Information that should be given to HIV cohort participants during ongoing research: The viewpoints of patient representatives and research professionals

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 76-83

  Franrenet, Sandra ^a   Moutel, Grégoire ^a   Raffi, François ^b   Bruyand, Mathias ^c   Hervé, Christian ^a   Leport, Catherine ^a   Duchange, Nathalie ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Cohort; HIV; Information after inclusion; Research participants; Therapeutic misconception

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; COHORT ANALYSIS; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COHORT STUDIES; DISCLOSURE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84855548988     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.76     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., & Lidz, C. (1982). The therapeu-tic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5(3-4), 319-329.
2. Baret, L. & Godard, B. (2011). Opinions and intentions of par-ents of an autistic child toward genetic research results: Two typical profiles. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19(11), 1127-1132.
3. Collard, V. & Taéron, C. (2004). Ethical aspects of clinical tri-als and patient informed-consent sheet: HIV/AIDS. Thérapie, 59(4), 407-411. (Pubitemid 39486869)
4. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Retrieved from http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout-guide2002.pdf
5. Dixon-Woods, M., Jackson, C., Windridge, K. C., & Kenyon, S. (2006). Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: Qualitative study of participants' views. British Medical Journal, 332(7535), 206-210.
6. Fernandez, C. V., Kodish, E., & Weijer, C. (2003). Informing study participants of research results: An ethical imperative. IRB, 25(3), 12-19.
7. Knoppers, B. M., Joly, Y., Simard, J., & Durocher, F. (2006). The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14(11), 1170-1179.
8. Lazovski, J., Losso, M., Krohmal, B., Emanuel, E. J., Grady, C., & Wendler, D. (2009). Benefits and burdens of participa-tion in a longitudinal clinical trial. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(3), 89-97.
9. Le Moing, V., Thiébaut, R., Chêne, G., Leport, C., Cailleton, V., Michelet, C., Fleury, H., Herson, S., Raffi, F., & APROCO Study Group (2002). Predictors of long-term increase in CD4(+) cell counts in human immuno-deficiency virus-infected patients receiving a protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 185(4), 471-480. (Pubitemid 34142809)
10. MacNeil, S. D. & Fernandez, C. V (2006). Offering results to re-search participants. British Medical Journal, 332(7535), 188-189.
11. McCarty, C. A., Garber, A., Reeser, J. C., & Fost, N. C. (2011). Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feed-back for a large biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 155A(4), 737-741.
12. Miller, F. A., Hayeems, R. Z., Li, L., & Bytautas, J. P. (2011). What does "respect for persons" require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research. Journal of Medical Ethics. Published Online First on June 16, 2011: http://jme. bmj.com/content/early/2011/06/16/jme.2010.041350.
13. Moutel, G., Duchange, N., Raffi, F., Sharara, L. I., Théodorou, I., Noël, V. et al. (2005). Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: Standpoints of professionals and patients. European Journal of Human Genetics, 13(9), 1055-1062. (Pubitemid 43073613)
14. Msellati, P., Dupon, M., Morlat, P., Lacoste, D., Pellegrin, J. L., & Dabis, F. (1990). A cohort study of 89 HIV-1-infected adult patients contaminated by blood products: Bordeaux 1981-1989. Groupe d'Epidé miologie Clinique du SIDA en Aquitaine (GECSA). AIDS, 4(11), 1105-1109.
15. Murphy, J., Scott, J., Kaufman, D., Geller, G., LeRoy, L., & Hudson, K. (2008). Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(11), 36-43.
16. Shalowitz, D. I. & Miller, F. G. (2008). Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: Attitudes, prac-tices, and future directions. PLoS Medicine, 5(5), e91.
17. Smith, W., Grady, C., Krohmal, B., Lazovski, J., & Wendler, D. for Insigh t Esprit Group. (2011). Empirical evaluation of the need for "on-going consent" in clinical research. AIDS, 25(1): 107-114.
18. World Medical Association (WMA). (2008). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, South Korea. Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ index.html.