Reply to E.M. Gilles

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 117-

  Oxnard, Geoffrey R ^a   Schwartz, Lawrence H ^b   Riely, Gregory J ^c  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Department of Neurology and the Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain   (United States)

^c MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ACCURACY; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 84855547927     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.3959     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Gilles EM: Radiologic reviews: More second guessing from armchairs cannot lead the way. J Clin Oncol 30:116, 2012
2. Oxnard GR, Zhao B, Sima CS, et al: Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 minutes. J Clin Oncol 29:3114-3119, 2011
3. Zhao B, Oxnard GR, Moskowitz CS, et al: A pilot study of volume measurement as a method of tumor response evaluation to aid biomarker development. Clin Cancer Res 16:4647-4653, 2010
4. Zhao B, James LP, Moskowitz CS, et al: Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Radiology 252:263-272, 2009
5. Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Moskowitz CS, et al: Pulmonary metastases: Effect of CT section thickness on measurement - initial experience. Radiology 234:934-939, 2005 (Pubitemid 40250840)