Capability of 2 gait measures for detecting response to gait training in stroke survivors: Gait assessment and intervention tool and the tinetti gait scale

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 129-136

  Zimbelman, Janice ^a,b   Daly, Janis J ^a,b   Roenigk, Kristen L ^b   Butler, Kristi ^b   Burdsall, Richard ^b   Holcomb, John P ^c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordination impairment; Gait; Outcomes assessment; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; GAIT ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION TOOL; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; SURVIVOR; TINETTI GAIT SCALE; TRAINING; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WALKING SPEED;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE; SURVIVORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84855551807     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Coutts F. Gait analysis in the therapeutic environment. Man Ther 1999;4:2-10. (Pubitemid 29179390)
2. Davis RB. Reflections on clinical gait analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1997;7:251-7.
3. Toro B, Nester C, Farren P. A review of observational gait assessment in clinical practice. Physiother Theory Pract 2003;19:137-49. (Pubitemid 37243334)
4. Chapin KB. A focus on clinical gait analysis. Rehab Manag 2010;23:10-2.
5. Harrison EL, Duenkel N, Dunlop R, Russell G. Evaluation of single-leg standing following anterior cruciate ligament surgery and rehabilitation. Phys Ther 1994;74:245-52. (Pubitemid 24067062)
6. Haupstein T, Goldie P. Visual judgements of steadiness in one-legged stance: reliability and validity. Physiother Res Int 2000;5:141-56.
7. Miyazaki S, Kubota T. Quantification of gait abnormalities on the basis of continuous foot-force measurement: correlation between quantitative indices and visual rating. Med Biol Eng Comput 1984;22:70-6. (Pubitemid 14216306)
8. McGinley JL, Morris ME, Greenwood KM, Goldie PA, Olney SJ. Accuracy of clinical observations of push-off during gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:779-85. (Pubitemid 43767708)
9. Vanswearingen JM, Paschal KA, Bonino P, Yang JF. The modified Gait Abnormality Rating Scale for recognizing the risk of recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly adults. Phys Ther 1996;76:994-1002. (Pubitemid 26299077)
10. Daly JJ, Nethery J, McCabe JP, et al. Development and testing of the Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.): a measure of coordinated gait components. J Neurosci Methods 2009;178:334-9.
11. Patla AE, Clouse SD. Visual assessment of human gait: reliability and validity. Rehabil Res 1988;(October):87-96.
12. Rodriquez AA, Black PO, Kile KA, et al. Gait training efficacy using a home-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:801-5. (Pubitemid 26262380)
13. Turani N, Kemiksizoglu A, Karatas M, Ozker R. Assessment of hemiplegic gait using the Wisconsin Gait Scale. Scand J Caring Sci 2004;18:103-8. (Pubitemid 41710717)
14. Lord SE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Visual gait analysis: the development of a clinical assessment and scale. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:107-19. (Pubitemid 28223209)
15. Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Thorofare: Slack; 1992.
16. Clarke JE, Eccleston C. Assessing the quality of walking in adults with chronic pain: the development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Bath Assessment of Walking Inventory. Eur J Pain 2009;13:305-11.
17. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986;34:119-26. (Pubitemid 16159911)
18. Zipp GP, Sullivan JE, Rose DK, et al. Neurology section outcome measures recommendations: stroke. Available at: http://www.neuropt.org/go/healthcare- professionals/neurology-section-outcome-measures-recommendations/stroke. Accessed February 16, 2011.
19. Krasovsky T, Levin MF. Review: toward a better understanding of coordination in healthy and poststroke gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:213-24.
20. Kopke S, Meyer G. The Tinetti test: Babylon in geriatric assessment. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2006;39:288-91. (Pubitemid 44356733)
21. Daly JJ, Zimbelman J, Roenigk KL, et al. Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus no FES, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25:588-96.
22. Ryerson S, Levit K. Functional movement reeducation: a contemporary model for stroke rehabilitation. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
23. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. J Neurol Sci 2004;225:105-15. (Pubitemid 39328087)
24. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Electrically induced recovery of gait components for older patients with chronic stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:349-60. (Pubitemid 30441335)
25. Daly JJ, Barnicle K, Kobetic R, Marsolais EB. Electrically induced gait changes post stroke, using an FNS system with intramuscular electrodes and multiple channels. J Neuro Rehab 1993;7:17-25.
26. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall; 2000.
27. Faber MJ, Bosscher RJ, van Wieringen PC. Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment. Phys Ther 2006;86:944-54.
28. Behrman AL, Light KE, Miller GM. Sensitivity of the Tinetti Gait Assessment for detecting change in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:399-405. (Pubitemid 34746045)
29. Tilson JK, Sullivan KJ, Cen SY, et al. Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther 2010;90:196-208.
30. Duncan PW, for the LEAPS Investigative Team. Body-weight - supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2026-36.
31. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995;26:982-9.
32. Tilson JK, Sullivan KJ, Cen SY, et al. Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther 2010;90:196-208.
33. Ralston HJ. Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking. Int Z Angew Physiol 1958;17:277-83.
34. Corcoran PJ, Brengelmann GL. Oxygen uptake in normal and handicapped subjects, in relation to speed of walking beside velocity-controlled cart. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970;51:78-87.
35. Zarrugh MY, Todd FN, Ralston HJ. Optimization of energy expenditure during level walking. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1974;33:293-306.
36. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed. Gait Posture 2004;20:140-6. (Pubitemid 39141826)
37. Waters RL, Campbell J, Thomas L, Hugos L, Davis P. Energy costs of walking in lower-extremity plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:896-9. (Pubitemid 12099975)