Comparison of the accuracy of subtraction CT angiography performed on 320-detector row volume CT with conventional CT angiography for diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 118-122

  Luo, Zhuren ^a   Wang, Dan ^a   Sun, Xilin ^a   Zhang, Tong ^a   Liu, Fang ^a   Dong, Dandan ^a   Chan, Nicholas K ^b   Shen, Baozhong ^a  

^a HARBIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

320 Dector row; Computed tomography angiography; Digital subtraction angiography; Intracranial aneurysms; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Volume CT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEUROSURGEON; NEUROSURGERY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SURGICAL CLIPPING;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84855544065     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review. Radiology 2000;217:361-70.
2. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317-20. (Pubitemid 29071796)
3. Teksam M, McKinney A, Casey S, et al. Multi-section CT angiography for detection of cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1485-92. (Pubitemid 44383598)
4. Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC. Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2003;52:624-31. (Pubitemid 36259012)
5. Pozzi-Mucelli F, Bruni S, Doddi M, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms with 64 channel multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol 2007;64:15-26. (Pubitemid 47418569)
6. Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Katada K, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: detection with three-dimensional CT angiography with volume rendering - comparison with conventional angiographic and surgical findings. Radiology 1999;211:497-506. (Pubitemid 29206822)
7. Young N, Dorsch NW, Kingston RJ, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in 200 patients with spiral CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2001;11: 123-30. (Pubitemid 32755425)
8. Anderson GB, Steinke DE, Petruk KC, et al. Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis and early treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1999;45: 1315-20.
9. Velthuis BK, Van Leeuwen MS, Witkamp TD, et al. Computerized tomography angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: from aneurysm detection to treatment without conventional angiography. J Neurosurg 1999;91:761-7. (Pubitemid 30053147)
10. Wintermark M, Uske A, Chalaron M, et al. Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neurosurg 2003;98:828-36. (Pubitemid 36396786)
11. Chen W, Yang Y, Xing W, et al. Sixteen-row multislice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography and intraoperative findings. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1184-91. (Pubitemid 351798495)
12. Agid R, Lee SK, Willinsky RA, et al. Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: using 64-slice multidetector CT angiography to "triage" patients' treatment. Neuroradiology 2006;48:787-94. (Pubitemid 44768849)
13. McKinney AM, Palmer CS, Truwit CL, et al. Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:594-602. (Pubitemid 351424081)
14. Görzer H, Heimberger K, Schindler E. Spiral CT angiography with digital subtraction of extra- and intracranial vessels. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:839-41. (Pubitemid 24286385)
15. Jayakrishnan VK, White PM, Aitken D, et al. Subtraction helical CT angiography of intra- and extracranial vessels: technical considerations and preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:451-5. (Pubitemid 36358999)
16. Venema HW, Hulsmans FJ, den Heeten GJ. CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. Radiology 2001;218:893-8. (Pubitemid 32172579)
17. Romijn M, Gratama van Andel HA, van Walderveen MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:134-9.
18. Lell MM, Ruehm SG, Kramer M, et al. Cranial computed tomography angiography with automated bone subtraction: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2009;44:38-43.
19. Morhard D, Fink C, Becker C, et al. Value of automatic bone subtraction in cranial CT angiography: comparison of bone-subtracted vs. standard CT angiography in 100 patients. Eur Radiol 2008;18:974-82.
20. Sakamoto S, Kiura Y, Shibukawa M, et al. Subtracted 3D CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1332-7. (Pubitemid 44897653)
21. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, et al., Dual-energy CT. angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:23-30.