, Pascale ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation research; Models; Organizational innovation; Picture archiving and communication system (PACS); Questionnaires; Radiology information systems; Task technology fit; Technology assessment; Theoretical

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS); QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; THEORETICAL;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; MODELS; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; RADIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84855586407     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9378-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. (2010) IMV: Peripherals, upgrades dominate mature PACS market. HealthImaging.com, 2010
2. Mattern CW, et al: Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging 12(2 Suppl 1):155-9, 1999
3. Reiner BI, et al: Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(4):861-4, 2001 (Pubitemid 32240923)
4. Andriole KP: Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations. J Digit Imaging 15(3):161-9, 2002 (Pubitemid 40834846)
5. Lepanto L, et al: Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity. J Digit Imaging 19(1):92-7, 2006 (Pubitemid 43384300)
6. Bauman RA, Gell G: The reality of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS): a survey. J Digit Imaging 13(4):157-69, 2000 (Pubitemid 32090461)
7. Crivianu-Gaita D, et al: User acceptability-a critical success factor for picture archiving and communication system implementation. J Digit Imaging 13(2 Suppl 1):13-6, 2000
8. Pilling JR: Picture archiving and communication systems: the users' view. Br J Radiol 76(908):519-24, 2003 (Pubitemid 37028404)
9. Pare G, et al: Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21(4):471-9, 2005 (Pubitemid 41642839)
10. Duyck P, et al: User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system. Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in a radiological setting. Methods Inf Med 47(2):149-56, 2008 (Pubitemid 351438405)
11. Holden RJ, Karsh BT: The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 43(1):159- 72, 2010
12. Goodhue DL: Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science 41(12):1827-1844, 1995
13. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL: Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 1995, pp 213-236
14. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C: IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:3, 2006
15. Ammenwerth E, et al: Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10(1):69-84, 2003 (Pubitemid 36134063)
16. Tsiknakis M, Kouroubali A: Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework. Int J Med Inform 78(1):39-52, 2009
17. Fuller RM, Dennis AR: Does fit matter? The impact of task- technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Information Systems Research 20(1):2-17, 2009